Skip to main content
dcox-21-Visitor
1-Visitor
February 25, 2015
Question

Speeding up family table verification

  • February 25, 2015
  • 12 replies
  • 4143 views

I am writing this whilst waiting for a family table to verify. We use FTs quite a lot but find that assembly ones can take a long time (~20 minutes) to verify, I'm interested to know if anyone has any tips to speed this up.

 

Typically our assembly FTs will have around 30-50 instances and include maybe 5 or 6 family tabled components or sub-assemblies. The overall assemblies aren't that big, typically around 25 components.

 

If anyone has any methods for speeding up FT verification, please let me know. Using Creo 2, M120

 

Thanks.
David


This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.

12 replies

ClintWalton1-Visitor
1-Visitor
February 26, 2015

David,

Are you linked to Windchill? If so, backup the models locally and then verify the family table during an unlinked session. If you see an improvement you can then reach out to the Windchill community for their advice.

dcox-21-VisitorAuthor
1-Visitor
February 27, 2015

Yes, it does typically run faster outside of WC; we still have some model ranges that we have not brought into WC yet and they are faster to verify.

We have been able to make some improvements, for instance we have a mass parameter that is created by a relation from PRO_MP_MASS. This used to be an Initial relation so we had to verify the table twice for the instances' mass to update, but we moved it to Post-Regen so we now only have to verify once.

ClintWalton1-Visitor
1-Visitor
March 21, 2015

David Cox‌ Did moving the relations to Post-Regen improve the speed enough that that this is no longer an issue?

Were you able to get any performance suggestions from the Windchill Community?

dcox-21-VisitorAuthor
1-Visitor
March 23, 2015

The big benefit of moving the rels to post-regen was that we now only need to do the verification once (to allow weight parameters to update); it hasn't made the verification itself any faster.

We do know that working from our hard drives is faster than off Windchill. Our main Windchill server is located in the US - we are in the UK. We have a replica server on site here for the CAD data, and there has been some effort made lately to improve the performance of that server so I'm not sure there's a lot more we can gain there.

I haven't heard any other suggestions from the community, at this point I'm thinking there's not much more we can do to improve it.

dschenken1-Visitor
1-Visitor
March 23, 2015

Try talking to the Product Manager for Creo and ask for profiling tools to record memory and cpu usage for each feature as it is regenerated to see where the time is being spent. Perhaps if he hears it from one more person he will finally catch on.

Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement