Windchill

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 13.0 and Datecode with CPS 13.0.0.2 自定义菜单，点击菜单弹出搜索弹窗，根据编号和名称搜索对象，确定退出弹窗后返回选择的对象。类似于windchill中的搜索受影响对象的弹窗，是否有可以直接调用的搜索弹窗。

I need to make Source attribute read only based on view of part. If the part is design view, then in structure tab Source attribute must be read only. But currently it editable as you seen below screen shot. is there any way to write data utility or something that will make Source attribute read only for Design parts.

I am using Windchill ProjectLink Release 11.0 and Datecode with CPS M030-CPS18 The estimated start time of the plan and activity under the project was reset to 8:00 AM on the day the project was created, and the estimated start time of the activity was set three months after the project was created, but it was still reset. The estimated start time and actual start time of the plan and activities under the project are all refreshed to 8:00 a.m. on the day the project is created; There is no error message in the background.

Hi Everyone,When I try to integrate Altium with Windchill Workgroup Manager (WGM), I get the following error:"PTC_WLD_ROOT environment variable is invalid."Has anyone encountered this issue before or can guide me on how to resolve it?Also, I’m currently exploring XPLM integration. If anyone has an SOP or setup documentation, please share it.Thanks in advance!Regards,AJ

Hi everyone,I am looking to optimize our Change Request workflow. During the step where Change Administrators assign members to the Change Review Board (CRB) role, I want them to be able to search for and assign an entire Group rather than individual users.Once the workflow task is routed, it needs to go to all members of that group, but only one member of the group should need to complete it for the activity to move forward.Example Scenario: Role: Change Review Board Group A (Members: Person 1, Person 2, Person 3) Group B (Members: Person 4, Person 5, Person 6) Desired Behavior: Any one person from Group A (1, 2, or 3) can complete the task for Group A, and any one person from Group B (4, 5, or 6) can complete it for Group B. Is this setup doable out-of-the-box in Windchill? If so, what is the best way to configure the role resolution, routing, or tracking to achieve this "one user per group" completion requirement?Any guidance or documentation pointers would be greatly app

In the Part Structure tab, an user can select the Viewing panel --> Show --> Configurable Links, to show all of the configurable links (Revision, Describe, Reference, Master) of the Parts in the Structure.This will improve user experience, will make it for users much easier to get insight and overview of all configurable links in a structure. Currently it is only possible to see configurable links of a Part by selecting (every) Part in the Structure and go to (configured) ‘configurable link’ table on the right side of the Structure.Cause Parts are continuously updated and because it is not possible to get insight, an overview on Part structure level on configurable links it is hard/cumbersome/error-prone to monitor/update the configurable links at the moment.   

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 13.0 and Datecode with CPS 13.0.0.0 We need to modify our data model regarding a specific soft attribute on wt.part.WTPart. Currently, we have a soft attribute with internal name Code defined on the WTPart. However, it is configured using External Attribute Mapping pointing to the Master: masterReference^wt.part.WTPartMaster~Code. Because the attribute is mapped to the Master, it behaves as a mutable global value. When a user modifies this attribute, it updates across all historical iterations and baselines. This breaks our baseline integrity because we cannot retrieve or freeze the historical state of PreferenceCode at the time the baseline was captured. We want to convert PreferenceCode into a standard, unmapped soft attribute (IBA) residing directly on WTPart (iteration level), so that each iteration freezes its own value and standard Windchill Baselines can capture it out-of-the-box. To avoid breaking a massive amount of existing customization,

Hello,Is it possible to import an ArchiMate XMI or XML file into Windchill Modeler? If yes. How to do that. Please let us know. Regards,Balamurali-------------

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.1 and Datecode with CPS 12.1.2.18 Referencing to case: CS98538 I need a similar function in NX like for Catia or Creo to use Design Context functionallity. I know, that this is not supported for NX, but i need a way to load filterd CAD Data to NX. Filter used mostly from a Spatial Query. I would be fine when there is a workaround. And maybe you can provide the info when Design Context is available for NX as well Here are the errors that I faced Does not work for NX

We are starting to create configurable products and would like to handle the whole chain from EBOM to MBOM to Process Plan in Windchill before sending the MBOM and Process Plan to our ERP.Is here anyone who has implemented some form of automation for creating Process Plans for configurable products? It seems that you can filter the Process Plan with a Variant Specification, but for some reason I cannot use the same VarSpec that was used in generating the EBOM and MBOM variants. I need to create a new Variant Specification inside the Process Plan Structure browser to get some different type of Variant Specification that can be used to filter the Process Plan. Here are the different Variant Specification types as described in the Windchill Help Center:The top most type is created when you configure a configurable product and the second one is created when you create a new Variant Specification from Process Plan Structure browser.Also just filtering the Process Plan is not enoug

I have a custom FormProcessor that creates a new WTPart and returns a success banner message. The processor correctly generates the WTPart and its URL, but the banner message displays the URL as <a href="..."> instead of rendering it as a hyperlink.I have tried:Manually constructing the URL and passing it into FeedbackMessage. Passing the generated WTPart inside an ObjectBean and calling super.getSuccessFeedbackMessage(objList).Neither approach results in the OOTB hyperlink behavior seen when creating objects through standard Windchill forms. Also attached partial code. Is there any recommended way to return the created object so that the banner automatically hyperlinks it (similar to standard object creation)?Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks. 

