ALM

How to Export Rich Text like Tables, Images in Excel Export?   With the help of customize Excel Export, I am able to export my data from Integrity to MS-Excel but the issue I am Facing is not able to Export Rich Text.   Can anyone who worked in customize parser could help me?

Need the ability to extract Change Package Status for Implementer type so that  I can test the status of the Item's change package to see if it is allowed to be change to the next state. I need to be able to test each and every Change Package ID to test the status if it's value is not "In Prod" then prevent the state from being change to the next state. See the screen shot of the change package tab in this case the rule would prevent the issues state being changed to the next level.   Change Packages tab view  

Hi all,   we've made an update from 10.7 to 11.0 in the last week, and now users are complaining about the readability of charts. Charts configured to be displayed as bar graphs now include a white line which seems to show a pseudo-3D-look (as the bars should be shown as nice cylinders or such thing). But if you have many bars in a chart, and on top this chart is displayed in a dashbord, the charts a quite difficult to read, because one third of each bar is simply white, no matter which color you chose for the bar.      Who the **** came up with this idea without making it configurable? Or is there anywhere an option to have flat bars without blinking shiny reflections? And if you change anything in the old client, why not changing some really important things?   Thanks, Jens

IM Dynamic Group functionality basically defines and affects the IM Project and access control definition to all Items created within that project. How about listing all the dynamic groups at Project creation/update wizard itself so that correspending Project Adminstrator can update the information & memebership of relevant project at same place.   I feel this way we can also define the Project permission (Project access scope) based on the dynamic group membership. Currently, Project Permission (tab) allows only STATIC GROUP which I feel is not ideal. Sometimes, you really want to expose Project & Project data to only to specific bunch of users and not entire static group members.   Pl comment with your suggestions/opinions on this.   You can follow the same idea I had posted on PTC Community in below link: https://community.ptc.com/t5/Integrity-Ideas/Inclusion-of-IM-Dynamic-Group-functionality-into-IM-Project/idi-p/491439/jump-to/first-unread-message &nbsp

Hi all,   just came back from Stuttgart from the PTC Forum and wondered how others perceived this event regarding Integrity. For me it was very interesting (to say not shocking) to see how small the event became and how little there was to see about Integrity.   It was already very clear in the last few years that IOT and PLM had the main focus, but this time there was nothing left to Integrity. Could it be believed that integrity may no longer be so important? Of course, direct conversations always try to refute this impression, but I am sceptical...   kind regards, Jens

Hi all, Integrity 11.1 Configuration Management. Is there a way to find the list of all the CM projects where a member is contained ? I need to search for file name (e.g. Frontload.sql) and get the list of all the CM projects where the member is contained. Many thanks Martina

Hello everyone, I meet some difficulties with limited access to project and documents. In our configuration we define 3 groups with specifics rights : - Creator for editing and assigned user of document. - Reviewer for Review Pending phase. - Signatory for Signature phase. In each group, there are many users. Now, I want to create a project visible by only few users. So the logic is different, I don't care of group, I want to allow access to documents of this project to only few users. But Integrity allows me to limited access only with available groups. So if I want to give access to User A with Creator role, I shall give access to the whole Creator group. So all users of Creator group have access...   How I can use Integrity with real societal concern, confidentiality of project, etc... That's very important for the future of implementation tool in the society. Without this functionnality that's will be very problematic Eudes

In Workflow & Documents, Is there a way to restricting Editability / Relevance of Standard Fields like Shared Category.   The requirement is to allow the setting of Category value only in draft state. Once it moves from Draft state, no one should be able to change the category value.   The Editability & Relevance tab is not visible for standard fields as well on the 'Override of Fields' on the Type. I tried playing with constraints too but it did not helped.   One way I can think of is calling a trigger to abort when someone changes category value. But I want to avoid customization. Appreciate any help.

How to customize Import Gateway parser? Currently when we import a word document in Integrity, all data import in text field. Is there any way to change this pattern, extract data from ms-word and import in some other field other than text?

Hi,   after renaming a subproject via the "Move Subprojects Wizard" a sandbox creation of the renamed subproject with the current project configuration is not possible   Example: 1) Moving  /Testing/Testing2/project.pj to /Testing/Testinng2/project.pj   2) Create sandbox via GUI and the Create Sanbox Wizard after selecting the renamed subproject in the project view     Preselected Projectname: /Testing/Testinng2/project.pj Current configuration: Mainline   we get the Error:  MKS125211: The project file /Testing/Testing2/project.pj is not registered with the current server.   However: With changing the project configuration to Normal (mainline) the sanbox creation is possible. Sandbox creation with CLI (si createsandbox --project=/Testing/Testinng2/project.pj D:\Test) is also possible.   Question: Is this a Bug in the Sandbox Creation Wizard?   Integrity LifeCycle Manager 11.1.0.961   Thanks in advance

Hello,The is.properties file contains a section called "Integrity help redirection"I am wondering if this can be used for a custom Help website that is customized to our Integrity Solution, and how.

