Take the Windchill Satisfaction Survey!
Recently active
Subject to: Minimum lies in a range [0;2*π] Write it for MathCad15 please.Thank you
WEBINAR May 29: 11 AM Technical Illustrations for Service: How Tech Pubs and Tech Illustrators Bridge Complexities in Communication Please register today! Details Get to Market Faster by equipping technical publication development and delivery with advanced 2D and 3D Illustration tools Products changes happen often – this impacts manufacturing, services and engineering. Supercharge your teams by taking down siloes and communicating information quickly and simply. In today’s evolving workforce, digital tools play an essential role in connecting Engineering, Technical Authoring and delivery teams, and frontline workers who need to quickly understand service information and work instructions. They need to visualize complex engineering data.Join PTC experts as they explore the changing needs of the service team and the increasing need for speed and accuracy in training tools, service information and work instructions. Join Deb Williams, Senior Sale
I need to create a mapkey to create the name of 2D drawing based on the 3D part but adding some extra strings on it for example,If the 3D part name is V132000430010, then when I call the mapkey it will create a 2D drawing named DV1320004300100-000 that means I need to add D< Genereted name >0-000. CREO Version: 8.0.8.0
HiAs I could read here Ext-Packs I can remember the very useful Extentions packs for Mathcad version 15 but are these also for Prime 10.0 or Prime 6.0 available? And are these Ext Packs the same for Prime?THanks
Hello, I have some performance issues with Creo working with Windchill:When I open an assembly 3D model with Windchill, sometimes it takes a very long time (about 15 minutes), but other times it is quite fast.So, I checked the trail file to find out what happened when Creo opened slowly.The trail file shows:(the codes are changed verytime)After Creo loads "jc120301000a98," it tries to load some items from my local disk, taking 15 minutes.My questions are: What are these local items?Why does Creo try to load them from my local file system (the directory is where my "config.pro" is located)?Why does it sometimes take a long time and other times load very fast? Is there a method to avoid the long loading times?When I try to open this assembly 3D model in a local folder, Creo also tries to load these items.And here is the structure tree:
The result for the steady-state temperature (modeling it numerous different ways) is consistently T=364 K. But the result according to Power=s*e*A*T^4 should be T=314.63 K when I use:A=Area=1m^2 (modeled as a solid or as a surface sphere using shell elements)e=emissivity=1.0Power=power generated within Sphere= 1000W The assumption is this is a sphere in space that does NOT have any solar flux adding heat to it.Why is the answer so different from theoretical? I'm needing to use thermal radiation for the first time for some space equipment and am wondering whether there is a way to do things that will yield correct results for radiation. Thanks. I am using Creo 11.0
Have something weird going on, only applies to a certain assembly.Its linked to the group i think.Any of the sub assembly items within that group, i cant change its view status (Ctrl +h / Hide button)I can hide the group as a whole, just not the individual items inside that group. When i try to do that the "hide/view" icon changes (the strike through on the eye appears/disappears) but the actual items are still visible.i can also hide parts inside those sub assemblies individually.I can also use other groups inside this assembly as normal, only on the one group.I cant see anything different within layer tree either. Creo Parametric 10-0-1-0
Hi - in the attached Prime 9 worksheet my last line (solving for the only unknown, L subscript 4) hangs. The variable L subscript 4 is the only unknown in the equation. Is there a better way to solve for it than what I'm doing here? thanks,russ
HiUsing Creo Parametric 10.0.1.0Wanting to know if theres a way to rename dimensions and show them in the sketch view.So far have tried 2 methods, which do not show in the sketch view itself.the first being the "dimesion text" that also shows in a drawing, the second being the dimension name (then toggling the "switch dimensions under model or tools tabs) As an example, this dimension "160 wide" is also labelled as wide, inside sketcher it shows as only 160 or "sd4" (the original name before renamed)
how can I fix this:if (a )is less than zero the answer should alwyas be zero
In vibration theory there is a problem to define position and velocity of a rod which loaded with distributed bending force q(x). If to assume that this force acts by sine law the vibration equation will be written as follows: Where v(t,x) – function of vertical position of the rod points, E – elasticity modulus, J – second area moment, m – mass per unit length, ω – circular frequency of acting force.Note that J and E assumed to constant.If to substitute now v(t,x)=y(x)·sin(ω·t) one can obtain an ordinary differential equation which describes a form of oscillation:Solve this equation assuming:q=10 kgf/mm;Titanium alloy E=100 GPa;Second area moment J=1440 mm4. Which is equal to rectangle with sides 10 mm and 12 mm, and force acts along longer side;Circular freq. ω=0.1 1/s;Length l=100 mm;Rigid constraint on left bound y(0)=0, y’(0)=0;Bending force on the left bound ;Bending moment on the left bound ;
Apart from the counter-intuitive behaviour of the match() function (and I suppose this holds also for the lookup functions) as shown here: Due to the definition of z and A, none of the results should change when the value of TOL is changed. However: It seems like the value of TOL does 'influence the precision of the comparison' but in an unclear, unpredictable way. I would suggest that ONLY the 'fuzzy' descriptor/modifier "near" uses the value of TOL. Then "eq" should be implemented as 'equals exactly' and likewise for "leq", "lt", "gt", "geq" and "not". Then with "range" the comparison should be to the borders set by z exactly, after specifying whether or not the border values are in range or not. Then the description of "near" should not use the word, 'closest', because "near" is supposed to use the implicit range from (1-TOL)*z to (1+TOL)*z, where some values may be found closer to z than others. I suggest to add an option "nearest" to find the value(s) in A that is/are truely 'cl
Hi All, Has anyone had any success with the Modecheck DRW_TABLE_CELLS? I have an issue where I need to use tables in my default format so that parameters in there will update correctly in the drawing, But this leaves them open to "tinkering" by the end user. I'm trying to use this check to identify the metadata table then verify some of the key cell values in there have not been overwritten (i.e. &PTC_WM_LIFECYCLE_STATE hasn't been replaced with "RELEASED", OR THE :d AND :mdl getting mixed up has been an issue) So far I've been able to get errors on every table that does not conform to the conditions, rather than the 1st value being an identifier, Thanks in advance for any thoughts or past experience shared 🙂 Dave.
