Manufacturing (CAM)

I am using Creo Parametric Release 4.0 and DatecodeM150HelloI am using the relation RAW_MATERIAL_WEIGHT=PRO_MP_MASS:2 in my manufacturing .asm to show in 2D drawing of my Manufacturing Setup sheet the Weight. The number :2 refers to the ID of my Raw model. But when I save a copy Drawing / .asm and replace the model of raw material the parameter PRO_MP_MASS:2 doesn't update and in my drawing, the parameter keeps with the weight of the previous one. Do you have any suggestions to solve this problem?Here are the errors that I facedHelloI am using the relation RAW_MATERIAL_WEIGHT=PRO_MP_MASS:2 in my manufacturing .asm to show in 2D drawing of my Manufacturing Setup sheet the Weight. The number :2 refers to the ID of my Raw model. But when I save a copy Drawing / .asm and replace the model of raw material the parameter PRO_MP_MASS:2 doesn't update and in my drawing, the parameter keeps with the weight of the previous one. Do you have any suggestions to solve this problem?

CREO Parametric 8.0.5 with  NC Complete. I am working on setup up work center for Okuma mill-turn. Okuma uses common variables instead of work offsets. Has anyone setup a work center like this before or have some useful reference materials/videos for this?  

Hi, how do you define the tool for the lathe.I didn't get it from the instructionsI tried to create a Solid tool and I added CSYS TIP and CREO doesn't want to create paths even though I increased BACK_CLEAR_ANGLE. Could someone send me an example of how you define this?Thanks in advance

Turning by milling   We propose to create Creo Manufacturing functionality that will make it possible to process using the “Turning by milling” method. There is a need, especially in turning and milling, to organize processing using the “Turning by milling” method. This method is very important for our customers. To obtain scallops of optimal height, it is necessary to shift the center of the cutter tool relative to the axis of the workpiece. In other words, we need to ensure a offset of the cutter axis relative to the workpiece axis (Ew).   We tried to do this using the 4X_LEAD_ANGLE angle, but we realized that the Ew offset and the 4X_LEAD_ANGLE angle are different and independent values. That is, it is impossible to obtain a certain offset Ew simply by changing the angle 4X_LEAD_ANGLE, and vice versa. Moreover, the contact point of the “END MILL” tool with values ​​of 4X_LEAD_ANGLE is more than 1 deg. from the center of the tool face, when 4X_LEAD_ANGLE is close to zero,

I am looking post processor for deckel FP4A dialog 11... please help me if someone have ...

My company uses Creo to design large scale glass facades and other highly customized designs for the architectural market. Some of our parts are very special and some are typical steel cross sections.   My company is about to purchase an  OCEAN AVENGER PLUS DRILL LINE.  The AvengerPlus requires a DSTV compliant file which has a .nc or .nc1 file format files.   Does anybody have experience  with converting Creo parts into a DSTV compliant file?   Any help would be great.   Thanks. Steve

I am trying to post out a thread cycle through creo for a Haas lathe. On the cycle line itself it only posts out g76 g98 f20. I've looked through the post processor and changed a few things in the threading cycle area but nothing has changed.Any ideas? Thanks,

Hello experts I have a question about volume rough seq. Is it possible to add some minimum default radius on every motion change tool path endpoint to avoid sudden motion stop and start for a smooth machine run? please check the attachment for detail. regards AsifFisa

Hello,I have a question about manufacturing family parts.I have 2 parts ruled by a family table. Simple parts, one with a M8 threaded hole and the other with a 8.4 countersink hole. This is the only difference between the 2 versions.The 2 versions/functions cannot cohexist in the generic part because the threaded hole and the countersink are both chamfered. The geometry for the chamfer on the threaded hole is destroy by the countersink fonction and vice versa for the chamfer and the countersink. In the generic part ONLY i am forced to desacivate one of the 2 fonctions. No problem with childs parts. Due to this specification is it possible to have one manufacuring assembly with a "selection " version threaded or version 8.4 ? Or am i forced to have 2 manufacuring assembly with both "child" parts ? Thanks in advance

I am experiencing issues with the material removal simulation in creo parametric 10.1, where the play path changes the tools I imported. I imported the following tools: H63TH-SVVBN-H16 with a VBMT160408 and MTJNL2525M16N with TNMG160408L-ES.During the play path simulation with the VBMT insert, it remains and shows the correct path. However, when attempting to use it in the material removal simulation, Creo modifies its geometry, resulting in an error. Additionally, I am unable to utilize the toolholder for generating the collision report.

I imported a lathe tool into Creo parametric 10.1, and whenever I run the simulation, the tool above the workpiece has a distance almost equal to the radius of the insert tip. How can I make the tool execute the simulation correctly?I went through this process by creating parameters, defining the tool size, and still, I am not able to achieve the desired simulation result

I am using Creo Parametric Release 8.0 and Datecode8.0.5.0Hello,I will write Gpost for Siemens 840 D control units, but I didn't get the gpost output as belowCS_TOOL("T60")CS_TP("T11")When I got the gpost output, I got it as belowT2 M6T1How can I change Tool output as CS_TOOL and CS_TP in the GpostCS_TOOL= Tool to useCS_TP=a next tool

I had the following request in today from a customer. How do I delete the references used in an NC step, Using the references right mouse click doesn't allow the option. Customer on Creo 4 F000, I have also tested on 10.0.2.0.Only way seems to be to edit the Tool Motion entries.

I have always struggled with Creo when it comes to getting good millpaths.  No matter what I try, it always seems like Creo defaults to pushing the cutter directly into the middle of the part (material fully surrounding the cutter) instead of slowly milling its way into the part from the outside in.I have dealt with this issue for many years now, and decided it's time to make a post here asking for help.  As you can see in the video, it would be ideal to mill the outside first, allowing 2/3rds of the cutter in the material until it mills completely to the center.(view in My Videos)

Hello,Why GPOST does not output the feed rate during NURBS machining ?Attached a new PP completly empty (Postprocessor defaults) and CL file.CREO 7.0.5.0GPOST V6.8 P20p2-J11 Regards 

Hello, I am using CREO 5 - manufacturing, I am trying set probe in Manual cycle - CL Command - Menu - PROBE_CYCLES.Has anyone work with this?Thank you for the help

Hello,I have a problem with the creo post processor when i call an other coordonate system such as G55.Some context :I have 2 parts on a special clamping pallet with their own origin. G54 and G55.The final sequence is engraving serial number of each part. The problem :The first and the last point of the serial number have the same Y position (Y P1 = Y P2 = -12).The serial number is engraved at the same position on the two parts. By the way insisde their coordinate system Y positions are the same. D1 = D2In G54 Y P1 = Y P2 = -12 and in G55 Y P3 = Y P4 = -12 this is the corresponding code : What happens in real life : At the end of the first block, the cutter rises and keep the last  Y position.G55 is read but because Y position is identical, Y is not recall on line 392. The cutter move to X -59.5 in G55 but stay at the same Y position instead of going to Y -12 in G55. Is there a way to force the post processor to output X and Y in case of changement of fixt

Hello, I am using CREO 7 and currently doing the cam follower mechanism for a cam rod and tappet and was following the tutorial provided PTCU. The tappet is having a flat surface. The mechanism works well for curved follower but not for the flat surface. I gave the necessary parameters that are required to define the mechanism but I am not getting the usual motion that is expected from this mechanism. The tappet sticks to the cam surface and rotates along with the cam rotation, which I don't want (I need the reciprocating motion). What should I do? Are there other parameters need to get the required cam motion?   

Hi GuysHow can I generate G-Code for a 3D printer directly from a Creo model without relying on any third-party applications? Are there built-in tools or features within Creo that facilitate the creation of G-Code for 3D printing? I noticed that Creo has options for 3D printing, but it seems to prompt me to purchase a specific 3D printer.  

Hai,We are into color coding in mould insert manufacturing. currently all inserts have to be coloured manually. Iam checking for option of coloring the inserts automatically in the software itself. Please refer below picture for example for the coloring requirement.The splitting work is done in manufacturing (mould cavity) mode. after splitting the insert is coming as below                   the requirement is at least fitting area color change to either brown or yellow automatically (both can be achieved will be great).kindly let me know how this can be made. Any help will be appreciated. Iam using Creo 7.    

Hello!In Creo NC Complete (5.0.4.0) when I create a new machine code for NC-machine, equations are automatically substituted. CUT_FEED = (CUTTER_DIAM/80)*SPINDLE_SPEED*2SPINDLE_SPEED = 150000/(3.14159*CUTTER_DIAM)STEP_DEPTH = 0.1*CUTTER_DIAMCLEAR_DIST = STEP_DEPTH+5If I set my parameters (for example, SPINDLE_SPEED), they are updated to default anyway.How can I change or remove these equations? Please help me solve this problem   

I am using Creo Parametric Release 5.0 and Datecode5.0.5.0When I select gohome on Creo it ouputs G0 I need this to output G28 command is there a way to change that? I am currently using Option File Generator add on to modify post.

Let's say I brought a model into a manufacturing assembly. And, since I wasn't paying proper attention, it was just brought in as a "regular" assembled part. Now, realizing the error of my ways, I want to reclassify that part not as just a dumb component, but as a reference model. This would seem to be simple enough, There's an actual "Classify" button. But, every time I've ever tried that button, the message is always "This component cannot be reclassified". So, a simple question, what use is the Classify functionality? It never does anything for me. Is there some esoteric situation where it is actually useful? I can't just redo assembly of the model, because I've got a lot of toolpaths that already use it.    

dear expert how can use tilting work plane g68.2 p0 in creo 5 axis? regards Asif  

(view in My Videos)