Skip to main content
Community Manager
November 10, 2016
Question

Changes in PTC's November Web Release: Your Case Opening Experience, Related Content in Articles, and More

  • November 10, 2016
  • 39 replies
  • 12753 views

This Thursday November 10th, a new set of improvements to your web experience at PTC will be rolled out. These include changes to the PTC Case Logger, Knowledge Base Articles and more.

 

New Case Logger

After encouraging results from a proof of concept earlier this year, we're simplifying the case opening process, and using some advanced technology, which we call "Dylan", to give you the best chances of solving your issue on the spot. Dylan takes questions and issue descriptions in natural language and suggests high confidence solutions, based on the associations our engineers have made in the past for similar cases. Descriptions in English and all major European languages are handled, and if any of the results is associated with a pending recommendation for one of your connected products, it will be highlighted.

 

In case Dylan doesn't come up with a suitable solution, or if you still have questions, you can continue to the next page to open a case. The engineer you work with will review the solutions already shown before contacting you, saving time for everyone.

 

FAQs:

 

1. Does this tool replace the Index Search ?

No. Index Search is still PTC's one-stop repository, quickly serving rich content which can be easily filtered and navigated. As well as articles, the index search contains help center topics, reference documents, community threads, video tutorials and more. We recommend starting here to find answers to any questions you have about PTC's products.

 

2. How can I get the most relevant articles when using the new case logger?

Because the engine behind the scenes is processing natural language, plain descriptions as you would explain to an engineer handling your case work best, and longer descriptions also usually give better results than shorter ones.

 

3. What is the underlying technology?

The PTC Datalabs team used a neural network algorithm and deep learning technologies to create finely tuned "models" specifically for PTC's products.

The model "learns" the words and word arrangements used to describe problems over many years, and importantly, the association with a specific article.

Dylan is not a search engine. In fact, it can happen that some articles suggested will not contain any the words entered in an issue description or question, but will still be relevant. Dylan finds hidden relationships between words to direct us to solutions.

 

Articles: Related Content Expanded

 

Last release, we introduced a new dimension to the article viewer to show other content sources such as Product Documentation, Help Topics, and Community Threads which are referencing the current article. As this feature was heavily used, we decided to expand the scope, adding a section called "Others also liked". As the name suggests, once a handful of readers have liked the article you're reading, and share common likes of other articles, we'll display them for you to explore.

 

Here's a short video to introduce both of the above features:

 

 

Other Changes this Release

 

For a full set of release notes for the November 10th ("16.4") web release, see here.

 

Feedback

In case you have feedback about the new case logging experience, affinity-related content in articles, or any of the other changes in this release we'd love to hear it. Please use comments on this post, or open an Idea in this Community Group. We're constantly looking to incorporate your suggestions as we iterate and continually improve this service.

39 replies

15-Moonstone
January 9, 2017

I've been noticing that when I search in the knowledgebase for the issue I'm having, there are usually several articles that are close, but that either don't address it exactly, or if they do, the solution does not work in the build I'm using.  Then, when I go to Dylan to create a case, none of those more relevant articles appear in the list; only ones that usually have nothing to do with the issue.  Next time I open a case, I'll provide some specific examples, but for the time being, it appears that Dylan is not helpful to people who know what to look for.

PeterCaseCommunity ManagerAuthor
Community Manager
January 10, 2017

Hi Domingo, I've generated a report of the descriptions you entered last month as well as the cases which were eventually opened, and asked our Creo Technical Leader to investigate and establish where this is failing. We should hear something back soon.

If you do have further specific examples to share, especially those where a resolution article clearly exists but is not found, we'd appreciate any details you have to share.

5-Regular Member
January 12, 2017

Hello Domingo, I've looked at the feedback that you've provided in the past 3 months and seen several articles have been improved following your feedback so thank you for providing it and helping to improve our knowledge base. I noticed two occasions where no action was taken to update the article or inform you of that decision so I will follow up on those. We chose not to automatically open a case for every comment left on an article because not all comments warrant follow up. We get a lot of "thanks, that helped" feedback!

15-Moonstone
January 12, 2017

Ah, I didn't consider people just saying thanks.

Perhaps instead of just asking "Did this help? Y/N" there could be more options like:

Yes, it helped.  Thanks!

No, please open a case.

No, not relevant to my search/issue.

In addition to helping figure out if users are finding the information they need, it would allow the direct feedback on article errors.

15-Moonstone
January 12, 2017

I guess I have noticed a couple responses to articles that have resulted in updates, which is ideally how every comment should be handled.

