Skip to main content
6-Contributor
July 14, 2026
Question

Non-Configurable State Transitions in Test Run Reviews

  • July 14, 2026
  • 2 replies
  • 38 views

The Test Run Review workflow follows a fixed process, offering no flexibility to customize state transitions to align with project-specific review governance.

2 replies

Community Moderator
July 29, 2026

Hi ​@RJ_14168288,

Thank you for your question. 

Your post has not yet received any response. I am replying to raise awareness. Hopefully, another community member will be able to help.

Also, feel free to add any additional information you think might be relevant. It sometimes helps to have screenshots to better understand what you are trying to do.

Thanks,
Vivek N
Community Moderation Team

Glenda_SAI
7-Bedrock
July 29, 2026

Hi RJ! You might want to consider posting this in the Codebeamer Ideas board with a bit more detail. Things I might suggest thinking about are

  • if there is room for flexibility in the review process (or what the true goal of the review governance is)
  • if the true goal is visibility within the review process and how you would like to see things within review process (reports, views, or a kanban style board, etc)

Sometimes we think we are solving one problem with governance, and it helps to think through what the governance solves first, and how we intend the oversight to solve the problem. Good luck!