Skip to main content
1-Visitor
June 7, 2011
Question

Intralink 3.4 WF4 and Model Check parameters

  • June 7, 2011
  • 1 reply
  • 585 views
>
> So, we were trying WF4 on intralink 3.4 and started to get issues with
> model check parameters.
> •*Attribute MODEL_CHECK, MC_MODE parameters cannot **be propagated to
> XXXX part modification made in the PDM **system will be ignored. *
> *
> *
> I searched and found some notes on changing the configuration file say no
> on these:
>
> ADD_ERR_PARM, ADD_CONFIG_PARM, ADD_DATE_PARM andADD_MODE_PARM to N
>
> but I created a new part and did model check on it and it still created
> those parameters.
>
> I actually do want it to create the parameters so that it "works" but I
> want pro/e to ignore what ever issues it has with the parameters on parts
> that I did not modify. yeah when i modify the parts, the message goes away
> but that would have me mass updating most parts and I do not want to do
> that.
>
> Help?! anybody?
>
> regards,
>
> Alfonso
>

1 reply

1-Visitor
June 8, 2011

Hi Alfonso



We'd also be interested if you have any useful replies on this: we have many thousands of parts with modelcheck parameters that we may not want to take forward with us from Intralink to PDMLink...


Regards
Edwin Muirhead
CAD Manager, Weatherford



In Reply to alfonso medina:


>
> So, we were trying WF4 on intralink 3.4 and started to get issues with
> model check parameters.
> •*Attribute MODEL_CHECK, MC_MODE parameters cannot **be propagated to
> XXXX part modification made in the PDM **system will be ignored. *
> *
> *
> I searched and found some notes on changing the configuration file say no
> on these:
>
> ADD_ERR_PARM, ADD_CONFIG_PARM, ADD_DATE_PARM andADD_MODE_PARM to N
>
> but I created a new part and did model check on it and it still created
> those parameters.
>
> I actually do want it to create the parameters so that it "works" but I
> want pro/e to ignore what ever issues it has with the parameters on parts
> that I did not modify. yeah when i modify the parts, the message goes away
> but that would have me mass updating most parts and I do not want to do
> that.
>
> Help?! anybody?
>
> regards,
>
> Alfonso
>