However, this is what I'm accustomed to getting:

Hi Mr. Hermosillo,
--------------------
Customer Feedback:      < This does not describe how to work around the issue. The document says there there is only one coincident constraint, but that is not what we are seeing functionally. It seems like there is Coincident <flip no> (Align)and Coincident <flip yes> (Mate). It seems like an easy fix for PTC to map these to the old constraints. Or is this document saying that it's always Coincident <flip no> (Align) and any other state has to be flipped during the assembly process? Please clarify.>

Article #:                             <134149>

--------------------
Thank you for taking the time to submit your feedback on this article.
We at PTC Technical Support have reviewed the feedback that was submitted for Knowledge Base Article <CS#####> and would like to work with you to understand why the article resolution did not work for you.
Please visit our
E-Support Portal and open up a new case using the Link to “Log a New Case”. Please include any errors/ issues etc. that you ran into when following the Steps documented in our Article. Please note that replies to this email address will not be monitored.
We appreciate your effort in helping us improve the quality of our articles.
Regards,
PTC Technical Support
To search articles in knowledge base, visit
http://support.ptc.com/
To report new issues through the web, visit
http://support.ptc.com/ and click on Create a New Support Case
This e-mail message may contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the named addressee(s) and any use or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the e-mail.
Thank you.

Best Regards

I ended up opening a case for this one but, sometimes, if it's just a small issue that doesn't have a very big impact on me, I don't take the extra time to open a case.

Marco Tosin
21-Topaz I
21-Topaz I
January 17, 2017

Hi Heidi,

today I received an email from TS about the comment I wrote some days ago on article https://support.ptc.com/appserver/cs/view/solution.jsp?source=subscription&n=CS17670

This was my comment:

It is possible to achieve the same result with a query builder report?

In affirmative case, can you please share a sample to this article?

Before reply to my request, please take a look at my comment of November 17th and the subsequent response by Heidi Khetani on this discussion https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/groups/ptc-esupport-help/blog/2016/11/09/your-case-opening-experience-simplified-and-improved?sr=inbox&ru=4371#comment-28355

Thanks.



This was the answer from TS:

We at PTC Technical Support have reviewed the feedback that was submitted for Knowledge Base Article <17670>  and would like to work with you to understand why the article resolution did not work for you.



What else should I write to have the right answer?

Marco
15-Moonstone
January 24, 2017

Here's one I just got on a comment that I made about the solution not working.  The response does not include my original comment, so that is lost to the ether, it does not address the issue, and it doesn't open a case.  These are the types of responses that are particularly angering because the feedback that PTC claims to appreciate is completely lost.  Also, there's a link to an unrelated website in the subject:

; ">  Domingo Hermosillo
From: cs_ptc <->
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 1:52 AM
To: Domingo Hermosillo
Subject: [EXTERNAL] AF-14332 for https://login.salesforce.com/kA1F0000000Y2Ob
Hi Mr. Hermosillo,
--------------------
Customer Feedback: AF-14332
Article #: 185093
--------------------
Thank you for taking the time to submit your feedback on this article.
We at PTC Technical Support have reviewed the feedback that was submitted for Knowledge Base Article CS185093 and would like to
work with you to understand why the article resolution did not work for you. Please visit our E-Support Portal and open up a new case
using the Link to “Log a New Case”. Please include any errors/ issues etc. that you ran into when following the Steps documented in
our Article. Please note that replies to this email address will not be monitored.
We appreciate your effort in helping us improve the quality of our articles.
Regards,
PTC Technical Support
To search articles in knowledge base, visit http://support.ptc.com/
To report new issues through the web, visit http://support.ptc.com/ and click on Create a New Support Case
This e-mail message may contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the named
addressee(s) and any use or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender
immediately and destroy all copies of the e-mail. Thank you.

5-Regular Member
February 16, 2017

Hello Marco,

Sorry for the delay, I have been out of the office recently. I have been in contact with the engineer that handled your feedback and I believe they have since updated the article and been in touch with you. I will be further following up with our teams internally to review our processes for responding to article feedback.

15-Moonstone
February 21, 2017

I just got another response to feedback on an article where I provided a link to the Idea created for the issue, but got a canned message saying that I needed to open a support case or create an idea.  Since there is no way to reply to the sender, it makes this doubly frustrating that he didn't take the time to understand what was needed, and that there is no chance for two-way communication.

From: cs_ptc [mailto:-]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 1:04 AM
To: Domingo Hermosillo <dhermosillo@blueorigin.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Your Feedback on Article <000024949>

Hi Hermosillo,
--------------------
Customer Feedback:      <Customer Feedback>

: Please add the Idea to the document: https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/ideas/1327

Article #:                             < 000024949>

--------------------
Thank you for taking the time to submit your feedback on this article.
We at PTC Technical Support have reviewed the feedback that was submitted for Knowledge Base Article <CS
24949> and tell you that product idea should be submitted by user not by PTC engineer. Please note that replies to this email address will not be monitored.
We appreciate your effort in helping us improve the quality of our articles.
Regards,
PTC Technical Support
To search articles in knowledge base, visit
http://support.ptc.com/
To report new issues through the web, visit
http://support.ptc.com/ and click on Create a New Support Case
This e-mail message may contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the named addressee(s) and any use or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the e-mail. Thank you.

Marco Tosin
21-Topaz I
21-Topaz I
February 22, 2017

Hello Heidi,

yes, the article has been updated after my last comment.

Thanks for your attention

Marco