Dedicated forum for our customers to share, collaborate, discuss best practices.
Recently active
Both in maths and in engineering texts, the complex conjugated of a number or a variable or a function, is indicated with an asterisk. My attempt to create the new operator c.c. Is not satisfactory, as can be seen from the following picture: Can you do something better? Thank you very much! Francesco
Dear all,I'm facing an issue with 2d interpolation in Mathcad.The interpolating function results in negative, not plausible values.Could you please support you?Attached you find the file.Thank-you very much.Enrico
Did PTC decide that Mathcad 11 single user edition is not going to be registered online anymore?I did a reinstall on my computer with a copy I bought new. Mathcad 11 works fine and I am not willing to pay for a new edition.How do I register my copy, or is PTC offering a free upgrade with a supported activation line?
Hello,I don't know what has happened to my program. It was working before but suddenly it can't do the calculation and says "not enough memory for this operation". Can you please check and find the reason? All the bestPayman
Hi,Would anybody mind helping me why I could not have written 3d plot?
This seems odd. I'm using a program to drop values into matrices. It works wonderfully - until I get to a matrix 16 items long. Then I get an error. Here's a rather pointless example. Suffice it to say it happens regardless of how many variables I return, or whether or not I use a matrix inside the program. Tried it a bunch of ways to only get the same result: Exceed 16 rows and get an error. This version works fine: And here's the same thing with one more row (r[i) Thoughts? 4.0 attached. Thanks,
I have a few questions for our resident experts. I am working on a sheet that I'd like to have use multiple solve blocks. The first block feeds results to the second block. While I can do it - I wonder if there isn't a simpler way. It's rather cumbersome to set everything up this way. I'm also curious about how MC works in regards to solving - as it seems sluggish. Is MC solving the same solve block over and over every time I call the functions (e.g. When I solve for L(alpha) and K(alpha) does it solve the 2nd block twice and the first block 4 times)? Here's a picture of a very simplified version. MC4.0 attached. (note: actual sheet is 18 pages with dozens of variables and I'm using multiple blocks because using one block has become unmanagable. It also allows me to use existing calculation templates without merging calculations.) Is there a better way? Thanks,
Hello Community, Can anyone tell me, make the numbers by the black arrows show 0 instead of 10^-37? I've tried changing all the setting for number formats, but it doesn't really help:
Help Please. Thanks.
Hi, I have to calculate the deflection of a shaft with some different loads. (a couple of Forces and line-loads like in the sketch below). The diagram of forces and bending moments i could calculate completely, but when setting up the boundary conditions and the ODE it's running into an error. Boundary conditions should be taken from the function for the bending moment. Although i think i have set up all conditions completely, i can't display/calculate the deflection anyway. I think it's because of the forces which act at particular lengts and their definition in the solve blocks but i have no idea whats wrong. Has somebody an idea? Thank you very much! EDIT: I see more and more problems solving in good old MC15 hoping it lasts running for a long time.
