Skip to main content
B
bcat1-Visitor
1-Visitor
March 12, 2020
Question

one surface instead four

  • March 12, 2020
  • 3 replies
  • 3325 views

hello

 

i have a little problem ; i want to create a single surface instead four is posible ?

 

i attach picture for better understanding

3 replies

M
MartinHanak24-Ruby III
24-Ruby III
March 12, 2020
@bcat wrote:

hello

 

i have a little problem ; i want to create a single surface instead four is posible ?

 

i attach picture for better understanding

Hi,

please describe how did you create the surface.

B
bcat1-VisitorAuthor
1-Visitor
March 12, 2020

i created surface with boundary blend

tbraxton
22-Sapphire II
tbraxton22-Sapphire II
22-Sapphire II
March 12, 2020

If you used a 4 sided boundary blend then it is one surface. The lines within the boundary are likely the result of changes in the surface properties (isoparms). Not a definitive diagnosis from your picture only, would need to look at the model to be sure.

 

In order to not get the lines within the boundary you will need to "clean" up your boundary curves.

B
bcat1-VisitorAuthor
1-Visitor
March 12, 2020

in the fille 1 is the definition for boundaryblend

in the fille 2 is the result i want if is posible

tbraxton
22-Sapphire II
tbraxton22-Sapphire II
22-Sapphire II
March 12, 2020

Try the following.

1) Make copies of the boundary curves using approximate option. (if the curve is a linear segment this is not needed)

2) Create the boundary blend using the approximate curves.

B
BHOoi16-Pearl
16-Pearl
March 14, 2020

Could you please provide part file with the curves you used to create that surface? Curve approximation may be one way but it may give you geom check error in the subsequent surface merges. I would like to look at your curves and try it out. Thanks

Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement