Windchill

Hello All,I am looking a solution inside workflow for getting the iba vaues of wtpart to wtdocument.An example, i have a document and this document connected to wtpart by described by document.I have an iba at wtpart called "MATERIAL" and i have an iba also for wtdocument called "MALZEME".So i try to set MALZEME on wtdocument by getting to value of MATERIAL on the wtpart.Ho we can establish this programatically inside workflow.Thank you for your assistance.

Part duplication is a widespread issue across the manufacturing landscape, often leading to increased costs and inefficiencies. If your organization has implemented a part duplication reduction strategy or is in the process of doing so, we want to hear your story. Your feedback will help us design a better solution for this costly problem. Sign Up Here!  

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: I have a Creo assembly and want to associate it with an article using the 'Owner Link' type, but this option is not shown.Description: Cant activate Owner-Association.

When I'm selecting ALL it should display all data from the specific folder, instead its showing blank neither folders nor Part or Documents 

I do see a file present in windchill_home/codebase/LogicalAttributesSite.xmlWhat can be configured using LogicalAttributesSite.xml file?

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: We want to use Variant Baselines (Object: wt.lotbaseline.LotBaseline) in a more official way (a prototype that represents something between 150% and 100% and that is officially released for specific countries). Therefore we would like to release the Variant Baseline itself, by meaning adding it to a Change Notice and drive the change workflow to state "Released".Description: It is not possible to add wt.lotbaseline.LotBaseline to the ChangeRecord because it is not selectable in the relationship contraints of the ChangeRecord. Does someone know why or is someone experienced in Variant Baselines? 

Hi ,In WC12 for every resulting object the default target state is blank How we can able to remove that or Is there any way to disable it? @HelesicPetr 

Version: Windchill 12.0 Use Case: I have a use case where a supplier role should not see what security labels are used. When I tried to give the supplier user only the Windchill Base (Does not have Security Label / IP Protection license), still that user can see that wizard step of "Set Security Label". I also did not find a Profile action for "Set Security Label", we only have "Edit Security Label"Description: I have a use case where a supplier role should not see what security labels are used.When I tried to give the supplier user only the Windchill Base (Does not have Security Label / IP Protection license),still that user can see that wizard step of "Set Security Label".I also did not find a Profile action for "Set Security Label", we only have "Edit Security Label" Need a suitable solution approach

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.1 and Datecode with CPS 12.1.1.0目前我们使用的是12版本的Windchill，用户端需要将SolidWorks升级成2025版本，请问WGM集成是否支持。如果需要支持，有什么办法？

Old topic reference - Windchill Workgroup Manager - Siemens NX CAM - PTC Community 请问这个问题有解决掉吗 我这边有同样的问题 能分享解决办法么

Hello, i'd like to remove Plans from Product -> Plans -> PlanI have not possibility to delete. How can i do it?   

We have Thingworx Navigate platform where we have deployed 5 apps. We are using Windchill authentication for logging into Thingworx platform. There are two apps which requires manual access and rest of the apps are available for all the users.We are facing issue when user tries to login with different combinations of uppercase and lower case letters which in turns create 5 different username in Thingworx platform. Windchill does not have this issue. What are the ways we can prevent these situation.

I might not be doing things proper but trying to learn and do an upgrade in place (kind of) of Navigate while upgrading Windchill. Goal is to get to 9.7 and WC 13.0.2.  I have a clone on my test Navigate system and my upgrade target Windchill at 13.02. DB is SQLServer if that matters for Navigate. Thingworx appears to function and I can authenticate (which is to Windchill). I can see main page and Composer. I made sure all of the Odata connectors, integration connectors and proxy connectors map to the new temp hostname (-upgrade for my rehearsal 1). At the current time, I have not upgraded Navigate since I wanted to validate its functioning properly first. I have some custom apps which their own Odata connections and they seem to function fine. Its just the OOTB navigate apps that do not work. If it just as simple a running upgrade to bring it to 9.7 which would be supported with 13.02,  I can do that but its a one way street. If something else was wrong or it should work as

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: unable to access to below portal. https://fieldacademy.ptc.com/learn/signin Description: unable to access to below portal. https://fieldacademy.ptc.com/learn/signin  

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: How do users train on this featureDescription: OK, maybe I'm late to the game but naming a feature in Windchill "Actions" is like naming a carrot "vegetable".Anyone know where the training / user story into is on this feature in Windchill 13.Risk and Reliability? 

i need to add an editable Additional Comments column to Affected Objects table to be used in Problem Report and Change Request.How do i do that?1. created new attribute called ADDITIONAL_COMMENTS2. added to Affected Activity Data type, wt.change2.AffectedActivityData.3. i updated the com.ptc.windchill.enterprise.change2.change2clientResource.java with the following: @RBEntry("Additional Comments") @RBComment("Label to be used in the Table Views") public static final String CHANGE_LINK_DESCRIPTION2 = "CHANGE_LINK_DESCRIPTION2";4. updated the wncWeb.jar file- what else do I need to do??- I want to make this attribute editable while adding parts to Affected Objects. Right now, it does not allow to do so.The only OOTB attribute it Comments is editable.

