ALM

Hello,I am using Visual Studio and C# to create a SOAP client for Integrity 10.8  web servicesThe wizard generated a class public partial class Integrity_10_2Service : System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocolI use the code below to get the attached file from an item.                Integrity_10_2Service ws = new Integrity_10_2Service();                ws.Url = "http://server:port/webservices/10/2/Integrity/";                AttachmentRequest arg0 = new AttachmentRequest();                arg0.AttachmentName = "Workflow.png";                arg0.FieldName = "Attachments";      

- From an Integrity document A, copy a content- From an Integrity document B, Paste Special in Shared Mode.- Edit In Word on document B. Modify a content.- Publish the Change.-> Impossible to publish the whole of document -> An error is displayed by Integrity because of the fact that Contents that are in Shared mode are in read only.Do you know a workaround for this case?

Like for Assigned to me I would like to build an historical query to filter issues that at some time in the past has been modified by me.It is not possible to select the Modified by field in an historical field value filter (maybe because it is a calculated built-in field).Any workaround known?

Is there a way to add comment while clearing the suspect? We want to record why the trace relationship has been cleared

The "ALM_Team" item is at the moment not including a definition for the complete team, which causes for many users confusions. They feel excluded from the related project. As an additional benefit this team list could be used, to filter the available users for defining the owner of a change request or task. With the current configuration, when we are defining the "ALM_Team" item type, there is no direct (actual) relationship available with an "ALM_Change Request" while selecting Owners (after selecting the defined team in a CR).  That's, the Owners field values for "ALM_Change Request" is not dependent on the selected team but depends on the constraints groups which are defined in the Type constraints (as shown below):This above selection values for Owners remain constant for any CRs irrespective of the defined team/ new team. Requirement is to introduce/ have another field (user field) called "Team_List" in "ALM_Team" item type, where we can define the actual users involved for

I am using the Integrity API and need to uniquely identify a server. Is there some kind of timestamp I can use? My usecase would be able to tell it's a different server if the timestamp is different.

  An Integrity report can display attachment field values like Attachment File Name or Attachment File Size. Can an Integrity report display the contents of an attachment file like jpeg, html or rtf?  

Many times I found that (specially when working with documents in IMS) that a specific change is applicable to X number of objects, but a query is not yet suitable to filter (because there is no enough information to filter properly) and apply the change.  I wonder if there is a CLI doc for this purpose or scripting or a guide in how can I programm an Add-on? Specific case to illustrate and explain my question: Document A has lot of objects (requirements) that I want to change attribute: "Category". It is not easy to filter so what I do is "multiple selection" of the objects, then right click and "Edit Items", select the category I and the value for the field. This event will change all selected objects to have same Category. I want to repeat this action without going to the "edit items, select field category, select value, click ok" process. I would like to be able to create a "macro" event that for all selected objects, do this action. one click! Thanks for your responses...&nbs

Hi Community,I am  looking for is there a way to associate a  single Change Package with multiple Change Requests in integrity.Thanks,Vinay

Hello,I'm currently using Integrity 10.6. I quite often use the Edit-In-Word feature for the entire document, However when publishing the changes made, it always gets stuck at the items which are "shared". Is there a possibility for the Editor to skip the publishing of an item whenever the reference mode is shared?many thanks in advance for your helpbest regards

Hello everyone:     Integrity report template of Document Matrix displays the traces between two documents,but i have many questions about it as followings:     1. what's the trace field for use to traces?     2. can i customize the trace field for my own report view show it likes as follwoing pictures?does anybody knows the answers, if anybody konws or have good idea to solve this questions, please give me a response.Thans & Best RegardsJason

Hello -In Integrity 10.9, I'm trying to create a new field for my documents that is a computed sum of all "Verified By Trace Count" entries in a document.The field "Verified By Trace Count" related to each requirement is calculated by:     isEmpty(RelCount("Verified By"),0);So, at the document level, I was hoping the sum of all these values would simply be:     sum("Verified By Trace Count");but that always gave me the error:"An error occurred parsing the computation expression "sum("Verfied By Trace Count");": MKS124539: sum: Function is an aggregate function, but a non-aggregate computation is being evaluated."I tried using the aggregate function, but couldn't quite get the syntax right.Any help would be appreciated.Is there a document that gives examples on how to use all these computational functions and operators?Thanks!John

Hello !Can someone help me and show a simple example how to synchronize Simulink with PTC integrity.Regards !

