Recently active
I am trying to put together a document when a trigger is run from Integrity. In particular I want to get the text which you can find by viewing the "History" tab of any item from the User viewset. 1) Am I correct in assuming the history cannot be accessed from a standard bean? I have tried the following code to retrieve the history using the API from my script: var apisession = eb.createAPISessionBean(); var command = new Packages.com.mks.api.Command("im", "viewissue"); command.addOption(new Packages.com.mks.api.Option("showHistory")); command.addSelection(10000); var response = apisession.executeCmd(command); But I can't really tell if this is useful, it doesn't seem to contain the history (despite use of "showHistory") when I've looked through the "response" object's keys. 2) Is there another way to do this? Thanks
FATAL log:2016-03-13 14:03:22,041 Unable to create temporary file in directory C:\Windows\system32\config\systemprofile\AppData\Local\Temp\. An exception occurred: The system cannot find the path specified. Ensure that the directory exists and that the Integrity Server has permission to write to it.2016-03-13 14:03:22,182 Service Configuration not started due to errors: Service mks:name=SysConfig not started due to errors: Unable to create temporary file in directory C:\Windows\system32\config\systemprofile\AppData\Local\Temp\. An exception occurred: The system cannot find the path specified. Ensure that the directory exists and that the Integrity Server has permission to write to it.Server log:2016-03-13 14:02:41,198 ERROR [org.apache.catalina.startup.Embedded] Cannot find specified temporary folder at C:\Windows\system32\config\systemprofile\AppData\Local\Temp\2016-03-13 14:02:42,010 INFO [org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol] Initializing Coyote H
How can we Export Integrity Document into PDF directly rather then Exporting to DOC and Converting to PDF ?
Hi everyone, When we execute out test session then we set verdict in respect of every test case and if more then one test case fails then our test session if failed then we again create Test Session for the same Test Objective again but i want to accomplish some scenarios if can be possible or there is any workaround:- 1.) Suppose we have total of 10 Test Case and assume in first Test Session 3 get fail and 7 gets passed then in 2nd test session only those 3 test case comes automatically. 2.) If Test case T1 is related with T2 and T3 then if we select T1 test case then both of related test case also get selected automatically. Any quick response might be helpful. I look forward to hear from you all... Regards, Kapil
On document Level ,document owner is a field capturing current user who will create that document by trigger. And in content level of that document Assigned user is a field can control each content. How to accomplish that document owner can also edit or control all the content (Only assigned user can edit the content as of now but want to give permission to Document owner as well ). By trigger I know how to do , but is there any short method ?
Does anyone suggest me how to capture effort and costing in testing cycle up to project level ? And if you are doing what is your way to achieve the same ? Any quick suggestion and idea would be helpful ? (Not only technical idea any business side idea would also be helpful.)
Dear All,is it possible to import requirements into PTC IM from Word, Excel files for instance?Regards,Alessandro
This document details the various mechanisms that provide "traceability" in Integrity. For the purposes of this document, traceability is defined as the ability to link disparate items/objects/artifacts together to provide increased visibility and easier location of the related items. The exact types of objects linked, as well as the reasons for doing so differ on a case by case basis. The functionality detailed includes both the various types of relationship fields as well as the special functionality described as traces. The document is roughly divided into two sections; definitions and recommendations on how to configure the various relationship mechanisms, followed by how to view or use the various mechanisms.
Can I call the MKS CLI commands automatically by putting them in my build.xml file? I am trying to automate aspects of the build process using the mkstask.jar and mksapi.jar files and would like to be able to configure my build.xml file so that it will automatically connect to the integrity server and make those commands. Is this possible? Upon looking at the CLI reference guide, it seems like they must directly be typed into the command line terminal since the commands are always listed like so:im connect [--hostname=value] [--port=value] [--password=value] [--user=value] [(-?|--usage)] [(-F file|--selectionFile=file)] [(-N|--no)] [(-Y|--yes)] [--[no]batch] [--cwd=directory] [--forceConfirm=[yes|no]] [(-g|--gui)] [--quiet] [--settingsUI=[gui|default]] [--status=[none|gui|default]]however, upon viewing some documentation on the ant task, it seems as though these commands could be put in the build.xml file and automatically invoked like in this example:The MKS Source command "si co --lo
I want to change a content level in excel.SectionText1here is text......2here is text....3here is text....SectionText1here is text......1.1here is text....2here is text....So I'm finding many blogging, it could do at MKS solution (maybe in 2008) (reference : https://change.unigroupinc.com/documentation/pdf/MicrosoftExcelIntegrationGuide.pdf , 23page)But it doesn't work.this is code that I try in excel integration.<field external="Relationship" internal="Contained By" field-type="relationship" direction="both" reldirection="backward"/>and this is error message in excel integration."Could not save modified item 3788: MKS124080: Cannot modify standard field: Contained By"
What is the difference between the IM beans and the SI beans(ex imServerBean vs siServerBean)? What are the situations where you should or should not use them and why?
Retrieving Information from Multiple TracesThis is the relevant mapping file.
I added in my viewset the comment feature but I don't knwo how to use it. I didn't find any information in help but there was another useful feature named bookmark.I wanted to use it as well but I don't understand how to activate it. When I highlight a text and I want to use "properties" in drop-down menu, this feature is greyed.Any recommendations: - to use the comments - to activate the bookmark feature
Currently it is not possible to use the XML language defined include structure:gateway configuration XML could include many different xmls that define the different exporters and importers.Would be nice to have such feature
Has anyone did or cracked Vector Canoe Integration with PTC Integrity as it's not supported yet PTC but still has anyone tried ?
Hi every one, How to creat Shared-Summary field that i cann used in Test Suite Branch, i have now the following Shared Field: Shared Expected results Shared External ID Shared Text Shared Attachments Regards
Hi, I'm an Integrity 10.9 user.I'm searching the solution templates of Integrity,But I couldn't.Someone please tell me the where I can download them.Thank you.
I need a best practice, how to upgrade Implementer2008 to implementer 12.0. Thanks
Hello, is there a way to avoid the computer to automatically restart using the silent uninstall on Integrity 11.1. The restart happens only if the client was installed using silent install. RegardsOumar
Hi,I'm trying to use SOAP to change the order of the items within a relationship field, can anybody help me with the syntax?Regards,Thierry Van Ackertomtom
Does anyone have a slick way to compare two Integrity Workflow and Documents configurations (especially Fields and Types)?
As I created the Traceability Matrix I got a row like this:But actually the "i" has a Full Name with Type as "Ratio of Locking Wheel".I would like to ask if anyone knows how to add the Type of the Properties in the row items.Y. Huang
I'd like to set a default value for new nodes in a document, in my case a table. I've tried prefixing with <!-- MKS HTML --> but all the HTML tags just appear as typed and not rendered. I suspect it's not possible.
I have a concern with inherited part properties in Integrity Modeler using SysML. I'am not able to change the type of an inherited part property (without changing the type in the "parent-element" as well). Any ideas?Here is a simplified example:So far the following blocks and relations have been modeled:Now I wish to redefine the type of the part property "p" of "Child". It should be in the end like this:Comment: I did this before in Cameo Systems modeler. The procedure there was: right click on "p" of "Child""refactor""redefine to..."A list of possible types apeared - in this case [Type of Parent Part; Type of Child Part] - and I would choose "Type of Child Part"
Hi I want install Thing worx 7.4 on Mac facing issue Error "Failed to load FlxCore library" is returned when starting ThingWorx 7.4.Please help..
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.