Skip to main content
J
JohnSullivan1-Visitor
1-Visitor
May 14, 2010
Question

Friday Rant

  • May 14, 2010
  • 23 replies
  • 3685 views

As a long time user of proe and a having a continuous rant on:

The extra clicks that we have to go thru when we want to leave a feature or delete something.

Yes, when weclick on "delete" I really want to delete the feature!!!!!

Whenwe want to leave a feature "incomplete" yeswe really want to leave a feature incomplete!!!!!

Yes, when I want to leave sketcher, I really want to leave sketcher and all the other "do you really want to's and we have tomouse click our way outwhatever we are trying to leave andthat we have to go thru, please give me an option to turn off all these annoying mouse clicks! i'm a veteren user and I know what I'm doing!

And I'm not even talking about the mouse travel!! Click on something and a window pops up ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE SCREEN! Hello carpel tunnel ___

I will be atOrlando, is anyone interested in meeting on this? let meknow. WF 5is no better.

John


This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.

23 replies

Show previous replies
P
ptc-5936191-Visitor
1-Visitor
May 14, 2010
I, too have had the WF5 demo and was told how much they have reduced the
mouse clicks and mouse travel. I asked the Demo guy how many clicks to
cancel out of a sketch. After his 6 clicks I mentioned that it used to
take just one - improvement, we aren't even back to where we once were.



And the only thing that "ribbon" is good for is utter confusion!


J
jstarkey1-Visitor
1-Visitor
May 14, 2010
I am a contract mold/plastic part designer.

I totally and completely agree with the below.

Best regards,
James Starkey
Starkey Tech. Serv., L.L.C.


E
ehill1-Visitor
1-Visitor
May 14, 2010
This is the very first "usability enhancement" that I turned off when Wildfire came along. I don't know how everyone else deals with it, it's beyond annoying, and never prehighlights what I want
anyway.


Here's my rant:

Everything that is pushed by PTC, consultants, design guides, whoever you ask, recommends to use surfaces as references whenever possible. Next, edges, then vertexes...all in the quest for model stability.

Why oh why does a query select return a list of VERTICES first? Then edges? Then surfaces LAST? It's bass ackward.

Best Regards,
K
kwsauter1-Visitor
1-Visitor
May 14, 2010
Amen to that! And how about tab order in the parameter list? it jumps
all over the place. There is no logical order. Using the keyboard to
navigate is impossible. And how about the global interference dialog
where the list of interferences that shows up is always proportional to
the size of the dialog box? I can stretch the dialog box to cover the
screen and the list of interferences is only about ten items long.
There is room to show fifty items at least, but the dialog box won't do
it. This stuff is just plain stupid. It can't be very difficult to fix
these things, but they never do.


Ken Sauter
DRS Reconnaissance Surveillance and Target Acquisition
Infrared Technologies Division
PO Box 740188
Dallas, TX 75374
214-860-6826
- <">mailto:->
W
wattsteam1-Visitor
1-Visitor
May 14, 2010
I have been a full time ProE user since 1993.

No question in my mind that ProE is probably still the highest capability package, but there are four areas that PTC is consistently terrible in, and should fix:

1. Stop screwing around with the front end/GUI (I do dozens of workarounds in WF to get back pre-WF functionality)
2. Not fixing existing issues and not improving basic functions on a timely basis, while pushing PDM software aggressively
3. technical support offshore is absolutely awful
4. value for maintenance charge dollar is extremely low for installs with few seats

For those who remember Computervision and their fall from greatness/number 1 position in the CAD world - I see a lot of parallels between what the management of CV said and did and what the management of PTC says and does.

My favourite PTC customer service behaviour is to be reporting a serious-to-me functional problem and be told "that is design intent of the software" - for who, Martians?

end of rant

Jeff Dayman
S
sneg36911-Visitor
1-Visitor
May 14, 2010
Yes we know that...once the preselect is turned off, then you are working
blinding because now they have taken away the query select when preselecting
is turned off...exactly my point..we have to create map keys upon map keys
to get anything thing half way accomplished. Preselecting is mans worse
nightmare when working on imported geometry, or mold extracts ..if its not
the preselecting then its chasing the model all over the screen because
somehow it fell off he screen..we all been there...it just kills me the
price that is paid for maintenance by all of us and they give us this -----




_____
J
jlippeth1-Visitor
1-Visitor
May 14, 2010
** Rank <start>

And what about Over_All model size from Model Check to output more then
2 decimal places, C'Mon Man

6.5 years and counting, Tic Toc , blah blah blah

And a Friday rant is sometimes more about the rant then finding a
solution, but good solutions are always welcome!

** Rank <end>



JScott

This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
J
jstarkey1-Visitor
1-Visitor
May 14, 2010
As a mold designer, I agree with the below.

I ask for and turned in a enhancement request for a config.pro setting or something, that would return selection functionality to Pre-WF. This for those of us with similar concerns, working on a lot of huge imported files and mold extracts.

I even followed up with Michael Campbell. Got no where!!!!!!!

Best regards,
James Starkey
Starkey Tech. Serv., L.L.C.

A
amedina1-Visitor
1-Visitor
May 14, 2010
Have you ever tried the difference between being connected to PDMlink and
not? Its like night and day. Its like they added a "slow down" clause when
working on PDMlink vs off of it. For anything, for extrude or sheet metal
operations what have you, its always slow on PDMlink and fast off it. I
really like to be told that it is because I'm working on rev 8 and rev 10 is
so much better. that's it, that's all my venting... hey there have been 130
rants since 2006 according to my email here, that's kinda curious to know.
Some one should put together what each one was about and then sell the book
as a way to gage whether you need the next build yet. That or one of those
utube vids where they show you a time line of software release and then the
update rate, but instead of update rate it would be the complaints about
that release. That would gage how well the next update is working. hey its
not all rating, I'm trying to give something positive here.

here is a cool one:


I wish I could do this with my assemblies.. well I can, I just need time,
because all the data is in the oracle database, you just have to make a
graphical video of it somehow. Processing.org is a cool Java code that can
do stuff like this. PDMlink should incorporate it some day.

L
lwh1-Visitor
1-Visitor
May 15, 2010

As a ProE user for over 15 Years I totally agree with all of You. Sometimes I get the impression that I know more about the workings of ProE than the support people...

I'm working with one of the big ProE customers and even their pleas go unheard.

Let's face it: The main reason is, people at PTC sell software, they never have to use it. So, their concern is to create features which look great to managers who make the purchasing decisions (but also do not use the product).

And for the concentration on Windchill: unlike ProE it also sells man-months of consulting, which is much more profitable than writing software (as I would know, doing both of it myself...)

BTW: I remember CADDS4x and CV / Prime - their decreasing interest in their users made us change to ProE - yes, PTC were better once...

Show more replies
Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement