Skip to main content
1-Visitor
September 21, 2016
Question

3D plot visualisation

Hello,

I am trying to do a 3d plot of an m x n matrix. I know that each point is plotted as an elevation on the z axe versus its respecctive row (x axis) and column y axis index. The values in the matrix are very diffrent, i mean i have -62 1.2 1 and 5.7 *10^9,  and i don't find for example the poin (1,1,-62) on the plot. Is it because the max values are so diffrent from the min values? Thank you

7 replies

19-Tanzanite
September 21, 2016

Please post the worksheet. It's all but impossible to give you any advice without seeing the problem.

Translate
isavu1-VisitorAuthor
1-Visitor
September 21, 2016

This is the data that i was talking about. I don't think that point is visible due to the differences between the max and min values.

Translate
23-Emerald V
September 21, 2016

Iulia Savu wrote:

Hello,

I am trying to do a 3d plot of an m x n matrix. I know that each point is plotted as an elevation on the z axe versus its respecctive row (x axis) and column y axis index. The values in the matrix are very diffrent, i mean i have -62 1.2 1 and 5.7 *10^9,  and i don't find for example the poin (1,1,-62) on the plot. Is it because the max values are so diffrent from the min values? Thank you

Very Likely.

Can you manually set the lower limit in Prime?  Here's what you get when you turn off Auto Grid in M15.   You still can't really make out which values are the smallest, but at least you can see what the minimum value is.

Stuart

Translate
isavu1-VisitorAuthor
1-Visitor
September 21, 2016

Even if i set the lower limit to -70 lets say, i will still not be able to visualize the point due to the high diffrence.

Translate
12-Amethyst
September 21, 2016

Hi Lulia.

Can try with a logarithmic scale, after translate for avoid nonpositive values.

Best regards.

Alvaro.

Translate
Werner_E
25-Diamond I
September 22, 2016

> and i don't find for example the poin (1,1,-62) on the plot.

Possibly because its the point (0/0/-62). Indices run beginning from 0, not from 1, when ORIGIN is set (by default) to 0.

And this point of course looks like the origin (0/0/0) because -62 is so small compared to other values in your field.

Translate
isavu1-VisitorAuthor
1-Visitor
September 23, 2016

Yep, i think you are correct,    Thanks for the help everyone.

Translate