Skip to main content
Best answer by ValeryOchkov

UK Mathcad Prime Minister is one user of our site about rockets calculation

See please more David Cameron watched Tim Peake's space launch and everyone's laughing at him - Mirror Online

DC-Rocket.png

10 replies

24-Ruby IV
October 18, 2015

Three stage rocket:

9-40-Rocket-3.png

17-Peridot
October 19, 2015

Hello Valery,

technically the Soyuz is a two-and-a-half (2 1/2) stages rocket as the four boosters start together with the core stage which continues running after the booster have separated. 🙂

Raiko

24-Ruby IV
October 19, 2015

Tanks, Raiko, I Know it. See please - Союз (ракета-носитель) — Википедия

I would like to solve this task with Союз with my students - see Московский лицей 1502. Класс 10-10

Can you help us? With Alvaro and... Isaak!

It is very interesting optimization problem. What is an objective function?!

PS

g=g(h(t), altitude)

See please my Mathcad Web-sheet http://twt.mpei.ac.ru/MCS/Worksheets/g-h-psi.xmcd

12-Amethyst
October 19, 2015

Hi Vallery. Nice example. I guess that what you can remark there is that the equation Force = mass x acceleration isn't true!. Newton equation is Force = dp/dt.

24-Ruby IV
October 19, 2015

AlvaroDíaz wrote:

Hi Vallery. Nice example. I guess that what you can remark there is that the equation Force = mass x acceleration isn't true!. Newton equation is Force = dp/dt.

Thanks, Alvaro.

See please One Rocket (пуск ракеты с подводной лодки)

sok-g.png

sok-wolfram.png

12-Amethyst
October 19, 2015

Hi Valery. Hope this helps.

Best regards.

rocket.gif

12-Amethyst
October 24, 2015

Well, attached my solutions.

Results agrees with Un cohete de empuje constante (pages uses java, chrome don't support java), but there g=0. About original Valery question, "which's the target" for optimize the rocket, I guess that he want the "perfect" rocket, avaible in the same web: El cohete "perfecto"

Best regards.

24-Ruby IV
October 25, 2015

9-37-F-m-a.png

12-Amethyst
October 25, 2015

Hi Valery. As usual, you're right. First solution gives the correct h,v. But, can you deduce from there the kinetics energy, for example? My point is that the relation F = - u*dm/dt gives the correct understanding, and the correct generalization for the Newton law F = dp/dt.

rocketjpg_Page1.jpg

Best regards.

17-Peridot
October 26, 2015

Hello Valery,

I have problems replicating your first equation in Mathcad 15. I got rid of the units by using UnitsOf(xyz) but still it doesn't compute. any advice what I'm doing wrong apart from not working enough with ODEs?

Raiko

Sorry, I forgot to add the sheet

24-Ruby IV
October 26, 2015
24-Ruby IV
October 27, 2015

With friction, one stage rocket (please see the picture and Mathcad 15 - Mathcad Prime sheets in attch)

Rocket-One-Friction.png

15-Moonstone
October 27, 2015
24-Ruby IV
October 27, 2015

Thanks, Денис, for links.

But my students need in first line not descriptions but how we can use math soft (Mathcad or Russian clone SMath) for some math problems... In absolute simple form...

I have had contacts with MapleSoft.

One result

Chemical Kinetics with Mathcad and Maple | Viktor Korobov | Springer

1-Visitor
October 31, 2015

The movement of the meteorite in the Earth's atmosphere with a view of the ablation

Безымянный.png

Meteor.png

It is interesting to note the sharp braking and intense pulsed energy of the meteoroid at low altitudes, as well as the trajectory in the final phase of flight.

24-Ruby IV
October 31, 2015

Fine!

Will be good to show one-two plots:

bol.png

1-Visitor
October 31, 2015

Thank you!

In my opinion, the most interesting are the destructive shock acceleration (~70g!)...

Ускорение.png

powerful thermal flash (10GW!) and a sharp decrease in weight...

Flash.png

mass.png

and a significant change in the trajectory at the end of the flight

trajector.png

Slow meteors. Frames with an interval of 10 seconds:

Video Link : 6493

1-Visitor
November 1, 2015

Unfortunately, Valery, the calculation is wrong - theoretical physicists in this film certainly take into account the effects of special relativity, mass at such speeds will change significantly and the relative velocity, too

24-Ruby IV
November 1, 2015

Alex Sokolov wrote:

Unfortunately, Valery, the calculation is wrong - theoretical physicists in this film certainly take into account the effects of special relativity, mass at such speeds will change significantly and the relative velocity, too.

Thanks, I know it.

Give please more correct calculations. With elements of Einstein theory.

1-Visitor
November 1, 2015

Формула Циолковского.png

Формула Циолковского2.png

sorry, but remaining calculations are too complex for me, besides no practical value, they do not have.

ValeryOchkov24-Ruby IVAuthorAnswer
24-Ruby IV
December 15, 2015

UK Mathcad Prime Minister is one user of our site about rockets calculation

See please more David Cameron watched Tim Peake's space launch and everyone's laughing at him - Mirror Online

DC-Rocket.png

24-Ruby IV
February 22, 2016

One question

1-Visitor
February 22, 2016

Не совсем понятно. Последнее выражение это v(t) в сокращенной записи. (а не y(x))

24-Ruby IV
February 22, 2016

An article for the journal "IT in school" - see please the attach.

Can somebody to translate it into English?

24-Ruby IV
April 10, 2020

One fine manual solution

Rocket.png