CAD

I am using Creo Parametric Release 11.0 and Datecode11.0.4.0问题：装配图里第一次插入零件无拖动箭头，第二次才有。重启后第一次就有拖动箭头，这是什么原因，有什么办法去避免？Email: 442787729@qq.comName: Deng Gong

Hi,I am using Creo Parametric 12. Can anyone share an idea, how I can do a helical pattern of this small hole over this round surface?

I am using Creo Parametric Release 10.0 and Datecode10.0.1.0Guidance on the workflow to Create a protrusion that stays normal to a complex internal surface.

I'm trying to simplify a model and I'm not sure how far to go or how much it is worth my time.  I'd like to know if there is a way to analyze how my simplification of a part or assembly affects the graphical performance.  For example if I take out the inner surface of all the tubes is that better than simply focusing on removing the holes.If there was a way to create an analysis that tells me you model has ___ number of faces that might go a long way with knowing how my different simplification methods are improving model performance.That or if there was a way to do an analysis that say your model is using ___ GPU memory.Does anyone from the community know how to do such an analysis?   

I am using Creo Parametric Release 11.0 and Datecode11.0.5.0We are unable to open either the VW AG add-on or the Audi add-on (version: 15000100). The standard Creo version (version 11.05.0) is functioning correctly. The two supplier add-ons cannot be started. The Creo version was successfully checked and approved during the add-on installation.This is a Java error. A higher and compatible Java version (Amazon Coretto) is installed.Here are the errors that I faced"Wrong Java Runtime Environment!The defined command "C:Volkswagen\Volkswagen\VWAG_CreoParametric_15000100\app\vw_tools\vw_tools\1.6.2.0\java\x86e_win64\jdk\bin\java.exe" shows version denied.Required ist Java Platform Standard Edition 17 x64 version 17.0.15 or higher. OpenJDK Amazon Corretto 17 x 64 can be used as well."

Team, Please see this file. I believe Mathcad gives the wrong answer for the indefinite integral of ((-1)^x)dx. Let me know what you think. Regards,Glen

In Creo Mechanism (MDO) motion simulation,I would like to use different spring constants for the loading and unloading (return) directions, in order to represent spring hysteresis.Is there any way to simulate this behavior in MDO?If not directly supported, what is the recommended workaround?

Hello Everyone.From :         To : 1. How to plot a point in 3-D and :        2. Rotation of that point a angle t (say, = Pi/2) about X-axis ?Thanks in advance for your time and help.Regards.

This is a clarified follow-up to a previously solved question. The new objective is to compute the soil wedge area, weight, and centroid (CGx, CGy) behind a retaining wall using the mathematical approach described in the attached Mathcad files, and input data is already explained in the attachment. I am using Mathcad Prime 11. Any help would be appreciated. 

Hola -Longtime Creo/WF/ProE user (2000i2). Having an issue with fit tolerances using the tables. I've configured both the part and drawing to use the tables. Problem example:I have a 20mm shaft for a bearing; recommended shaft fit is h6. For a 20mm dia, h6 is:+0-13. In inches, that is + 0, -0.0005". So the drawing should show 0.7874/0.7869 if I show limits. I set the diameter to nominal, 0.7874. I apply an h6 tolerance.If is specify plus/minus, the dimension appears at 0.7874 + 0.0000 / -0.0005 (perfect!)If I show 'limits', it changes to the nominal 0.7871 and then applies the -.0005 to that, so 0.7866. This is wrong. What am I doing wrong?  TIA

I am using Creo Parametric Release 9.0 and Datecode9.0.9.0With CREO 4.0 we developed a script for sustitution of failed components in assembly. With CREO 9.0 this script returns the following message in std.out:"Attempted use of deprecated config option 'regen_failure_handling' was blocked." even if in config.pro the option regen_failure_handling no_resolve_mode doesn't returns error in the configuration interface.In document CS260154 I've read that an authorization code is needed to make the VBA script working.For the future we are working on a different solution, but at present we are in need of help. Can you help us?Thank you.Here are the errors that I facedAttempted use of deprecated config option 'regen_failure_handling' was blocked

I got a new pc with windows 11 home and with an intel core i7 ultra. I installed mathcad prime 10.0.0.0 with the license from my university in denmark. When trying to export or save the document it crashes. I have tried contacting my university IT-support but they say they cant help because they dont work with the program. I have read on forums that updating to the version 10.0.1.0 solves the crashing problem. Unfortunately my university does not supply license to that version. What can i do?

