Skip to main content

2 replies

24-Ruby III
December 17, 2021

@hhiller @jchelle @aoualim Could you please help with this?

17-Peridot
December 17, 2021

Hi,

This works for me in CREO8.

Maybe the issue is one of load timing.

First the preload needs to be applied, then when the preload is at its full value, the 0.1N sliding load is applied.

When I use the default "Time Dependence" of RAMP the analysis will not successfully run.

Here is a more correct time dependence.

 

Preload (1MPa)                  Pull  (0.1N)

Time    Value                      Time   Value

0          0                             0         0

0.5       1                             0.5      0

1          1                             1         1

 

Results Creo7Results Creo7

 

I also ran with the pull at 500N instead of 0.1N.  Although there was some movement, complete sliding was reported at 400N but not at 300N. (the analysis of course failed at 400N because it just displaces to infinity.)

 

hopefully this helps.

skunks
19-Tanzanite
December 20, 2021

In Creo 8, Advanced would be in T5
I am too poor...😂

17-Peridot
February 16, 2022

You can order Simulation Advanced separately. I believe it is a little savings over going T5, depending on what level you are jumping from.

For us, the contact with friction is only one of the several reasons we need and justify advanced simulation like forced frequency analysis, advanced springs, large deformations to name a few. However, when it comes to more advanced continuous sliding contact we generally use conventional FEA software.