Skip to main content
C
cbraithwaite1-Visitor
1-Visitor
January 8, 2015
Question

How to remove assumed 'wall' when mirroring extrusion?

  • January 8, 2015
  • 3 replies
  • 1603 views

Im creating a part which is symmetrical so I have mirrored all the extrusions however where it has done so Creo has created a wall/mass along the datum. How can I remove this mass or alter the mirror so this does not happen?

Im new to Creo

Thanks for any help.


This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.

3 replies

T
TomD.inPDX17-Peridot
17-Peridot
January 8, 2015

A picture might be in order here. This doesn't sound like typical behavior.

Welcome to the forum, Cameron.

D
dgschaefer21-Topaz II
21-Topaz II
January 8, 2015

I agree, an image or two would help.

However, a more reliable way to create a symmetric part is to build one entire half of the part and then mirror the part itself by selecting the part at the top of the tree and then selecting mirror. Mirroring (or copying) individual features "locks" the parent feature, limiting how it can be redefined. New references cannot be chosen without deleting the mirrored copy first.

That may not help this specific situation, however it will result in a more robust and flexible part.

    C
    cbraithwaite1-VisitorAuthor
    1-Visitor
    January 8, 2015

    Hi Doug,

    Yes sorry this is what I have done, ive only sketched half it and want to mirror the other half. However where there should be space Creo has made a solid wall along the datum which is being used as the mirroring reference.

    Will try and upload photo to better explain.

    T
    TomD.inPDX17-Peridot
    17-Peridot
    January 8, 2015

    I've seen this "union" happened in the past. Very annoying. Personally, I consider it is bug.

    Feel free to report a support case and include the file. They might have some tips on how to avoid this.

    Of course, when I try to reproduce this, it doesn't do it

    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement