Windchill Customization

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: Open a Windchill folder and click 【Export List to CSV】.The exportTable.jsp wizard opens with a wizardStep Add a custom validator before the standard export processing:return UIValidationResult.newInstance(var1, UIValidationStatus.DENIED, UIValidationFeedbackMsg.newInstance( "Error message", FeedbackType.ERROR)); The validation message displays correctly in the wizardStep popup.Click OK on the message dialog.Expected Result: After acknowledging the validation message, the wizardStep popup should close safely without JavaScript errors.Description: When adding a custom validator to Windchill’s standard “Export List to CSV” action,the validation message displays correctly in the wizardStep popup.However, after clicking OK in the message dialog,the wizard does not close properly. The browser console logs the following JavaScript errorwindchill-all.js:1556 Uncaught TypeError: top.finishServerSideExport is not a function at PTC.exportTable.exportTa

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: Custom action on the right click menu of Part Structure Page.Description: Created a custom action on right-click menu of PSB, after selecting multiple parts available under PSB and clicking the action I want VR oid of all the parts selected but getting OR oid in the form processor.

Version: Windchill 13.1 Use Case: I want Suggestion box under create layout of subtype of part Description: Actually while i am going to create subtype of Part Suggestion box is not coming simple Textbox is coming Suggestable class is not triggering . 

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 13.0 and Datecode with CPS 13.0.2.0Unable to create As Stored BOM in Windchill (Using EPM MemberLink Relaiton - InfoEngine API)Here are the errors that I facedLatest Revision of the child EPM Document shows up even when the specific revision is passed at the child level in the BOM.

Version: Windchill 13.0   Use Case: Using the + sign on multi-valued attributes with enumeration or pick list is an awful UX design. Has anyone built a data utility or interface JSP to populate using drop down checklist or a multi-select check list (like the type manager has). Description: when selecting multiple values for an attribute, there is a + (plus) sign to add another row to pick more values.   All other interfaces in the world (including type selection in the search ) us pull-down checkboxes, or pick list    has anyone already built the customization to do this that can be easily plugged in.  (Hopefully would be universal to handle any attribute)

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: We are trying to use this Default Trace code in Edit Layout instead of Edit Common Attribute layout to make some Automation. and we are using listern to catch the value which check in, as this is not possible to Edit common attrbute alyout as object will not get checkout and chekcin. so i want to remove that Attribute from Edit Common attribute layout. any one know how to remove from Edit Common attribute Layout ?Description: We are trying to use this Default Trace code in Edit Layout instead of Edit Common Attribute layout to make some Automation. and we are using listern to catch the value which check in, as this is not possible to Edit common attrbute alyout as object will not get checkout and chekcin.so i want to remove that Attribute from Edit Common attribute layout. any one know how to remove from Edit Common attribute Layout ?

I have created a data utility on an attribute which opens a jsp when clicked. Now in this jsp i've created a wizard and added a wizard step. In the wizard step I have 2 table builders, so when i click on the Ok button i want to get the selected objects. But I'm unable to call a form processor on this wizard.

Version: Windchill 11.2 Use Case: I want to remove the content link association between a WTPart and EPMDocument via API , basically my requirement is to remove all the association of cad for perticular part and break the link not deleted the object in actual but remove it from a perticular part and break the link and till now I've successfully been able to remove owner link but I'm not able to find any related API to remove the content link so if you know anything about it please let me know.Description: I want to remove the content link association between a WTPart and EPMDocument via API , basically my requirement is to remove all the association of cad for perticular part and break the link not deleted the object in actual but remove it from a perticular part and break the link and till now I've successfully been able to remove owner link but I'm not able to find any related API to remove the content link so if you know anything about it please let me know.

Hi @TDT    Reference topic: custom Picker Callback not working - PTC Community   Can you please show me the exact way and location to register custom js In my case I have created custom js and registered at this location Windchill\codebase\netmarkets\jsp\custom\contextPickerJSP.jsp   <%@ include file="/netmarkets/jsp/util/begin.jspf"%><%@ taglib uri="http://www.ptc.com/windchill/taglib/core" prefix="wc"%> <script type="text/javascript"src="<%=request.getContextPath()%>/netmarkets/javascript/custom/contextPickerHelper.js"></script><%@include file="/netmarkets/jsp/util/end.jspf"%>  

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.1 and Datecode with CPS 12.1.2.8The IDs of a new BusinessRule and BusinessRuleLink are different in the Database than in the LoadFile.Does the ID in the LoadFile matter, or can it be any given ID? If not, how to maintain an overview over the loaded BusinessRules?An export from the Database would be convenient, but the IDs aren't matching with the LoadFile. So I'm not sure what is correct.

I have an attribute, so that attribute value wanted to map in Project Network as a new Network.

Hi, I want to create a Filter on the Pop-up Window Actions. Based on the action Name, I want to enable or disable the Action. What is the Java Api? I found WTContainerReference for the Product Details.  Url : colorStructure/zfColorStructureWizardPopup?context=tcomp%24infoPage%24VR%3Awt.part.WTPart%3A1173627%24VR%3Awt.part.WTPart%3A1173627%21*&componentType=INFO&cacheBuster=17727800&ContainerOid=OR%3Awt.pdmlink.PDMLinkProduct%3A133401&oid=VR%3Awt.part.WTPart%3A1173627&u8=1&unique_page_number=58185912925159_7& AjaxEnabled=component&actionName=zfColorStructureWizard&portlet=poppedup&context=tcomp%24infoPage%24VR%3Awt.part.WTPart%3A1173627%24VR%3Awt.part.WTPart%3A1173627!*&oid=VR%3Awt.part.WTPart%3A1173627 Thanks!Kanchana. 

Version: Windchill 13.1 Use Case: Trigger an IE Task from Thingworx, where the IE Task executes a Report requiring an input parameterDescription: Hi AllI have an IE task that executes a Report when triggered from Thingworx. I have a Report that returns all the Latest Released Version of a WTDocument, if I dont specify the WTDoc number, it will return all the versions of all available WTDocuments. For the case without specifying the WTDoc number, I am able to trigger it from PTC IE Domain in WRS using the below Request body{"Params": [{"Value": "Doc List","Name": "reportName"}],"Task": "com/ptc/windchill/enterprise/report/DocReport.xml"}Here, Task = IE Task LocationValue = Report Name Similarly, how do I execute by specifying the Document number? I tried the below but it won't work.{"Params": [{"Value": "Doc List,"Name": "reportName"},{"Value": "D000001364","Name": "Number"}],"Task": "com/ptc/windchill/enterprise/report/DocReport.xml"} Many thanks in advance for help

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 13.0 and Datecode with CPS 13.0.2.6I have several Workflows where I use system print statements for debugging purposes. Here is an example: System.out.println("+++++++"); In Windchill 12 this statement appears in the Background logs, not 13. Is there a switch to turn logging on in 13?The history is "System.out.println" commands would be recorded in the Windchill logs for every version before Windchill 13.0. I do not see the logging anywhere for this output. Perhaps there is a switch in 13.0 that we are not aware of to direct system printing to the logs instead of some bit bucket.

 Description: Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: Fetch all unique WTDocuments of allowed types, modified on or after a given timestamp, across multiple document types, without duplicates.Description: I am using below queryspec however it is not returning the results expected, for example when I do teh search in Windchill advance search it fetched results around 300 but using queryspec it is fetching around 60. I am not sure why this discrepency is happening but please help me if you knwo something here. we can have multiple document type. Also internal name is correct. I have cross checked as well. just fetching few results not entire is confusing me.  List<Long> typeIds = new ArrayList<>(); System.out.println("getWTDocumentByLastModifiedDate allowedDocumentTypes>>> "+allowedDocumentTypes); QuerySpec qs = new QuerySpec(WTDocument.class); for (String typeId : allowedDocumentTypes) { System.out.println("getWTDocumentByLastModifiedDate

Version: Windchill 12.0 Use Case: My team is trying to fetch Shared on Date ( Date on which part or documents was shared to the project). Is there a way we can do that.Description: My team is trying to fetch Shared on Date ( Date on which part or documents was shared to the project). Is there a way we can do that. Typically that is available on the project status table for part & docs but is there a way we can get that on the folder tables in projects. 