Hello,I need to install Mathcad on a machine, I managed to find a program for installation, there is a doubt, do I need a specific license for it?
I recently downloaded a conveyor belt from the “Traceparts” website and constructed a frame for it. My problem is that I need the conveyor belt 3 times, just in different lengths. Is there a way to change the length of the conveyor belt without having to re-download it and have to build frame on it again? I would be very grateful if you help me. 🙂 (Creo version used: 7.0.3)----------------------------------------------------------Translated the text from German to English using google translate.Subject - Größe eines Bauteils ändern in Creo ParametricBody - Hallo zusammen!🤗Ich habe mir vor kurzen von der Website "Traceparts" ein Förderband heruntergeladen und ein Gestell dazu konstruiert. Mein Problem ist, dass ich das Förderband 3 mal brauche, nur in anderen längen. Gibt es einen Weg die Länge des Förderbandes zu ändern, ohne, dass ich es neu herunterladen muss und dass Gestell erneut darauf bauen muss? Ich wäre sehr dankbar wenn ihr mir helft. 🙂 (Verwendete
Hello, When I publish to pdf file after the translation package, I get the following error message. WARNING: [A50920] DITA topic "x-wc://file=0000015385.xml" could not be found for "contentref" at line 6 in "Main Map".I can also just publish the title. I can't publish contentrefI need to help about this case.Thank you
I am writing to you to request clarification on an issue related to the definition and evaluation of variables in Mathcad. I am using PTC Mathcad Express Prime version 10.0.0.0. In the PTC documentation, it is mentioned that "Mathcad only recognizes variable definitions that are above or to the left of the variable evaluation. Otherwise, an error is returned." However, in my practice, I have observed the opposite: Mathcad recognizes the variable definition that is below and to the right of the variable evaluation, and if it does not, an error occurs. Additionally, I am experiencing a problem with unit labeling. When I try to label "a" as a drive, the label does not change when I select a new one from the list of labels. I thank you in advance for your attention to these concerns and I look forward to your response. Eduardo Huesca Hernandez Translated by the Community Moderation using Google Translate Me dirijo a ustedes
We only have 1 license for Simulation Live. It only gets used sporadically among various users. Most people need access to it. When creo starts the license is not pulled but if anyone clicks on the Live Simulation tab, usually accidently, the license gets pulled and prevents others from being able to use it. I dont necessarily want to remove the tab from everyone's ribbon and have them load it manually when needed but that seems like my only option to prevent the license to be inadvertently used. Are there any other options out there? Seems like a pretty annoying flaw in the license design.
Hi,I have a model that I am working on and need to replace an instance with a different instance of the same part. When I go to my model tree and navigate to the instance, right click, and I don't see the "replace" option here. First time I've seen this issue, any tips? Some more information - Using Creo 8 with Windchill 12 Thanks
hello everyone, I am encountering a problem in Creo Parametric, during the creation of a sketch or an extrude. When I want to modify a distance, I double-click on the value, and a fraction of a second later it reverts to the original value. If you have already encountered this problem, I would appreciate your help. Thank you in advance.
Hi!I'm trying to run Mathcad Prime 9.0 through API. I downloaded the C# example solution and trying to open the application by pressing the button "Start Mathcad Prime". https://support.ptc.com/help/mathcad/r9.0/en/index.html#page/PTC_Mathcad_Help/API/example-2_ms_dev_studio.html# However, I get the following error: Problem to connect Mathcad Prime: Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID {A00E8B95-D415-433F-A04E-D298A54A7BB7} failed due to the following error: 80040154 Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG)). I've been googling and using AI for few hours now to fix the problem, but nothing seems to solve the issue. Is there anyone here that could help? Thank you so much!
Version Creo 9 Good Morning. I received this as a step file which opens as a assembly. I am making one of the horizontal pieces about 17" longer. Because it is an assembly with no constraints already built in, I have to move and constrain all pieces next to the 17" lengthened pipe. Is there a way to just save this as a multibody part and make the change so that everything moves together?I have tried file and save as to see if I could just output it as a part but that doesn't seem like an option. I am used to Solidworks where everything is easier. Thanks in advance
How to remove collapsible area line while generating PDF in MATHCAD Prime
I am designing a piece and the shaft of it needs a 1.5 degree angle on in while keeping one side straight and I've done what I know but I was wondering if there was a different way I could actually use the angle instead of what I've got in the pictures. Or if there's any easier way to do this I would appreciate any help I can get thanks. I am on Creo Version 9.0.1.0
I've looked through some other topics, and it seems like there is currently no way to hide keywords and modifiers, is this correct? These types of calculations must always look cluttered?Also, when using explicit,ALL with any non-exact result, you always seem to get a full display of precision. Using Round(x,x) seems to work okay, but this only adds to the clutter of an already "explicit,ALL" cluttered calculation. Using float,x is not much better, if not worse. It seems like the only way to make a clean looking calculation is to double down calculations within areas that can be hidden. But these is a problem with this also... sigh...Not sure why the order of the values is backwards when you remove the "explicit,ALL" part. It doesn't seem to matter how you write the equation, 16in comes first, then 4ft. This would have been a decent workaround, if not for the annoying order in which the substitution is displayed. Can this be fixed? I honestly
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.