Skip to main content
T
tleati12-Amethyst
12-Amethyst
March 13, 2018
Solved

Subassemblies simulation features not visible at upper level

  • March 13, 2018
  • 1 reply
  • 3894 views

Hello,

 

I am trying to simulate an assembly (composed by subassemblies), but I don't see, at the upper level, the simulation entities which were defined in its subassemblies (rigid links, points...ie simulation features).

 

It seems it doesn't even recognize them, as the icon of the sim features is not even visible at upper level.

 

I enclose (and attach) a video to try to make it clearer:

 

(view in My Videos)

 

If it may make a difference, the asm is structured with simp reps both at subasm level and at master level.

 

Anyone has experienced this issue? how could I solve this?

 

thanks

    Best answer by SweetPeasHub

    Two simplified Reps, exactly the same parts excluded and included as master, but defined two different ways.

    Derived = use Def: (abbreviation for default)

     

    THIS REP WILL PROMOTE SIMULATION ENTITIES UPWARD

    .Simplified Rep Definition.JPG

     

    THIS REP WILL NOT PROMOTE SIMULATION ENTITIES UPWARD


    Simplified Rep Definition way 2.JPG

    1 reply

    S
    SweetPeasHub17-Peridot
    17-Peridot
    March 13, 2018

    I don't know if this is something new in the functionality because I don't remember having this issue but I was able to re-create it.  I found that the DEF: EXCLUDE was the problem (in the sub-assembly REP) and changing to DEF: MASTER REP corrected the issue.  This way can be a little tedious if you have many excluded items but you can multi-select and right click to change the state.  This behavior is good to know because it is a way to control the propagation up to an assembly.

      T
      tleati12-AmethystAuthor
      12-Amethyst
      March 13, 2018

      Hi SweetPeaHub,

       

      thanks for your reply.

      I don't exactly get what are you meaning with changing to master rep and how could I do it. If I got well, should I remove the simp rep for the subasm and work just with the master rep?

      My intention at the beginning was to define simulation features and entities on each subasm (defined inside its own FEM rep), and then work at the master level with almost just constraints and loads to define.

       

       

      S
      SweetPeasHub17-PeridotAnswer
      17-Peridot
      March 13, 2018

      Two simplified Reps, exactly the same parts excluded and included as master, but defined two different ways.

      Derived = use Def: (abbreviation for default)

       

      THIS REP WILL PROMOTE SIMULATION ENTITIES UPWARD

      .Simplified Rep Definition.JPG

       

      THIS REP WILL NOT PROMOTE SIMULATION ENTITIES UPWARD


      Simplified Rep Definition way 2.JPG

        Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement