cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Community Tip - Need to share some code when posting a question or reply? Make sure to use the "Insert code sample" menu option. Learn more! X

solve mesh equation

MP_11950640
4-Participant

solve mesh equation

Can anybody please help. 🙂

 

i cant seem til solve this one.

  • The DC generator in Figure 2 can deliver a maximum current of 21 amperes. rGr_GrG and rBr_BrB symbolize the internal resistances of the generator windings and the accumulator.

Task 2.1:

Determine the value of R3 when the generator delivers maximum current.

Task 2.2:

Determine the power dissipated in the generator's windings when it delivers maximum current.

10 REPLIES 10
ppal
17-Peridot
(To:MP_11950640)

Not Checked if correct!

But write some node equations to get the summation of currents at the nodes:

 

ppal_0-1732050067494.png

 

 

Werner_E
25-Diamond I
(To:ppal)

@ppal 

In your system there always will be  I3= IG and R3 is not used at all and will remain at its guess value.

Werner_E
25-Diamond I
(To:MP_11950640)

Given your input values, R3 would come out as being infinite! Thats the reason the solve block fails.

Slightly changing one of the input values (in the picture I had chosen to change R1) and increasing the guess value for R3) makes the solve block work and we see that R3 is already pretty large.

Werner_E_0-1732050770956.png

 

You could also solve the system symbolically

Werner_E_1-1732050816293.png

The last expression for R3 throws a division by zero error if evaluated with your input values.

 

BTW, the result given with the slightly altered value for R1 is quite similar to what we get if we use "minerr" instead of "solve".

Werner_E_2-1732050932518.png

But I guess that you should rather check your input values and/or the correctness of your equations.

 

Shouldn't it be I1=I3+I4 and not I1=I3+I5 ???

Werner_E_0-1732052184896.png

 

 

LucMeekes
23-Emerald III
(To:Werner_E)

In this purely resistive system, none of the currents should be larger (in absolute value) than the maximum current that the generator can deliver: 21 A.

 

Luc

Werner_E
25-Diamond I
(To:LucMeekes)


@LucMeekes wrote:

In this purely resistive system, none of the currents should be larger (in absolute value) than the maximum current that the generator can deliver: 21 A.

 

Luc


Good argument 😉

LucMeekes
23-Emerald III
(To:MP_11950640)

Hey Michael,

 

You can do:

LucMeekes_3-1732056487947.png

Then:

LucMeekes_4-1732056573473.png

and:

LucMeekes_5-1732056595639.png

now you can solve for maximum Ig:

LucMeekes_6-1732056630964.png

And then calculate:

LucMeekes_7-1732056795642.png

LucMeekes_8-1732056805146.png

(Plot:

LucMeekes_9-1732056917961.png

)

 

I think you can work out the power loss in the generator yourself.

 

Success!
Luc

 

 

ppal
17-Peridot
(To:MP_11950640)

ppal_0-1732067087437.png

 

ttokoro
20-Turquoise
(To:MP_11950640)

image.pngimage.png

 

Werner_E
25-Diamond I
(To:ttokoro)

@ttokoro 

The solution to Task 2.1 is not 0 ohm because the current the generator can deliver is limited to 21 A according to what the poster wrote (the information also seems to be in that Danish text in the picture).
The solution for 2.1 was already given by @LucMeekes  and later also by @ppal .

 

But we get the same results as yours with the very equations @MP_11950640  had set up (apart from the wrong node equation which I already mentioned and which may be a typo).

Main error was the the OP used a fix constant value of 1A for IG and solved for R3 while he rather should have solved for IG and make the solve block dependable of a variable R3.

Werner_E_0-1732112397893.png

 

Now that we have a function IG(R3) its easy to determine the resistance which yields the 21 A. We can use 'root' to do the job

Werner_E_1-1732113483004.png

 

 

Prime 10 sheet attached

 

@MP_11950640   Could you work out a solution to the problem you posted here: Assistance Needed with Adjusting Axes

Werner_E
25-Diamond I
(To:Werner_E)

Looks like I was drawn away by this thread and got lost...

Coming back to the original question we can say that just two errors have to be corrected:

1) wrong index 5 in one of the node equations

2) wrong value for IG was provided - it must be 21 A and not 1 A

Fixing these two makes the solve block work and yields the correct result for R3. No other changes necessary.

Werner_E_1-1732114186928.png

 

 

Announcements

Top Tags