Windchill PTC names & file parameters

I've debated about using the Windchill Name (Creo Common Name) parameter to either replace or drive our Creo DESCRIPTION parameter.

Pros:

• Being able to rename your CAD or drawings Title/Description from Windchill
• Not having to create Windchill Views everywhere for your company's DESCRIPTION parameter

Cons:

• The entire history of the object will get changed during a Windchill Rename for the Windchill Name, Number, and File Name - aka you can change your drawing history especially if you use Windchill PDF publishing. The Windchill DESCRIPTION (if designated from Creo and driven by a relation from Creo Common Name) will likely NOT change during a rename even though autopublished PDFs and Creo will have the new DESCRIPTION since changing Windchill parameters usually requires a check in.
• Having users convert drawings over time to the new standard. Unless you can use ModelCheck or something similar, you'll likely get some CAD converted when users make changes and some not.
• Having to train users to use Creo/Windchill Rename commands any time they would want to change the title/description of an object.
• Having to train users not to use the same part number for Windchill Name, File Name, and Number (we currently have them use the same for all values).

I'm in the camp where these CONs outweigh the Pros. I'd be currious on other people's thought on this though.

Side note: it seems like people use multiple title/description parameters (TITLE_1 and TITLE_2) to be able to show parameter on multiple lines in a drawing title block. Creo Drawing Tables have a 'Wrap Text' text setting that can allow a single parameter to wrap accross multiple lines.