Hello, I like to create a message box from a rule-based event. Trying to use command "window.alert" I always get error 'not defined'. Using lookupbean I fail cause I find a message only for package siEnvironmentBean, which does work for IM.   Does anyone have an idea that works? My script example: function abort(s){    eb.abortScript(s, true);}var eb = bsf.lookupBean("siEnvironmentBean");main(){abort("Attention!  \You copied Content.  \Please check whether copied content is still correct!");};   Happy for all hints, Klaus

For example in older Integrity version the command below worked correct  but failed in Intergrity version 11.1 because of missing local project .pj.   Projectpath=/Projects/Library/LibPart1/project.pj Sandboxpath=C:\Library\LibPart1   working path cmd-line C:\Library\LibPart1   si viewproject --hostname=... --port=... --nolock --batch --yes -S c:\Library\LibPart1\project.pj c:\Library\LibPart1\*.*   if Sandbox location is the same as project location it worked, otherwise not.   For new versions since 11.1 worked only on sam pathes this si viewproject --hostname=... --port=... --nolock --batch --yes c:\Library\LibPart1\*.*   error Message: Checking out...*** MKS125408: c:\..*.* is not a valid member name.   Can anyone show me a solution how i can checkout the files in the sandboxfolder in version 11.1?   I hope to get help here   Thank you   ingo

We are soon to set up Integrity lifecycle manager with our PDMLink 11.0 system, and what curious how others and configured their systems. Standalone server,processing power, memory, disk space requirements are main interests. We are also still using RequirementsLink and not sure how we are going to convert/integrate. Any help is most appreciated. Also, which of the releases are reasonably stable. Should we go to the latest(11.2 I believe). Thanks again!

Hi...We would like to allow our users to delete items while applying the governance that we've coded within the tool. The "delete item" ACL provides access to users for deleting items, but it is not granular enough to apply the contextual rules that we need applied.Is there a way to hook a trigger/script up to the delete-item processing? We are looking for functionality that is similar to edit-item and scripts where we can setup a trigger and within a script add the custom-logic that we need. In our case, if the governance rules do not allow for a deletion, the script would simply abort with a message describing why the delete is not allowed.Please let me know how we can accomplish this functionality.Kind regards,-Seanedits: corrections for grammar and typos.

I have a computed date field (date only, not timestamp) that uses the function firstTimeEntryDate() to find the earliest time entry on an item.The output looks like this: Jan 13, 2014 GMT+00:00I want to get rid of the useless "GMT" information.My first instinct is to try to parse the date and reformat it, so I end up with something that looks like this:timestamp( concat( Substring( MonthOfYearName( firstTimeEntryDate() ) , 1 , 3 ) , Text( " " ) , ToText( getDay( firstTimeEntryDate() ) ) , Text( ", " ) , ToText( getYear( firstTimeEntryDate() ) ) ))This doesn't work because "The Timestamp() function takes a single argument which must be a string in the format java.text.SimpleDateFormat".I know I can do the parsing into a text field, but I want a date.Does anybody have a solution to format a computed date field, or more specifically remove the GMT information?

Hi, Or Integrity (+ Modeler) license server runs on a specific VLAN (different from the one which Integrity server runs on). There is a firewall between those 2 VLANs.   My problem is I don't have any influence on the ports used by the license daemons (MKS and ARTSANSW), which makes the settings of the firewall pretty difficult.   Has anybody found an acceptable solution for this issue?   Thanks.

Hello guys, I have defined automatic e-mail with two hyperlinks : Web and GUI. These e-mails purpose is to display document view, the content of the document. - For Web link I have this solution : http://hostname:port/integrity/?view=document&id=152 - For GUI link, I have no solution ! I have only this link redirecting on Document Properties : integrity://hostname:port/im/viewissue?selection=152. The User shall open manually the document in View Document. How to display the content of the document in GUI application? That will reduce actions number of the user.   Does anyone knows why is this issue? I really appreciate any help on this Best regards, Eudes

Hello, I've just got the Integrity Modeler license for my company. Problem is I don't know where to get the vendor daemon to install in our FlexLM server. The vendor daemon is ARTSANSW.   Any idea where I can get it?   Thanks.

Can anyone help me through JAVA API i have couple of task what we can acheive from JAVA API's ?

Hello Community,   I want to know if there is any chance to solve the simple problem to map one parameter on another one.So in this example that it will set automatically the "Rohrdurchmesser" to the "Bohrungsdurchmesser".And is there any way to use the constraint blocks for simple equations or do I have to use Simulink for this problem? Regards,Tabea

Hello, How to create a Report that is not Admin Provided (Is Admin Provide = FALSE) in Integrity Administration?   I’m trying to create a Report in Integrity from “Integrity Administration” but the option “Is Admin Provided” is allways disabled and is set as TRUE. This is important to us because we use Staging Server and we need to create AD HOC Reports on Production server for punctual explorations. When creating a Report from “Integrity Administration” we have 2 options but in none the option “Is Admin Provided” is enabled or <> TRUE (attached file How to create a Report that is not Admin Provided.pdf).   Thanks for your help, Walmir Catunda  

Is there a way to export an item's content to Microsoft Word using Gateway? The Item is not part of Document Model,i.e, the item is not a node or a segment Is there a way to easily export an item's content to create a PDF?    

The process of merging changes from a development path to the mainline is somewhat complicated, and dependant on if you utilize the Change Package functionality of Source, as well as what views and menu options you have set Visible in your Integrity Client. To aid in understanding the merge process, this blog goes over the specific steps you'd need to follow. This process requires knowledge of Change Packages.Let's get started!Step 1 – create a sandbox against the mainlineTo merge your changes from a Development Path to the main line you need to first create a sandbox against the target location (the mainline). To do this:1. Navigate to Project > View Projects2. Select the desired project from the Projects View > Sandbox > Create Sandbox3. The Sandbox Creation Wizard will ask you to specify a location for your Sandbox – select the desired location on your local disk, or create a new folder > Next4. The Project Name will already be populated as we selected it in step 2 – cli

Hi PTC Community,   we are currently hustling while trying to adapt our gateway template. Any help regarding to the problem written in the caption is highly appreciated. At the moment we could only achieve to export the ID of a upward traced item – but not any other field value of this item of another hierarchy level. The code <%{Validates}key=item field value (for instance “Assigned User”"%> or <%{Validates:item field value%> did not work.   All the best and regards Daniel Remmers   Bausch & Lomb Technolas