PLM

I am using PTC Pro/Intralink Release 11.1 and Datecode with CPS M020-CPS13While creating a product, getting below error:Type Identifier "WCTYPE|wt.change2.WTChangeReview|wt.change2.PeerReview" cannot be found. See the Windchill Business Administrator's Guide for further information.Here are the errors that I facedType Identifier "WCTYPE|wt.change2.WTChangeReview|wt.change2.PeerReview" cannot be found. See the Windchill Business Administrator's Guide for further information.

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 11.1 and Datecode with CPS M020-CPS12When we are publishing the drawing the frame and boxes are coming in yellow colour in thumbnails

Version: Windchill 12.0 Use Case: What release of WRS is corresponding to PDMLink version ?Description: Is there any corresponding table that explain which version of WRS map which version of PDMLink ?Thanks in advance for any answer.Fred

we are doing windchill rehosting of our dev environment (Windows based). we have filled all the required data in the rehost.properties file but we are stuck at vault section. what does those '0' and '1' means in the attached snap vault_properties.png?we have master vault and a replica as shown in below snap Windchill version 12.0.2.7  Thanks,Sandeep. 

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: Wondering if there's successful implementations of publish worker with File Synchronization for SolidWorks 2023 SP5.0 on virtual Windows Server 2022. Tried with (and some other combination also..) WWGM 12.1.2.1 and Creo View Adapters 10.1.0.0, but publish fails stubbornly with "WWGM ERROR: Loading addin "\x86e_win64\obj\swadapter_loader_net.dll" into SolidWorks failed". Windchill installation would be version 12.1.2.5 I know the above combination is not in the list of PTC tested combinations, but the one we have with SolidWorks 2021 is not either and it's working fine.Description: --

We are currently exploring an integration between Windchill PLM and Assent Compliance. As you may know, PTC has retired Windchill Product Analytics (WPA) beyond 11.1 and partnered with Assent to address evolving regulatory requirements such as REACH, RoHS, SCIP, Conflict Minerals, and IPC-1752B standards.I’d like to check if anyone in the community has:Already implemented or piloted a Windchill–Assent integrationInsights into what capabilities can and should be integrated (e.g., BOM data exchange, supplier declarations, compliance reporting)Lessons learned, challenges, or best practices during such an integrationAny guidance, references, would be highly appreciated!

I am working on a Windchill product structure and need help with Reference Designators in a reuse scenario.Here’s my structure:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Product Structure 1 (Top Level)    |--Parent 1         |--Sub Assembly 1               |--Child 1 with Reference Designator (e.g., R1)    |--Parent 2         |--Sub Assembly 1               |--Child 1 with different Reference Designator (e.g., R2)-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sub Assembly 1 is reused under both Parent 1 and Parent 2.Child 1 is part of Sub Assembly 1.Sub Assembly 1, Parent 1 and Parent 2 are Configurable Modules whereas Child 1 is a WT Part.I want to assign different Reference Designators to Child 1 depending on which parent it is under (R1 for Parent

Dear WC adminstrators, I do have some ambiguity on below scenarios how the content is managed.Is content copied or moved from cahce vaults if Cache vaults and replica vaults are set up in replica site, when any user uploads a file connecting to any replica site?Is content moved or copied when file initially uploads to cache vault and then goes to master vaults incase of master site?How is content accessible by user B connected to main,if user A uploads the file to replica site.how the content is accessed by an user in Replica site B if an user from Replica site A uploads to Replica A site vaults,if a user uploads a file to main, how is this available to userB connected to any replica? 

Version: Windchill 12.0 Use Case: I need to prefix the output of the algorithm="ext.xxxx.xxxx.external.xxxx.impl.ODataNumberAlgorithm To be prefixed by "C", if _rootNumber id "7000000", what syntax do I need to add below for the rootNumber to be "C7000000"Description: I need to prefix the output of the algorithm="ext.xxxx.xxxx.external.xxxx.impl.ODataNumberAlgorithmTo be prefixed by "C", if _rootNumber id "7000000", what syntax do I need to add below for the rootNumber to be "C7000000" <VarDef id="_rootNumber" algorithm="ext.thales.palma.external.kiwi.impl.ODataNumberAlgorithm"><Attr id="rootNumber" /></VarDef>

Version: Windchill 13.0Description: We have customized a PRE_WORKSPACE_CHECKIN listener to process an attachment file and populate attributes on the associated CAD document during the check-in process. It works great, but sometimes users forget to add the attachment, which results in none of the necessary attributes being populated. Is there a way to throw a warning (or error that can then be bypassed) to the user during check-in to tell them they are missing the attachment? Ideally I would like to call this in the custom listener. public void notifyVetoableEvent(Object event) throws Exception{ if(!(event instanceof KeyedEvent)) { return; } //Object target = ((KeyedEvent) event).getEventTarget(); Object type = ((KeyedEvent) event).getEventType(); if(type.equals(EPMWorkspaceManagerEvent.PRE_WORKSPACE_CHECKIN)) { EPMWorkspaceManagerEvent wsEvent = (EPMWorkspaceManagerEvent) event; WTSet workingCopies = ((WTKeyedMap) ((EPMWorkspaceManagerEvent) event).getWIPMap()).wtKeySe

Hi Gents. I have seen this same issue as this topic: Using Major/Minor revisions - PTC Community, - how to interpret and structure "major.minor", as R&D Lead in several organisations. (Defence, Oil & Gas, Consumer Electronics), and have found this thread while trying to understand what windchill implements as standard. My take is this: Lets choose to interpret minor change as No NEGATIVE Impact on "FFF" **at the level of the item in question** AND NO change required to any production documentation, test procedures or impact on requirements.Major change is the converse of this. Rationale. In engineering assemblies, as long as the change we make on our part/assembly still meets the requirement on it with **at least** the same margins, AND impacts nothing else (as above) then it is **fully compatible**. It is a minor revision. The fact it may have improved something, is for the product manager to take advantage of at a higher BOM level when that becomes relevant for sales. Th

Hello,We’re currently looking for a solution to connect our ERP system, Infor Syteline, with Windchill 13.Could you let us know which tool or connector you’ve used for this integration?Thanks in advance!

I have a classification attribute named Colour with internal name COLOR,in the Constraints tab, I have assigned global enumeration which is having internal name Colour(COLOR_ABC). Is there any api available such that when I give an input of Classification Attribute internal name (COLOR), my output should fetch the global enumeration used COLOR_ABC.  @HelesicPetr  

I have created two attributes in Windchill that makes use of enumerated value lists. I have introduced cascading attribute rules against the object type which is associated to the two attributes. My cascading attribute rules stipulate that if a value for attribute 1 is set to X, then the value for attribute 2 should be set to Y. I have configured the "Create New Layout" for this object type to contain these two attributes. When I set the value of attribute 1 to X, attribute 2 does not display a value of Y automatically. Instead, the dropdown list of values associated with attribute 2 decreases to two to select from - a value of Y and an option to set the attribute value to blank. I want attribute 2 to be set to a value of Y without giving the user the ability to select between a value of Y or blank. I am aware that it is possible to specify that attribute 2 should not include any blank options in the dropdown list it is associated with. However, this will not work for me since I d

I need to find a WTPart/WTPartMaster that matches to specific partNumber, partRevision, View and Organization I provide. How can this be achieved by QuerySpec? Or is there any alternative?

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: I am attempting to do an OData call to retrieve parts filtered by a custom attribute on a part. How do I do a GET request with a $filter that allows me to filter a custom attribute?Description:  Attempted URL:https://company.ptcmscloud.com/Windchill/oauth/servlet/odata/ProdMgmt/Parts?$filter=MY_ITEM_NUMBER eq '12345'Error message:  { "error": { "code": null, "message": "The property 'MY_ITEM_NUMBER', used in a query expression, is not defined in type 'PTC.ProdMgmt.Part'." } }  URL's I've tried that do not work:https://company.ptcmscloud.com/Windchill/oauth/servlet/odata/ProdMgmt/Parts?$filter=ProdMgmt.MY_ITEM_NUMBER eq '12345'Error message: { "error": { "code": null, "message": "The URI is malformed." } }  Other URLs:https://company.ptcmscloud.com/Windchill/oauth/servlet/odata/ProdMgmt/Parts?$filter=contains(ProdMgmt.MY_ITEM_NUMBER,  '12345') I tried following the steps here without su

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: Sending GET request to Windchill OData with 'LastModified' filter set to 2025-09-08T12:34:57Z: Windchill/servlet/odata/v8/ChangeMgmt/ChangeTasks?%24filter=LastModified%20eq%202025-09-08T12%3A34%3A57Z&%24orderby=LastModified%20descDescription: As result, I receive all ChangeTasks from 2025-09-08. It seems OData service doesn't check time, only date. Is there any solution to this? Other operators like 'gt' behave the same way.

