Mathcad

Hola a todos, acabo de actualizar a la versión 8 prime y ahora no puedo encontrar el vector de respuestas.¿Tengo que usar el bloque de resolución obligado? personalmente me parece más cómodo la herramienta "solve, x"  Hi everyone, I just upgraded to 8 prime and now I can't find the response vector.Do I have to use the forced resolution block? I personally find the "solve, x" tool more comfortable  

Can you please tell how to solve a system of ode in prime ? Also a single ode with Laplace in mathcad prime 6?

After embedding excel component within worksheet when an input is provided the excel convert it to SI system if the unit system is set to USCS any suggestions?    

HelloI am trying to copy a matrix that is used to look up structural shapes from Prime 8 to Excel so I can update/add information, then copy-paste back into prime. Is this possible?

Hello,I would like to get a program in Mathcad that: given being a function with a certain number of parameters and a certain symbolic expression, f (p1, p2, p3, p4, ..., pn): = a certain symbolic expression that involves these parameters: p1, p2, p3, ... ,pn, to automatically obtain the following:1.  Symbolic calculation of: 2. Numerical calculation of:Given finally the numerical values ​​for the parameters: p1, p2, p3, ..., pn, calculate the numerical values ​​for the expressions of the derivatives from point 1.Example for the case with 3 variables: p1, p2, p3: 1. Symbolic calculation: 2. Numerical calculation The idea is that I want a Mathcad program that calculates automatically what I want regarding the two points above (point 1 and point 2), meaning to give me as output both the symbolic calculations and the numerical calculations, in the form of parameters, as shown for example in the example above (Sp1, Sp2, Sp3, Sp4, Sp5,

I am trying to use Odesolve. I think I am solving the same equation written in a slightly different way, but in the second way I am getting an error when I try to plot the solution.

I'm currently doing some calcs on the land-speed of a vehicle. From my other calcs, I obtained the wheel-motor's speed in RPMs, and the tire diameter. However, when attempting to obtain the speed from MPH, the calc seems way off. I did it by hand and used an online calculator. and they both gave the correct speed. What am I doing wrong, and how do I get the correct speed calc? 

Hi,I'm somewhat new to mathcad and trying to solve an equation with a solve block. (see attached)Tried several things, but without succes, I don't know if ti actually can work? perhaps with a for-while loop?The equation is quite straight forward with some forces and lengths, resulting in a summed moment, for which I would like to find a 0.  Can anybody help to achieve this or help me in the right direction? Kind regards, Casper

Dear all,I would like to extract the results from my Mathcad Prime run into Excel, but I’m not able to do so. I looked at the PTC community page but all suggestions given there do not work for me. I think it has to do with the way I run my calculations: I integrate in steps of 200 iterations and store intermediate result in a matrix and run the whole thing 'pmax' times (thus total number of iterations is 200 x pmax).I would like to extract the output from a certain row and column of matrix for different data points (1..pmax) and export this to Excel. For example, I would like to extract (Yt_ii)1,3 with ii := 1..pmax. Hope anyone can advise.

Is it possible to to index the summation for odd numbers in 15?

I have a table with a column of text and a column of associated numbers.  Is there a way to align the columns so they are left justified instead of centered and can you hide the " " needed to insert text? This is what I get when I add text, but if do separate text from values, then dont align 

Is it still possible to get legacy MathCad anywhere?

Hi! I'm trying to make a template for engineering calculation for hydraulic cylinder sizes and was wondering if there was a way to do the following: I have a function that spits out a number. I'd like it to be able to find the closest match to this from an array/matrix that I've already made. For example, lets say the calculation spits out a minimum necessary size of 3.054. The next available hydraulic cylinder sizes that would work is 3.25, then 3.5 then 3.75 then 4. I'd like it to spit out 3.25 as the answer. Thank you!

I am trying to solve a equation as provided in handbook but no matter if i use units or not I am not getting the correct result. I tried with applying units but somehow it gives me wrong solution 

Function f(x)=cos(x)  x: 0,0.1..2pi

Is there any way to copy a column of data from@ MS Excel and paste it into a Mathcad matrix?

I am unable to locate where the engineering references/books that were present in Mathcad 15 now in Mathcad Prime 8.0. Can someone point me in the right direction? Does my company need to add this as a service?

Hi Team,I know it is a long shot. But I hope there is a way to do this. Suppose I have 2 matrix with very different number of rows and columns, say A is M x N and B is L x K. How can I divide each element of A matrix with every element of B matrix and Have it in a form of Matrix.  I am trying few things with nested for loops but have had no luck yet.Thanks in advance,Kadhir 

Hello, I crashed PTC Prime 8 and the saved file is not able to be opened. The file is 93.8 KB so I think the work should be in there. If someone could help restore the file, I'd greatly appreciate it. - Rathet 

Some time I can just fix it by restart my computer.

I am trying to solve equation symbolically but when i try to evaluate it gives me error 

No matter what range i change i am not able to show 3d plot data. Anyways how's the range should be chosen for such scenarios 

Example: 

Team, I'm trying to do some curve fitting with the minerr function but it's not working. Any advice? The LambertW function routine is working with other Mathcad Prime 8.0 workbooks. Thanks,Dr. Atlas

Here is a misbehaviour (already present in real Mathcad, too) that I would classify as a bug, since IMHO an implicit multiplication should be treated exactly the same as an explicitly stated one. An implicit multiplication should be just that and nothing more, not additionally an implicit pair of parenthesis, too. And, yes, I am aware that some authors use different parsing rules and give priority to implicit multiplications over "normal" multiplications and divisions. But I am not aware of a reliable source that would give implicit multiplication a special place in the order of operators. Although no authoritative literature, Wikipedia also does not grant implicit multiplications a special position. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations May well lead to endless discussions ... (just search the net for  6:2(1+2)=? ) 🙂