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.1 and Datecode with CPS 12.1.1.2 Users are unable to create a Product when selecting a specific Product Template. During the creation process, Windchill returns an error and the Product is not created. Please find the Method Server error attached. We have already verified the following: Users belong to the Product Creators group. Permissions required to create Products have been reviewed and appear to be correctly configured. Other Product Templates can be used successfully. The issue seems to be related only to this specific Product Template. Additionally, the Method Server error references a user account that no longer exists in Windchill and belongs to a former employee. The user that has permission to create a Product is A. The B, is the user that doesnt belong to company anymore Here are the errors that I faced 2026-07-02 16:21:00,083 ERROR [ajp-nio-127.0.0.1-8010-exec-146] wt.access.evaluation.report falves - "A" does not have Read perm

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 13.0 and Datecode with CPS 13.0.0.0 As i know , PTC introduced a new way to implement custom action model Instead of copying the entire model definition, we can use "incremental" tags to inherit model configuration. But my question is , if we want to remove the OOTB action then how we can do ? Example : Currently suppose i have a "ABC" OOTB model present and i have copied entire model to custom-actionModel.xml file and i have removed few action which will not required then as custom-actionModel.xml override the OOTB model only those action visible which i have kept in custom-actionModel.xml file However with "incremental" option i don't see such thing currently available Here are the errors that I faced General question and clarification

Hello to all;I am looking for a way to display products on the Product Details page that are not classified as End Items, but are just as important as End Items.These products do not need to appear in the End Item section. Instead, they could be displayed in a separate field, such as a "Favorite Product" or a similar custom field.My goal is to have products with Part Type = End Item = No visible in a dedicated area on the Product Details page, making them easy to identify and access.   

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 11.1 and Datecode with CPS M020-CPS25 My Pretest server is not working .

Is there any configuration required to enable POSASSY/Positioning Assembly publishing in worker?

I want to understand the behavior of the following APIPublisherAction publisherAction = new PublisherAction();publisherAction.addAction(PublisherAction.POSASSY, true);publisherAction.addAction(PublisherAction.PROCESSTYPE, "");What is the difference when PublisherAction.POSASSY is set to true versus false? What is its purpose, and how does it affect the publishing process?Also, what is the purpose of PublisherAction.PROCESSTYPE? What values can be passed to this parameter, and how do those values influence the publishing behavior?

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.2.7 Windchill 錯誤 請連絡您的管理員以尋求協助。 隨後會附上其參考資訊。 請求 Id: 165h27ik;mr9feu93;21348;6lxy9d;11095 請求 URI: /Windchill/ptc1/searchResultsComp 查詢字串: fireSearch=true 狀況代碼: 501 訊息: 您的工作階段資料已過期。請重覆您的動作 目前時間: 2026-07-07 09:32:38.436 +0800

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.2.25 电子仓库下某些文件夹生成大量的.unreferenced文件，占用很大空间，这部分未引用文件从何而来？如何排查

how to get secondary classification node with its corresponding attribute and value of each part for qml report. help is there any table joins and configuration in qml will get my requirement or need java code if you have java code pls. give me 

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 11.1 and Datecode with CPS M020-CPS20 I am connected to the server but I can't activate a workspace

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.2.20 The syncing issue of CAD data with WT part. While using build level option it is throwing an error Build failed: The following parts were not built, because the related CAD Documents are unverified or not regenerated in CAD Tool. Even after regenrating the parts are not build with CAD Data.

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.2.18 Hello, We would like to request guidance regarding operating system upgrade compatibility for our Windchill environment. Current Environment: - Windchill Version: 12.0.2.18 - Components: - Windchill PDMLink 12.0.2.18 - Info*Engine 12.0.2.18 - REST Services 2.7.1 - Creo View Adapters 8.0 - Current OS: Windows Server 2016 Planned Change: We are planning an in-place OS upgrade of the Windchill servers, with target versions: - Windows Server 2019 - Windows Server 2022 Questions: 1. Is Windchill 12.0.2.18 supported on: - Windows Server 2019 - Windows Server 2022 2. Is there a preferred or recommended OS version for this Windchill release? 3. Will the OS upgrade have any impact on Windchill components, services, or integrations, and are there any specific actions required after the upgrade? Additional Context: We plan to validate the upgrade in a DEV environment first, followed by PROD during a w

Did PTC change how licensing works for multiple Creo workers on same machine?  We previously had  1 PROE_FoundationVis license for multiple workers set up on our visualization machine for many years as directed both here: https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS29308 and here: https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS473636 but when our contract was renewed, it seems PTC removed the  DUP_GROUP = "UHD"  directive from the PROE_FoundationVis license (as well as our Creo Advanced and Creo Advanced Professional licenses), and now each worker seems to pull a license.  That directive allows “Same user on same host and same display consumes one license even with multiple xtop processes” -- Found out the hard way when our extra workers went to start up and I got 1200 emails informing me that my CAD worker failed to start.  Anyone know if this was intentional on the part of PTC?  I have a case open - and I tried reaching out to License Management but got disconnected after being on hold for 20