Creo+ and Creo Parametric

Why don't the instances of the assembly show up in the BOM?

Hello, I have a problem when launching an analysis of a rack. The software throws the following error "The model is insufficiently constrained for the analysis. Please review the element connections,properties, and constraints in highlighted entities. If this is a modal analysis, then you may be able to obtain a solution by requesting additional modes."I have been trying to solve this error for a month and it has not been possible, I have already tried to solve it by means of welding contacts and interfaces, applying certain properties in the materials and I cannot solve it, I hope someone can help me, I attach the image with the errors.

How do you create a component interface to Geometry feature that allow for automatic assembly (autoplace) of a component to an assembly based on a named coordinate system. We figured out how to do similar using the Interface to Interface capabilities, however that requires defining an interface in EVERY receiving assembly. We would like to do this WITHOUT adding an interface feature in every assembly.E.g. Align a nut to an assembly purely based off a named coordinate system using query rules defined in the component interface?We are using Creo4, however will be moving to Creo7 soon.

I am using Creo Parametric - Release 5.0 (connected) Release 5.0 and Datecode5.0.6.0it often happens that the program crashes when starting the program or when processing 2D files.

■Q2:How to get these three red isolines from green surfaces?The command under the"Style/curve from surface" only can extract isoline from a single surface, just a partial segment. Even if I extract isolines face by face, the joints of partial segments must be out of alignment 

Hello members, how can I give dimension from Circle boundary to point? Its snapping to circle center point. See attached image. Thanks.

I made a list of the questions that most puzzled me, I would be grateful if anyone could help me with any of the following questions, Thanks############################################■Q1: How to scale each body or surface individually? The "operations/scale model" command will scale the entire part (all body). The "Flexible modeling/Move feature" command only can move and rotate. ############################################■Q2:How to get these three red isolines from green surfaces?The command under the"Style/curve from surface" only can extract isoline from a single surface, just a partial segment. Even if I extract isolines face by face, the joints of partial segments must be out of alignment ############################################■Q3:XZ plane is my sketch plane, How to get the“perpendicular projection point” G of point K ? I can't do that by the snap tool or project tool. (the "S" shape curve is drawn in the ZY sketch plane ) #####################

Dear Sirs,I am using Creo Parametric Release 9.0 and Datecode9.0.0.0I'm getting error "IFX failed to load" followed by "AFX failed to load" when launching Creo Parametric. I found on the online support the article CS332967 and tried to resolve the issue by turning off both extensions with config.pro options, but it did not work.Can you please give me more detailed instructions to turn off these extensions by editing the correct config.pro file? Specifically, which config.pro file should I edit since there are multiple files in the Creo 9 directory?Thank you in advance, best regards.Here are the errors that I facedIFX failed to loadAFX failed to load

■Q7:Under sketch mode, How to turn on the "extension-snap" of LINE_F to make the POINT_K pass through or make it align the extension?  

Hi guys,   I have the problem that many users do only get a blank page at Attributes page when starting a promotion Request. Starting the request in standalone Browser everything is working fine. Even when pressing F5 the screen renews and everything is fine.   config.pro option browser_limit_to_ie9 is set to no Java ist 1.8.0.91   even with original config.pro of installation I got same behaviour...   Windchill: 11.0 M030 CPS03 PS1 Creo Parametric 2.0 M240

■Q1: How to scale each body or surface individually? The "operations/scale model" command will scale the entire part (all body). The "Flexible modeling/Move feature" command only can move and rotate.

■Q6:How to draw a freehand curve fitting the surface of the model?The command under the"Style/curve/COS" only can draw on a single surface, it can not across adjacent surfaces.  

 Multiple display issues under the "perspective mode", Are these some kind of well-intentioned functional design? The visibility of the sketch is completely random depending on the point of view.   I know the only way to avoid these is to turn off the "perspective mode". But what confuses me is why?  Example 1: round corner disappearedExample 2: a simple circle disappearedif there is no center mark or filled color, you can not see the sketch at all, just like the "round corner" example aboveExample 3:In fact, it's much more than that, if you use the "delete segment" tool under the "perspective mode", it will cut the segment When your mouse doesn't actually touch or hover over that line segment. It's like they told you that every building within 1 km of the factory will be demolished, yet your house is 1.5 km away and it's still being demolished

Q5:How to convert the "offset of line_A" into a common or normal curve like an editable freehand curve?  

I have a skeleton model. I include a tank and some 2'x4' to get a sense of how big my structure needs to be.I then use the parts from the skeleton model with the solidify feature in assembly mode to create my 2'x4' parts. I then create some copper bus bars and attach them to the top wooden beam where the cables will mount to. I want the holes in them to be aligned with the center plane of each cable. I made this part by creating part in active assembly, and activating it, and copying the geometry of the cables and the top 2'x4'. I sketched on the face of the 2'x4'. I am constrained to using 2"x8" pieces of copper as my bus bars, so I create the holes in these pieces first to be symmetric. I then activate my wooden 2'x4' at the top, and copy the geometry of these holes. I create an axis. I create a hole of the same size. I get circular references. What bad practice did I do here? I know I could make the holes in the wood piece first, and create the busbar to fit in with these holes

I am using Creo Parametric - Release 8.0 (connected) Release 8.0 and Datecode8.0.2.0One of the engineers in this group is running CFD through Creo Flow, and the systems environment variables (CFD merge quality of 10 and CFD mesh control of 0.1) no not seem to be applied properly to the model.

Q3:XZ plane is my sketch plane, How to get the“perpendicular projection point” G of point K ? I can't do that by the snap tool or project tool. (the "S" shape curve is drawn in the ZY sketch plane )  

I have a reoccuring issue I am sure there is an easy fix for but I cant find it. scenario: I create a family table of parts and create a drawing for the generic version. I then copy the drawing to a different drawing number and replace the model in the drawing using the model replace function in the menu manager. now these parts are slightly different.. may have different number of holes, etc. I do not dimension the model. I create all dimensions in the 2D drawing.when I change the notes or add / delete dimensions on the copied drawing it changes / deletes them on the generic. and vise versa. for example. a hole diameter dimension with a dimension text saying typ. 8 places on the generic drawing. change to typ. 6 places on the copied drawing. go back to the generic and the 8 places has changed to 6.. change it back to 8 and the copied drawing changes....Why are these drawings with different file names dynamically linked to each other? how do you break that link?

Hello,I noticed that when we use the function ''Merge/Inheritance'', we can activate the option ''Toggle Inheritance''. This allows to integrate the copied functions in the model tree of the part and the associativity link between the reference model and the part remains established. In case of changes in the reference model, the part can be updated with a regeneration. Unfortunately, it is only in this way. If the part is modified, the reference model will not be corrected. Are there any improvements planned in this case?Best regards.

Sweveral parts created offile and now trying to upload to GPLM.  Upload failed and error state: get(Title2D) failed: Attribute Title2D not loaded! Any ideas please

Creo 8.0.3 Which is the right way to constrain the belt part?I need two pulleys with at least rotational dof by one.So I make the belt feature and after I can make the part.BUT the part is not constrained. So...wich is the best way to constrain it?I would to let the pulleys rotate so I cant constraint the belt directly to them.In addition I also have a warning to regenerate the model, but I don't know why.

I am working in Creo 6 with an older drawing created in Creo 3.  I have added a flatness callout as can be seen in the attached screenshot labeled "flatness_left".  Creo will not allow me to flip the flatness control frame over to the right side.  When I try to move it to the right, it only gives me a bent leader line as can be seen in the screenshot labeled "flatness_right".  Is there a way to have the flatness frame be on the right with a straight and vertical leader?

Hello,I have a problem with Creo 8.0's "Allow Assumptions" feature.In creo 2.0 when I assembled a component by defining two constraints and the "Allow Assumptions" checked, the component was fully constrained and automatically oriented itself trying to orient the default planes of the component with those of the assembly.The component was always "squared" with respect to the assembly.Now in Creo 8.0 it is still completely constrained but is not oriented "squarely" with the assembly, it remains oriented in the "dynamic" position defined during the assembly phase.In my opinion this is risky, because I could inadvertently get an unwanted orientation.Is there any way to get back the behavior that was in Creo 2.0?From your experience, do you find this modification appreciable? Like?Thanks.

Hello Experts,I was wondering if anyone has run into this issue.  When importing emn/emp files in CREO 3.0 if the "ecadname" in the ecad_hint.map is longer than 31 chars its truncating those name for the session and the resultant is that the mcadname to be used from the library is not brought into session since the ecadname truncation doesnt carry over to the emn/emp files.  This behavior didnt exist in CREO 2.0.  An SPR 5720922 has been filed but I wanted to reach out and see if anyone had this issue and found a suitable workaround.Thanks,Anil

I am using Creo Parametric Release 4.0 and DatecodeM130I have a part with flexibility (adding and suppressing some features). I want to create a drawing of the part with the different flexibility status. How can i do it? How can I represent the different flexibility status on the part (not on an assembly)?Thanks