Creo+ and Creo Parametric

Is this type of attachment possible in PTC Creo? If yes kindly mention the procedure.    

I am using Creo Parametric - Release 3.0 (connected) 3.0 M120I would like to export the CAD assembly which can retain the original colors and make them an interactive model outside of Creo. What format do I need to save assembly?

I am using Creo Parametric - Release 3.0 M110I have an issue with an assembly and the corresponding drawing. Every time that I open up the drawing and/or the assembly model, two of the components (one is a part, the other is a subassembly) are hidden in the assembly. I can unhide both of these components without difficulty, either directly in the assembly model or in the drawing by going to the model tree and selecting unhide in model. After unhiding these components I save the drawing and the assembly model (we use ECTR as our PDM system). Unfortunately, when I open the drawing and/or model again, the same two components show up as hidden again. I've tried more times than I can count to fix this problem and we've investigated everything we can think of, to no avail.Any help would be appreciated!

I have parts and assemblies that were created without using our templates. There are about 5-10 parameters I need to add to these parts and assemblies.   I know that I can add them by just adding the parameters column to the model tree of the assembly. This does work, but is a bit of a pain because you have to tell it what kind of parameter it is for each part as you add each parameter.   I had mapkeys that would call open a config file set new_parameter_ui and New_relation_ui to no and then add the parameters. These mapkeys don't appear to work anymore (I thought I had fixed them for Creo 2, but that may have been for Wildfire 5.). Before I try to fix them, I was wondering if anyone is still using this method in Creo 3?   Or, is there a better method now that we are in Creo 3? Thanks,Carrie    

Hello,   I am new to Creo parametric. As of now, everytime I open a new Creo Parametric session, I have to explicitly register my standalone jlink application through Auxiliary Applications option under Tools menu. Is there a way to permanently register my application on Creo parametric so that I don't have to do that for every new creo session?   Thanks, Apoorva

I've created the part below by creating a planar and then adding a flange loop. As you can see in the second image, I've added a corner gap. However, the outer edge, circled red, has overlapping edges. How do I avoid this?

I am using Creo Parametric 6.0 6.0.5.1I just scaled a part. There is no Scale feature in the model tree. How am I or anyone suppose to know that a scaling took place? Where is this change recorded or documented? How can this change be undone in the future?

Hi, I am new to creo parametric. I need to bring the family table data in creo parametric to Thingworx foundation. Is it possible? If so how to do it?    Thanks in advance.

When trying to replace components in an Assembly using the API, if running ExecuteFeatureOps() is deprecated, what is the new method of replacing components? The example projects only show using ExecuteFeatureOps().

Hello Sirs: For the 2nd argument(ProUIDialogStyle) of  ProUIDialogDialogstyleSet(), there are 7 kinds of option for setting. I tried it with Article - CS276513, but didn't see obvious difference, would like to ask does any Sir has this function usage experience and please give me some instruction or suggestion. Thanks a lot.

Sometime between 7.0 and 4.0 Creo think tank decided to destroy our most useful sequence.  Surface Milling.  What was done for so long in Surface Milling now has to be done in Conventional Milling.  One can open an older project with surface milling in it, and it works fine.  Make a change to that sequence, such as an added or removed surface, and it "updates" to the new version of surface milling which appears to be useless.  This forces us to make a new conventional milling sequence.   Surface selection in conventional milling is unbelievably inefficient.  No more are the days of dragging a box around a group of surfaces to collect.  The tech support seems to push the Seed and Boundary method of collection.  This works OK for simple pockets with a flat plane at the top boundary.  If what you are milling has a varying top surface, it just doesn't work.  We have tons of projects that capture geometry via Mill Volumes.  To sele

Hi,I've got a huge problem with solidify operation in Creo Parametric 7.0. In general I have the solid body (usual rectangle made by Extrude) on which there's a varius-shaped surface that was created by copying geometry from the STEP file. When I'm trying to trim protruding parts of extrude by solidifying (with remove material option enabled) I've got the following error Please note that the green vertexes are not joined and there's a little bit place between them (the picture above has been zommed in much enough inside Creo in order to show this situation). These vertexes make my part unable to solidify which is visible in the picture. I tried to fix the STEP in Data Doctor. The Geometry Check option (in import DataDoctor tab) doesn't show any bad stuff on and in proximity of my copied surface. Therefore I've no idea why cannot perform the operation. Do you have any suggestions? Of course I'll provide more information about this problem if necessary.Thanks in advance for all replies!&