Hello. Does anybody know if it is possible to achieve the scenario above? I have created a custom "Problem Report Workflow". The OOTB "Problem Report Workflow" contains a synchronize robot that should result in the state change of the problem report being set to "Resolved" when the associated change request is completed. I have replicated this config with my custom problem report workflow but I have adapted the synchronize robot with the aim of it synchronizing when the change notice completes. This is in ciontrast to it synchronizing when a change request completes. I'm not aware of any issues with my new workflow. However, I've noticed that I cannot add problem reports into the "Associated Process Objects" table when creating the change notice. Consequently, I don't think I have a way of my problem reports becoming "Resolved" at the same time as the change notice completing if I cannot add the problem report to the change notice as an "Associated Process Object".

Hi All,   Can someone please tell me how to get the View Rule Conflicts to hyperlink to be enabled on a task so that the user can click on it and see the error and fix the same?   Please find a sample screenshot below   This is required for Windchill 11.0 M030   So kindly let me know if any leads are there.

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.2.15unable to fetch usagelink attribute using element.getValue("quantity.unit") in info-engine task. Using Query-Tree webject.Here are the errors that I facedunable to fetch usagelink attribute using element.getValue("quantity.unit") in info-engine task. Using Query-Tree webject.It's simply returning null value while in info-engine output value is shown.

We encountered this error message when transferring simple text comments to rich text comments. This is alluded to here: https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS297322?source=search where it mentions that comments with special characters will be ignored. I am posting more as documentation rather than a question for the field. I have a customization that takes task comments and copied them to a discussion forum so it must be able to handle anything the user can submit. Looking at my logs, I think it does not like & at least but need to get a complete list.  Caused by: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; lineNumber: 1; columnNumber: 68; The entity name must immediately follow the '&' in the entity reference. method that threw error was  at com.ptc.core.richtext.HTMLText.setFormattedText(HTMLText.java:369) https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS293387?source=search Last one found for context when descriptions were converted.

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: Custom web app not working when upgrading to Windchill 12.1Description: Hello ,We developed custom web app in the same windchill folder , i'ts working on Windchill 11when we migrate to Windchill 12 the Windchill and the custom web app not workingplease note that the custum web app is compiling with the java version 11  , Tapestry 5.3.8 Error :The problem is related to Filter on Web.xml<!-- start configuring Tapestry 5 - LEOparts-portal--><context-param><param-name>tapestry.app-package</param-name><param-value>ext.leoni.portalv3</param-value></context-param><filter><filter-name>portalv3</filter-name><filter-class>org.apache.tapestry5.TapestryFilter</filter-class></filter><filter-mapping><filter-name>portalv3</filter-name><url-pattern>/portalv3/*</url-pattern></filter-mapping><filter-mapping><filter-name>portal

I have a number of updates to do for about 100 parts so want to make use of the import from spreadsheet. The OEM parts, Mfg and vendor parts all exist. What I am looking to do is have each part of 2 MFG parts and those two MFG parts have a vendor part which is basically the same part. Also, in some cases, the AML exists partially meaning that the MFG parts are already linked. We are just adding the additional vendor part relationship.  The sheet validated ok but import failed with "Sourcing entry already exists".  Resorting the sheets ... Sheet 1 "axl-1": Type: Type: Error Row: Description: Description: Sourcing entry already exists (com.ptc.windchill.suma.ixb.SuMaIxbHndRB/SUMA_AXLENTRY_EXIST_CONFLICT) wt.ixb.publicforhandlers.LogHelper$IxbException: Sourcing entry already exists at wt.ixb.publicforhandlers.LogHelper.userError(LogHelper.java:252) at com.ptc.windchill.suma.ixb.SuMaIxbHndHelper.userError(SuMaIxbHndHelper.java:412) at com.ptc.windchill.suma.ixb.handlers.Exp

Can anyone help me know what type of questions asked in Windchill Implementation Practitioner Exam? only MCQs? or it includes the activities/tasks as well?

We use the comments field on New Change Tasks to write lengthy descriptions on each object that will be changed on the ECN. Out of the box, this field is quite small and only displays a partial view of the text that is entered.  This makes it hard to proofread comments and view formatting.                                     Is there anyway to make this text box bigger so that more of the text is visible? We are on Windchill 11.0 M20.   Thanks in advance for any suggestions.