ALM

Nowaday, I build c# UI and application to answer to designer's needs.In order to keep our application as independant as possible, i would like to run scripts contained into a given model from those application.Do any elements exist to do so?

HelloI would like to create a query to filter all the issues I have been assigned to in the past.I am looking for a PTC Integrity equivalent of JIRA "was".Any idea?Kind regards.Thierry

Hi all,we want to copy some field values from one short text field to another short text field by a trigger. Unfortunately it is actually possible that the string in the source field is longer than the max. length of the destination field. In such a case the user gets an error message, and the transaction will be aborted. I didn't find any function to get the field size in the trigger documentation. Is there any way to get this information available to a trigger script?  Thanks, Jens

We are currently using PVCS and wish to convert to Integrity.Is there a conversion procedure/script between the source code control systems?Thanks,Swapna Das

Is there a way I can get content assist working in Eclipse when scripting triggers?

Hello,I am using Visual Studio and C# to create a SOAP client for Integrity 10.8  web servicesThe wizard generated a class public partial class Integrity_10_2Service : System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocolI use the code below to get the attached file from an item.                Integrity_10_2Service ws = new Integrity_10_2Service();                ws.Url = "http://server:port/webservices/10/2/Integrity/";                AttachmentRequest arg0 = new AttachmentRequest();                arg0.AttachmentName = "Workflow.png";                arg0.FieldName = "Attachments";      

- From an Integrity document A, copy a content- From an Integrity document B, Paste Special in Shared Mode.- Edit In Word on document B. Modify a content.- Publish the Change.-> Impossible to publish the whole of document -> An error is displayed by Integrity because of the fact that Contents that are in Shared mode are in read only.Do you know a workaround for this case?

Like for Assigned to me I would like to build an historical query to filter issues that at some time in the past has been modified by me.It is not possible to select the Modified by field in an historical field value filter (maybe because it is a calculated built-in field).Any workaround known?

Is there a way to add comment while clearing the suspect? We want to record why the trace relationship has been cleared

The "ALM_Team" item is at the moment not including a definition for the complete team, which causes for many users confusions. They feel excluded from the related project. As an additional benefit this team list could be used, to filter the available users for defining the owner of a change request or task. With the current configuration, when we are defining the "ALM_Team" item type, there is no direct (actual) relationship available with an "ALM_Change Request" while selecting Owners (after selecting the defined team in a CR).  That's, the Owners field values for "ALM_Change Request" is not dependent on the selected team but depends on the constraints groups which are defined in the Type constraints (as shown below):This above selection values for Owners remain constant for any CRs irrespective of the defined team/ new team. Requirement is to introduce/ have another field (user field) called "Team_List" in "ALM_Team" item type, where we can define the actual users involved for

I am using the Integrity API and need to uniquely identify a server. Is there some kind of timestamp I can use? My usecase would be able to tell it's a different server if the timestamp is different.

  An Integrity report can display attachment field values like Attachment File Name or Attachment File Size. Can an Integrity report display the contents of an attachment file like jpeg, html or rtf?  

Many times I found that (specially when working with documents in IMS) that a specific change is applicable to X number of objects, but a query is not yet suitable to filter (because there is no enough information to filter properly) and apply the change.  I wonder if there is a CLI doc for this purpose or scripting or a guide in how can I programm an Add-on? Specific case to illustrate and explain my question: Document A has lot of objects (requirements) that I want to change attribute: "Category". It is not easy to filter so what I do is "multiple selection" of the objects, then right click and "Edit Items", select the category I and the value for the field. This event will change all selected objects to have same Category. I want to repeat this action without going to the "edit items, select field category, select value, click ok" process. I would like to be able to create a "macro" event that for all selected objects, do this action. one click! Thanks for your responses...&nbs

Hi Community,I am  looking for is there a way to associate a  single Change Package with multiple Change Requests in integrity.Thanks,Vinay