Hello folks, MathCAD Prime 3.0 novice user here with a question. I am trying to duplicate example 51.4 from Lindeburg to determine the pressure resulting from a shrink fit betwen two cylinders. I have attached a .PDF of the problem. I have also attached a coply of my MathCAD Prime 3.0 file which I am struggling with. To me, the problem involves solving a system of equations for "P". I have put the entire problem into a solve block but I am not sure if this is the correct approach. The three regions of the solve bloc "Guess Values", "Contraints", and "Solver" regoins seem to run together. Any advice would be appreciated. Best regards, Bill
Hi everyone! I am coding with Mathcad a worksheet that is supposed to generate the response spectra for earthquake data. I have achieved it using the Implicit Method, but when I use the Explicit Method (Central Difference Method) I get the message that there is a floating point error. Could somene please help me to fix this problem? Thank you
Hello!About a week ago I've received the following problem: You have a ground fixed punch bag (resting on a spring that's attached to a counterweight).What is the minimum sensor setup in order to determine: the force of the punch in the bag acceleration of the punch the speed of the punches (for multiple punches) Notes: no sensor must be attached to the person punching the bag, only on the bag bag is punched in a limited vertical area Justify the answer with: sensors calculations Working as hardware engineer, I must admit I'm not that experienced with physics. I've been trying to figure a way to solve it for a week now. What I thought of is mounting an IMU in the center of the bag and after that gather experimental data by hitting the bag with a pendulum. What's hard for me to determine is the force with which the bag is hit, how much of that force gets absorbed by the padding and the remaining force that drives the bag afterwards. Finding the acceleration and speed o
Good luck with the new forum to begin with (For now it works like the first MC Prime with basic errors, namely certificate errors: needed to add a browser exception). I am still using Mathcad 11. And I am a fun of it. An evident point I miss is to be able to show a result of an equation inline with the equation itself. For instance: x:= 5 y:= 2x= 10. Instead in my worksheets I need always to write y:= 2x and again y= 10. In a worksheet that I opened recently, I found with my surprise the following equation asking from Matrix Mat_A its eigenvectors. And you can see it is followed with the "=" as I wanted. Probably I copied from MC15 to MC11 or I did something else. I do not have recalls on how I did it. Now I am not even able to replicate it inside MC11. Is someone able to explain if MC11 can do that. And if not, how can be explained the "exception" shown? Thanks
Hi, I'm trying to rewrite function "f" in the first line of the picture below in terms of only "x2" and "x3": Find f(x2,x3) Any ideas ? Is it possible ? Thanks in advance. Att, Ricardo S.
Hi. I know that this is a Mathcad forum. But i have a problem and i don't know how i can resolve. You have a TRX system: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbybxX5cXBEand you want to determine the following with a sensor based system:1. the energy spent during workout2. the correctness of the exercisesHow do you physically determine 1 and 2?What sensors do you need?How do you use the sensors?(The sensors must be placed by the TRX system)I thought to use 2 IMU sensors and one load cell sensor. But i don't know how i can determine the correctness of the exercises. Any help would be highly appreciated!
Hello, I have a set of data which I divided into 3 vectors X, Y, and Z. I am trying to generate a best fit equation for this data based on the formula Z = a*X^b*Y^c Is there a function in Mathcad to determine a best-fit equation based on the above formula. This question was posted before, but was lost when the PTC Community forum got migrated into a new platform, so I am trying to get back the answers I obtained. Thanks, Felipe Loo
Hi, I have an expression like: tan (alpha) - alpha = 0.48 where 'alpha' is angle in radians, and want to calculate the Value of Alpha. How to solve this using Mathcad? Pl Help! Regards, Shashank
Hi everyone,I am trying to represent on a 3D plot, spheres placed neatly one with respect to the other, as seen in the following picture. The problem arises when the argument of the plot consists of countless elementary functions. Is there a synthetic way to represent multiple functions so you do not have to write an endless list in the plot argument as shown below? Thank you very much Franc
I decided to try out the new OLE capability of 4.0. The good news is that the process seems to work quite well. No hiccups that I saw. The bad news is the image quality that is displayed is decidely subpar. Here you can see the OLE version on the left, and the cleaner result I got just from pasting directly from visio (i.e. not linked). It still looks poor when printed or pdf'd. So, as it sits, I don't see the OLE as being an option since the quality isn't professional looking. I don't see any options to improve the quality. Any tricks that I'm missing? Thanks,
Why we have https://community.ptc.com/t5/PTC-Mathcad-Questions/bd-p/PTCMathcad not https://community.ptc.com/PTC-Mathcad-Questions for example
\ Video Link : 7777
I want the very first page of my worksheet to provide a summary of calculation results. The result in question is reached at the worksheet, so I need to display variables defined further down. Is there any way to bypass the positioning constraint in Mathcad Prime 4.0? Using global variables is a way to do it, however some variables in the worksheet change several times and therefore need to be local
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.