Dedicated forum for our customers to share, collaborate, discuss best practices.
Recently active
Hi,Why is not possible to plot like below?
By Chris RussellThis worksheet will:Calculate the bearing capacity factors and the maximum load of a pier Apply to Mechanical Engineering Perform using shear strength, vertical stress, density, bearing capacity, Merrit Handbook, maximum load, etc. This worksheet using PTC Mathcad shows you how to calculate the bearing capacity factor for a specific pier, and then uses this calculation to find the maximum load of the pier. To begin, the worksheet defines all of the properties for the footings of the pier, the un-drained shear strength, the effective vertical stress, and the density of the soil the pier is on, with reference to the Merrit Handbook. Next, the constants to solve for the bearing capacity factors are defined and then the calculation itself is solved. Once the solution is found, it is used to calculate the maximum load of the pier. All calculations, formulas, data, and solutions are provided for you in this worksheet to aid you in your own calculations.Downl
Hi,What does rows and cols? See below the example at which I am referring: And beside the fact that:
Hi, I have a table of data as given below. I want a function or equation of the data. So that I can find the y value for desired x value.Please guide me how to do that in Mathcad. I'm using Mathcad Prime 9.0 xy6.22159.115313111159718822267246227553050334636423939433547335130
Hi,Why when I added a constant value a to a derivative I see that the laplace transform of a derivative did not work as expected? Am I doing wrong something? Or?Prime 9 sheet attached..
When I ran the conversion tool it converted mathcad15 statementto Prime 9 Statement which only works if a precede it with an additional variable definition where NPS1 is already defined.Any ideas why this additional variable statement is required for Prime9 but not Mathcad15?
Hi, How to make this expm function to work also for scalars:
Hello, Sorry to post on a subject that others have before, but I am getting wrapped around an axle and could not understand the prior posts. How do I turn my alpha variable into a scalar or matrix? I've tried to highlight the number and units then select 'matrix', but that did not work. I would greatly appreciate some direction. My Prime 8 file is attached and a screenshot is below: V/r,Devin
Can anyone provide solution for above problem?
Does anyone have a method for calculating the speed of sound in wet steam?The standard method works for dry or superheated steam, but breaks down rapidly at and below saturation temperature.The 2015 paper by Šafařík, November, Jícha and Hackman "On the speed of sound in steam" shows a discontinuity in the speed vs dryness curves at about 0.98 dryness, but I do not know if that is supported by measurement.
Hello everyone, I hope somebody can assist me with this. I am working on a calculation for a planet gear with 4 sun wheels and 1 planet wheel. The aim is to determine the forces on the sun wheel. Initially, I have 3 equations and 4 unknowns. By making an assumption based on symmetry, I now have 4 equations. Unfortunately, I am not getting the correct results. Does anyone know where I can find more information on this or perhaps have a tip? Is my assumption correct regarding the average forces over the teeth? Thank you in advance.
Hi,How to find a function that fits to below data. This function is a resistance temperature dependent that will be further involved into another equation (Vout(Temp)), and then how to plot Vout(Temp) vs Temp? Temp is temperature, lets say from -60degC to 90degC. Mathcad Prime 9 fille attached.
I have searched the community and only find wrapping long equation and not symbolic answers. This works, but I was wondering if there was some built-in way to wrap symbolic answers similar to wrapping long equations, which I don't recall ever doing. "No" is an acceptable answer.😄 Thanks as always.
Hi, Matlab result:
Background:Although unimportant to my question, I am trying to resurrect a Filon Method of Fourier Transforms that I used over 30 years ago in a Fortran code (see my profile😕). I am in the first steps, which require that I develop a polynomial fit to the function to be transformed. Another function will not work in this method.My quandaries:Attached is a Mathcad 15 code for the first steps of this process. You will also need the subroutine called; it is attached also. I searched the PTC Community and found this reference:https://community.ptc.com/t5/Mathcad/The-best-way-to-extract-polynomial-coefficients-and-form-an/m-p/345426#M135001It states that the coefficients of the polynomial fit are the result of the regress(x,y,order) function. However, that cannot be correct as I show in my worksheet. Is this the difference between Mathcad 15 and Prime? My Prime version is very old and and I not very experienced with it.If that is not the case, how do
I spent five hours trying to solve this problem, however could not figure it out, can you please help the sheet is attached
I have six tests and I have done the calculation for one test I need to do the same calculation for the remaining five tests and I don't want to copy paste the calculation, I want to use the same sheet for all the tests with enabling all the functions and calculation to change according to the input values ( general calculation). For example, I want to use the same program for all the CPTSCan you help with that 🙂 The sheets are attached
Dear allcan you help me to construct the tendon profile (Parabolic and Circle)?Thank in advance
Hi, I have converted a calculation sheet from MathCAD 15 to MathCAD Prime 8. However, the macros embedded excel file is not working. I was prompted the message "macros is disabled". I have chosen the enables macros function in excel, but it is not working. I have to save the excel file separately to update the calculation but this will not reflect in the MathCAD, Please help.
Refer to this post earlier today by me.https://community.ptc.com/t5/Mathcad/Need-a-little-help-with-polynomial-regression-fitting-in-Mathcad/td-p/940392In the attached code, I cannot get these symbolic evaluation to work. They just keep running and never evaluate. Any suggestions
When I post, I do not get an email notification when someone replies. Here is my setting. Is there something else I need to set/unset?Thanks
Hi,
I converted a file from MathCad 15 to MathCad Prime 9. After the converting was made, MathCad Prime 9 is marking some of the variables with red Box saying that this variable is not defined (See screeshot). I noticed that the Problem is that Variable contains two level of subsripts and Mathcad Prime 9 cant see the second subscript. As a result all Variables will be seen as only one variable and not multiple diffrent variables. Can someone help me please? Thank you Greetings
Hi, 1. How can I search for each frequency range?For example I looked into the excel file and I saw that 1kHz begin from line 61536 and is ended at line 62560: ... Therefore I extracted manually the respective range in Mathcad: So, for example I want to know between what range the 0.001Hz begging and ends, but without staying and looking into excel file, some automatic routine if can be made in Mathcad: And then I want to know the maximum value for Vout and Vin at the respective Frequency and at which time these maximum values are occuring: Above its only the maximum value at 1kHz, but I do not know at what time these maximum values for Vout and Vin are occuring. Because I want to know then the difference between t2-t1.
In old Mathcad versions, the program performed calculation step by step, during the visualization of the page. Thus if you changed the value of a variable that was involved in a lot of formulas in the sheet, this action did not lead to a lot of calcs that you didn't need in that moment but only to the ones that you were interested in.Prime versions, perform all the calcs where the variable is involved, even those you are not visualizing and therefore are useless for you in that moment.This behaviour is strongly disappointing for long spreadsheets, where old Mathcad versions are much more satisfying.I wonder why this this behaviour has been changed moving from Mathcad to Prime. In any case Mathcad Prime, after ten years of developing is very far form the performance ad usability of the old Mathcad
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.