I am using Mathcad Prime Release 11.0 and Datecode11.0.0.0I did not receive any product code after purchasing 3 licenses.Here are the errors that I facedMissing product code

Hi everyone,I’m trying to determine whether Mathcad Prime can symbolically or numerically solve:• a single 3rd-order (cubic) polynomial, • a simple system of four linear equations with four unknowns.Are there built-in functions or recommended workflows for this in Mathcad Prime,  Any examples or best practices would be appreciated.Thanks!

My old laptop is being replaced and with a newer version.Earlier - few years ago - it was possible to re-activate my Mathcad 14 license on the replacement laptop at that time.Now activation online seems not be possible.I have Mathcad 14 files and older versions files which I revisit once in a while.How to migrate my license from the old to the new laptop ?

I am using Creo Parametric Release 11.0 and Datecode11.0.5.0问题：我在1月15日有尝试过渲染功能，发现是可以使用的，然后今天再次想用渲染功能的时候发现又用不了了

Hi Community, 🙂I am new in this forum.I have medium experience in Creo Parametric (version 8 ) and have made a lot of 3D and 2D drawings.I will soon get version 12. The reason I am writing in here is that I have just begun my path into advanced surface modelling and that is a steep learning curve. I have attached a render picture of what I am trying to create (made by a friend in Rhino), pictures of my sketches I have made, and pictures of my best result with and without surface analysis.What I am trying to do is to make a surface between the different sketches but no matter what I do, it is either failing, or the surface quality is bad using analysis.  I have used several techniques, and I have also tried to use the Style feature. What I Hope is that you can help to me learn how to do this geometry with a good quality surface. I know I am missing some features, steps or adjustments in order to do this right, but at the moment I have hit a wall with my experie

I have a subscription for a MathCAD 10 Student Edition. I got a new computer and couldn't figure out how to download the software and transfer the license over to my new computer. I downloaded the latest MathCAD 11 and activated a trial version of it. Can I transfer my existing license to my new computer?

Our team kept running into issues and frustrations with converting large quantities of MathCAD Prime calculations into PDFs ready for engineering submittals. Too much time was wasted with monotonous tasks or tools that didn't work right.We built an app that lets you drag and drop 100+ MathCAD Prime calculations and batch-publish them to PDF. You can even choose to get individual PDFs or a single binder at the end with all files combined. We even built in a progress bar with estimated time remaining, an error log for troubleshooting, and, best of all, background processing. This means that instead of losing time while files are being published to PDF, our team can start the process and continue using MathCAD Prime on other calculations.This is a tool that we would have purchased if it existed, but since it didn't, we built it ourselves and figured we'd share it with the community. Link below if anyone's interested. Happy to answer any questions. https://ssellc.gumroad.com/l/mathcad

We're thinking of using MathCAD Prime. One of our key requirements is to be able to programmatically print MathCAD Prime files to PDF (i.e. with no user interaction). I know this is possible with MathCAD 15 (you automate printing to PDF from the commandline with MathCAD 15 by adding the "-p" option after the executable and before the filename), but I cannot see how to do it with MathCAD Prime. I've been looking through the API documentation: https://support.ptc.com/help/mathcad/r7.0/en/index.html#page/PTC_Mathcad_Help%2Fmathcad_and_automation_api.html%23. It says that you can print MathCAD Prime worksheets, but I cannot actually find this documented anywhere.Please could you let me know how to do this, either from the API or from the commandline?Thanks for your help!

I am using Creo Parametric Release 11.0 and Datecode11.0.4.0In reference to Article - CS126394, I don't understand the provided workflow.

Hi everyone If a have a nested matrix like this one below and I want to exclude the first row  of each small matrix in the original one How can I do that , when I try (submatrix function) it excludes the first matrix , but I want to exclude the first row of each matrix by the way my ORIGIN =1 I'm expecting the answer to be like (X sub ) in the second picture Thanks Yusra  

I am using Creo Parametric Release 11.0 and Datecode11.0.5.0组装图里插入零件后没有拖动箭头？第一次进去没有拖动箭头，二次进去才有重启后第一次就有拖动箭头，然后不知道因为啥，用着用着第一次就没了，然后就得像上面说的，二次进去才有姓名：邓工邮箱：442787729@qq.com

Hi thereI have a problem with this function . The issue is R is a cumulative value so the R2=R0+R1> R3= R0+R1+R2 and so on... I wanted to implement that in this function but an error ( must be a vector ) shows Is there a way to fix this or to write it differently Thanks The sheet is attached prime 11 

I'm trying to get the piping weld numbers that can be created in the piping module, and that can be seen as annotations in Creo to also be exported to the pvz file format. That way I can see them in Creo Viewer. I've ensured that the annotations can be seen in the Viewer and have also added normal annotation Notes so as to verify that annotations are exported. They are and can be seen, but not those related to the weld. Any ideas on why and suggested way of fixing this? Thanks,Erik