I am using Creo Parametric - Release 4.0 (connected) 4.0 M130How to configure Creo 4 ModelCHECK to report layers from a list of obsolete layer names as warning, but not delete them (Model_Update must remain NO; user to manually delete per discretion).How to configure Creo 4 ModelCHECK to report layers that are empty and non-rule based.(Don't know what "Connected System" means, so I just picked the first one in the list.)

I am using Creo Parametric 6.0 6.0.5.1I just saved an stl of a part. Now my part has blue lines all over it indicating the tessellation that was created during the stl save. How do I remove these lines and where in Creo Parametric does it indicate that these blue lines are visible? If someone else were to look at this model, how would they know why these lines are present, what they are, and how to remove them? This is a question about the user interface. How is this change in model appearance being communicated to me by Creo Parametric? I see nothing new in the model tree.

We have a Sheetmetal part that exist in a family table where a specific instance in that family table has a Circular reference to SMT_DFT_EDGE_TREA_WIDTH relation. Does anyone know how to break this reference. Windchill is giving me a server warning that is tied to this reference. The reference does not occur in the Generic or any other instance in family table.   

I am using Creo Parametric - Release 3.0 (connected) 3.0 M080WFH license for 45 daysMAC Address : 1C-BF-CE-6A-15-08

I am using Creo Parametric - Release 3.0 (connected) 3.0 M090We want one WFH license for 45 daysMAC Address : 1C-BF-CE-6A-15-08

As the title said, I can't find datum after erase, how to let the datum appear again after erase? this problem bothers me a lot 😭  

I am working on a team, so it's only natural that we would want to make it easier to work as a team. So having some semblance of version control would be great. I've done some searching and I haven't found much of anything yet. Even if GitHub turns out not being possible, would there be any alternatives? Let me know! Thank you and take care. 

I am using Creo Parametric 3.0 M190 Fatal error occurred while moving model, drawing, part and asm.M190 Reinstalled but still experiencing the same symptoms.Here are the errors that I faced The trace creation timestamp is: Wed. 8 18 14:44:57 21The executable build timestamp is: Fri. 1 25 01:59:18 19The datecode is: 2018360The pro machine type is: x86e_win64The process ID is: 9248The traceback type is : CRASHThe logger exit status is: 00003The Trail is: trail.txt.32The release is: 3.0The external datecode is: M190The product title is: Creo Parametric--------------------------------------------

Have a huge drawing that is going to require me to change two established datum planes off surfaces to datum axes. My problem is, this assembly has 30 or so GTOLs that reference the old datum planes, and I'm looking for a way to not have to manually go through each annotation and change the datum reference. Any ideas how to handle this?

I have a very large assembly that takes long time when I am trying to check in. When I do check in from embedded browser the drawing preview will be not be available. Therefore PDF does not published whenever a change task is completed. Is there any way to check in from embedded browser with "Models and Viewable"? Thanks

I am curious why in a large drawing, with a full assembly and all the individual detail parts dimensioned within this drawing, I have to check out individual parts when making minor dimensional changes? I'm not using model dimension nor model annotations, but in order to say add a "2X" to a drawing dimension I have to check out the model itself? Is there a way to keep this separate via config settings? Is this just how Creo works?

Hello,   I'm new to Creo I've been trying to figure our how to rename files when using Creo Distributed Batch 7.0.2.0   The files have part numbers with a "ABC-00-1234" format but the file names for exported PDF's and STEP files come out as "abc-00-1234".   Is there a ToolKit command I can use to:   1.  Make the first 3 letters in the part number capital. 2.  Add "_rev" and the file revision parameter of the end of the file name.   In the end, I want the file names to be displayed as "ABC-00-1234_revA".     Thank you,   Eddie    

I am using Creo Parametric 3.0 M090We are having an issue with a high number of fatal errors on our machines. I was wondering if there is a way to diagnose this?Here are the errors that I faced fatal error