I am using custom CAPA Evaluation workflow which has nested Workflow getting triggered on conditional routing. However as soon as the nested Workflow is trigerred I get the email notification for the first task, however few seconds the workflow gets terminated and moves ahead to next CAPA investigation workflow Below is the process manager for Terminated WF task Nested Workflow for CAPA Due date Extension  

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 11.0 and Datecode with CPS M030-CPS18使用WorkflowHelper.service.workComplete自动完成任务，会丢失投票的审批记录，请问这个问题怎么解决，或者有没有其他API可以保留投票审批记录联系邮箱：tim.zuo@csrbtx.com联系电话：13410013707

A poll (also seeing if anyone has any unique ideas) For industry specification items that have no unique part numbers (such as materials) which may call out multiple variants/sizes/formulas. What do your Windchill parts look like to make them unique?Call out industry spec and identify the variant separately (note, comment, etc)Call out industry spec and variations as NumberCompany unique part numberCompany Specification to assign part numbers to the variationsCompany Identity Cross-reference/equivalent drawing/documentVendor specific part number...?We've had some internal debates and I thought it would be interesting to poll the Windchill community as I've seen it done many different ways at different companies. I've seen it common with materials which can be bought in various sizes/shapes/amounts, but even some items such as piping fittings could have a specification that doesn't call out a specific part number identifier. Connecting to an ERP system or using Windchill MPMLi

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.1 and Datecode with CPS 12.1.0.0系统的3D模型能否做到只关联一张图纸，如果关联了两张图纸则会关联不上

Version: Windchill 12.0 Use Case: we have build a custom wizard which contains the MVC table builder . Data for this table is provided via custom Bean object with getters and setters for each column . Now i want to get all the table data rendered in each rows in my formprocessor doOperation method .Description: we tried to get the table data using the below  api , always i am getting null  as return value .commandBean.getInitialItemsByName("ext.plm.builders.PLMCustomTableBuilder")Steps to reproduce this issue :1.Create the custom wizard with table builder like below public Object buildComponentData(ComponentConfig compConfig, ComponentParams compParams) throws Exception {NmCommandBean nmCommandBean = ((JcaComponentParams) compParams).getHelperBean().getNmCommandBean();return new PLMDemoTableBean(nmCommandBean);}@Overridepublic ComponentConfig buildComponentConfig(ComponentParams componentParams) throws WTException {ComponentConfigFactory factory = this.getCompo

Hi folks,How to manage SolidEdge legacy with Windchill?There is any kind of documentation available about this subject that can help me to estimate the amount of effort & risk to implement it?Best regards,Irineu

Hi Guys,I have a question to a topic which is currently really annoying me. I tried to create a custom table with MVC at first like described in this PTC Article:https://support.ptc.com/appserver/cs/view/solution.jsp?n=CS113931(I also tried the Customization Guide Windchill 10.1 M50 from page 590 to 627 and page 264 to 291. But I didn't bring a step forward.)It sounds very simple to me, so I tried to realize it in my testing instance. Just to see how a new table integration works in Windchill. I have done that before only in Windchill 9.1 with JSP code. Point 4 and 5 are not so clear to me so I have done it like shown in the screenshots. For point 4 see screenshot3_custom-actions.xml. For point 5 I tried two options, first with the custom-actionmodel.xml and second with the PartClient-actionsmodels.xml directly (see screenshot4 and screenshot5)I. But both options don't give me a table in die relations tab in Parts. In screenshot 6 you can see the registering of the custombuilder in the

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: filter report by name of more than one userDescription: filter report by name of more than one user

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: I am working on an InfoEngine Task that queries for multiple object types, as well as several attributes from each object, with a read-only Operation Identifier.Description: Dear PTC Community, I've encountered some frustratingly strange behavior, and can't wrap my head around why this is happening. In our I*E Task, we take a list of input objects, and create new PersistableAdapters to access the data within: PersistableAdapter pa = new PersistableAdapter(object, null, SessionHelper.getLocale(), OperationIdentifier.newOperationIdentifier(OperationIdentifierConstants.VIEW)); For this case of Attribute  `state.state`, we process it as follows (abbreviated):PersistableAdapter objAdapter = pa; AttributeTypeSummary ats = objAdapter.getAttributeDescriptor(attribute); DataSet ds = ats.getLegalValueSet(); if (ds != null && ds instanceof EnumeratedSet && loadedValue != null){ LWCEnumerationEntryValuesFactory ee