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 11.2 and Datecode with CPS 11.2.1.8"com.infoengine.exception.fatal.IEInternalServiceException; nested exception is: java.net.SocketException: Connection timed out (Read failed)" when the client attempts com.infoengine.SAK.Task.invoke() of webject task.Specifically, the Remote Importer attempts to process a “revise” command against a Windchill Drawing EPMDocument.The connection times out at the beginning of processing when trying to query the Drawing EPMDocument

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 13.0 and Datecode with CPS 13.0.2.8Resolve issue with custom Javascript function invocation for an action integrated in Creo embedded browser (Custom check-in wizard Toolbar/MenuItem action)Here are the errors that I facedNew custom action in Creo browser for custom check-in page not working

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 13.1 and Datecode with CPS 13.1.2.0Unable to see the Custom Tabs on IKEA Part - Post Upgrade Windchill 13.1.2 from Windchill 12.1Here are the errors that I facedCustom Tabs showing ????

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 13.0 and Datecode with CPS 13.0.2.6I cannot boot the "InfoEngine Task Editor" up via the shortcut in my Windows start menu.Here are the errors that I facedI am produced with the following error when trying to open the shortcut - "Windows cannot find 'com.infoengine.modeler.UI.IEModeler'.

Version: Windchill 13.1.2 Use Case: Windchill installationDescription: Hi, hopefully a quick answer to this one. I can't find the version of Amazon Corretto JDK I should install as pre-requisite to Windchill v13.1.2 on RHEL 8.10. What version of corretto should it be? Where can I find that referenced in the PTC documentation?

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: The link below explains that it is possible to create add "Affected Objects" to a change task within a change notice when creating the change notice using a REST API call. https://support.ptc.com/help/windchill_rest_services/r2.5/en/?_gl=1*ylfb42*_ga*MjAzNzQyOTYzMC4xNjc4MTcyNTE4*_ga_1QBT6P6HR1*MTY3ODE3OTA5Ni4yLjEuMTY3ODE3OTA5OS4wLjAuMA..#page/windchill_rest_services/example_changemgmt_create_changenotice_mul_tasks.html#Description: I have been able to use this script to successfully create a change notice which features a change task with an affected object included on it. I have developed this script further in an attempt to also add "Resulting Objects" (see below). When I add this script into the request body, the interface reports no issues and it seems as though the call runs successfully. When I navigate to the "Changes" section of Windchill, I can see that the change notice was created along with the change task and affected object. However,

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: The link below explains how to make custom attributes available in the criteria of an advanced search. However, I have noticed that I have custom attributes available that I can add to the criteria of an advanced search without following the process detailed in the article. https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/cs180432?_gl=1*cmfofr*_gcl_au*MjAyMjY0MTgwMi4xNzcwNzE2ODM5*_ga*NjYzNjgzODU1LjE3NzA3MTY1MDQ.*_ga_7NMP2MSYPM*czE3NzE0NDE4NjIkbzQwJGcwJHQxNzcxNDQxODcxJGo1MSRsMCRoMA..Description: Can anybody shed light on the circumstances that would require me following the process in the article?

Version: Windchill 12.0 Use Case: We have a usecase where there are some child parts in a Product structure. These child parts are having the same classification node and likely the same classification attributes., but these are different part numbers for a business reason. The requirement is that it must be possible to select these parts with same classification , inside a PSB, and bulk edit the classification attributes. These parts are easy to find in the PSB as we use autonaming.Description: I have a custom wizard which has some other steps, and one of the steps is the bulk edit of classification attributes for chosen parts in PSB (having same Class nodes assigned).How to show the edit classification step in my custom wizard (as a wizard step)? 

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case:1. My client makes use of "Part" objects.2. They have a need to represent instances of these "Parts" as instances in parent objects.3. For example, my customer makes use of "Parent Part 1" and "Parent Part 2". "Child Part 1" is used in both parent parts.4. My customer has a requirement to make use of objects in Windchill to represent the different instances of the child part referenced by the two parent parts.5. These instances should be uniquely identified by serial numbers.6. It is important that the objects being used to represent the child part instances represent the form of the child part at a certain revision.7. It is not acceptable for the objects being used to represent the child part instances to simply represent the part master and not a specific revision of the part. It was previously suggested to me that making use of "Part Configurations" and "Part Instance" objects in Windchill is often not the best way to approach management of