What are the Software components required to install Integrity Lifecycle Manager and Integrate it with Windchill?

We are getting a constraint related error when trying to create a related item through a trigger. The trigger completes correctly but the changes are ultimately rolled back due to a constraint error preventing a certain value (a copied field). The value on the new item has a constraint based on an FVA which points back to the first item through the relationship which was just created. The only explanation I see so far is that the constraint is not correctly reading this FVA's new value. So I just want to ask if anyone can confirm whether constraints act strangely when interacting with FVA's and there's nothing to do about that.

Can some shed some Light on Modifying the XMl Template files to Configure and generate the Excel Reports using the Custom Features of Integrity Report Engine ?

I have used this percentage expression (1.00* count()) / (sum(query("All Untraced Requirements",Project,count()))/count()) in chart, For some cases the value is null and it is as follows:Can someone tell what is the reason behind this strange behavior? Thanks in advance.

Hey communityDoes somebody know how to use a different data type in historicFieldValue?<%compute%>HistoricFieldValue(ASIL,timestamp("Sep 30, 2016 03:00:00 PM"))<%endcompute%>In Integrity the ASIL field can be changed by using a "select list" like in html. An item's "State" is also an select list. But it's possible to incorporate "State" in the historicFieldValue because the different states return integer numbers, respectively. Is it possible to define the same functionality in Integrity for different field names with select lists? Or any further possibility to obtain a result for HistoricFieldValue of different data types? Currently the error message is as follows:I hope you know what i mean in this context and would really appreciate any support Thank you in advanceMartin

  Using documents we currently face some strange changes in be way PTC handles the “Documents” relationship in Segments.  As it seem impossible to find a manual/howto that fully describes how it is supposed to work I wrote down all case we can see currently in our system. Create a new DocumentDocumen create…Enter fields in DialogSet field “Root Document” to TRUE>> field Documents contains the project backing item     Move a ROOT DocumentDocument Change ProjectEnter fields in new ProjectEnsure field “Root Document” is TRUE>> field Documents contains new the project backing item     Branch a ROOT DocumentDocument Branch…Enter fields in new ProjectEnsure field “Root Document” is TRUE>> field Documents contains new the project backing item     Change “Root Document” to falseSet Field “Root Document” to false>> field “Documents” becomes emptyEVEN if the current User has NO project administrator permission &n

I would like to define a background colour in the Integrity LM client for users working on the DEV system of our staging environment.this colour must be controlled by the server - as the the user(s) could also connect to the PROD system > where the colour should be the default colour.the idea is to prevent "test users" from creating productive data on a non-productive system.I m aware of the lower right corner section where the users could see to which system they are connected > but unfortunately they do not realise what they see .... or just ignore it

I noticed that a user query can use the same name as an admin query. Maybe this user query was created before the admin query? The problem is that some trigger operations find a query by name, and they do not always default to grabbing the admin provided query. Can someone outline the interactions between duplicate named queries?

Hi,Does anyone know a fast way to open documents which are linked by a source trace to a requirement item!?Currently it really takes a lot of clicks to do this: open source trace view - select file (again) - locate member - view history - open fileThe first time this took me 62 seconds - which is not really acceptable - but try yourself...Any suggestions?Greetings,Daniel

Hello everyone,     I am looking for a way to prevent the mass modification of mks domain groups.  In the last month, I have had to restore the membership table multiple times because all the users were removed from an access group.  We are setting up a job to duplicate the table locally so at least the restore will not take as long, but this still requires a bounce and that is difficult to schedule.  Any suggestions are appreciated.Thank you,Paul Hartwig

Hi,We haven't upgraded our Integrity Server in a while and need to go from 10.2 to 10.8. Is it possible to upgrade directly to 10.8 or do we need to go from 10.2->10.3->10.4 etc.I only ask because I remember doing one upgrade in the past where I skipped a release and it ended up missing a properties file (encryption.properties) due to a new feature that had been introduced in the previous release but was not created in the later release. Then I had to roll back and perform the intermediate upgrade before going to the next version.Thanks in advance for any info.Best regards,Paul