Hello,I'm currently using Integrity 10.6. I quite often use the Edit-In-Word feature for the entire document, However when publishing the changes made, it always gets stuck at the items which are "shared". Is there a possibility for the Editor to skip the publishing of an item whenever the reference mode is shared?many thanks in advance for your helpbest regards

Hello everyone:     Integrity report template of Document Matrix displays the traces between two documents,but i have many questions about it as followings:     1. what's the trace field for use to traces?     2. can i customize the trace field for my own report view show it likes as follwoing pictures?does anybody knows the answers, if anybody konws or have good idea to solve this questions, please give me a response.Thans & Best RegardsJason

Hello -In Integrity 10.9, I'm trying to create a new field for my documents that is a computed sum of all "Verified By Trace Count" entries in a document.The field "Verified By Trace Count" related to each requirement is calculated by:     isEmpty(RelCount("Verified By"),0);So, at the document level, I was hoping the sum of all these values would simply be:     sum("Verified By Trace Count");but that always gave me the error:"An error occurred parsing the computation expression "sum("Verfied By Trace Count");": MKS124539: sum: Function is an aggregate function, but a non-aggregate computation is being evaluated."I tried using the aggregate function, but couldn't quite get the syntax right.Any help would be appreciated.Is there a document that gives examples on how to use all these computational functions and operators?Thanks!John

Hello !Can someone help me and show a simple example how to synchronize Simulink with PTC integrity.Regards !

What are the Software components required to install Integrity Lifecycle Manager and Integrate it with Windchill?

We are getting a constraint related error when trying to create a related item through a trigger. The trigger completes correctly but the changes are ultimately rolled back due to a constraint error preventing a certain value (a copied field). The value on the new item has a constraint based on an FVA which points back to the first item through the relationship which was just created. The only explanation I see so far is that the constraint is not correctly reading this FVA's new value. So I just want to ask if anyone can confirm whether constraints act strangely when interacting with FVA's and there's nothing to do about that.

Can some shed some Light on Modifying the XMl Template files to Configure and generate the Excel Reports using the Custom Features of Integrity Report Engine ?

I have used this percentage expression (1.00* count()) / (sum(query("All Untraced Requirements",Project,count()))/count()) in chart, For some cases the value is null and it is as follows:Can someone tell what is the reason behind this strange behavior? Thanks in advance.

Hey communityDoes somebody know how to use a different data type in historicFieldValue?<%compute%>HistoricFieldValue(ASIL,timestamp("Sep 30, 2016 03:00:00 PM"))<%endcompute%>In Integrity the ASIL field can be changed by using a "select list" like in html. An item's "State" is also an select list. But it's possible to incorporate "State" in the historicFieldValue because the different states return integer numbers, respectively. Is it possible to define the same functionality in Integrity for different field names with select lists? Or any further possibility to obtain a result for HistoricFieldValue of different data types? Currently the error message is as follows:I hope you know what i mean in this context and would really appreciate any support Thank you in advanceMartin

  Using documents we currently face some strange changes in be way PTC handles the “Documents” relationship in Segments.  As it seem impossible to find a manual/howto that fully describes how it is supposed to work I wrote down all case we can see currently in our system. Create a new DocumentDocumen create…Enter fields in DialogSet field “Root Document” to TRUE>> field Documents contains the project backing item     Move a ROOT DocumentDocument Change ProjectEnter fields in new ProjectEnsure field “Root Document” is TRUE>> field Documents contains new the project backing item     Branch a ROOT DocumentDocument Branch…Enter fields in new ProjectEnsure field “Root Document” is TRUE>> field Documents contains new the project backing item     Change “Root Document” to falseSet Field “Root Document” to false>> field “Documents” becomes emptyEVEN if the current User has NO project administrator permission &n

I would like to define a background colour in the Integrity LM client for users working on the DEV system of our staging environment.this colour must be controlled by the server - as the the user(s) could also connect to the PROD system > where the colour should be the default colour.the idea is to prevent "test users" from creating productive data on a non-productive system.I m aware of the lower right corner section where the users could see to which system they are connected > but unfortunately they do not realise what they see .... or just ignore it