Skip to main content
Best answer by wayne

OK,

Thats as close as the solvers could get, with a resulting tension of 11.55k in the Cable, which is not too bad for design.

If I iterate around the solution above little by hand, pertty easily I get: L=1931.794m, and a cable tension of 11.005k.

(just to be difficlult, 2000m is a round number, but 6561.68 ft is not)

Inputting the corresponding values into your program, they are in agreement,

12 replies

1-Visitor
April 20, 2011

Clipboard01.jpg

Mike

Message was edited by: Mike Armstrong

24-Ruby IV
April 20, 2011

Mike Armstrong wrote:

Clipboard01.jpg

Mike

Message was edited by: Mike Armstrong

Sorry, no! We have not onebut two point of the chain fixing on thr horizontal bar!

I think about this task when I see this picture:

GGB.png

1-Visitor
April 20, 2011

Valery Ochkov wrote:

Mike Armstrong wrote:

Clipboard01.jpg

Mike

Message was edited by: Mike Armstrong

Sorry, no! We have not onebut two point of the chain fixing on thr horizontal bar!

I think about this task when I see this picture:

GGB.png

How about half of 2243m then?

Maybe a little more information is required. When talking about the breaking load of the chain, wouldn't the mode of failure usually be tension. Or are you talking about failure at the connections?

Mike

12-Amethyst
April 21, 2011

Valary,

hows 2000m sound?

See attached.

Thanks,

Wayne

24-Ruby IV
April 22, 2011

Wayne Reid wrote:

Valary,

hows 2000m sound?

See attached.

Thanks,

Wayne

Thanks Wayne for the solution!

But sorry Lmax=2000 m is so round

See in attach my function for the chain tension!

wayne12-AmethystAnswer
12-Amethyst
April 22, 2011

OK,

Thats as close as the solvers could get, with a resulting tension of 11.55k in the Cable, which is not too bad for design.

If I iterate around the solution above little by hand, pertty easily I get: L=1931.794m, and a cable tension of 11.005k.

(just to be difficlult, 2000m is a round number, but 6561.68 ft is not)

Inputting the corresponding values into your program, they are in agreement,