CAD

The note for a cosmetic metric thread (in our Creo5) look goofy when they specify an M16.000 thread with a 0.500 pitch. I have had no success with the various "LEAD TRAIL ZEROS" detail options. These notes don't seem to have the same functionality as our regular hole notes (for which we have created our own versions) Does anyone know of a solution for this? Thanks, Vince  

Hello Community, I got a very weird licensing issue.I have 8 Creo View MCAD licenses and I want 6 of them to be accessible only to 6 named users. So I modified the ptc.opt file like this on my license server :  GROUPCASEINSENSITIVEGROUP CVMCAD username1 username2 username3 username4 username5 username6 RESERVE 6 PVMCADPRO GROUP CVMCADRESERVE 6 PVPRO GROUP CVMCAD Problem is : for one specific laptop, it is impossible to open Creo View MCAD if the user is in the CVMCAD group :- Creo View Lite = OK- Creo View MCAD (username1, in the CVMCAD group) = NOK- Creo View MCAD (username2, in the CVMCAD group) = NOK- Creo View MCAD (username7, not in the CVMCAD group) = OK The same test has been done on another laptop (but the exact same type), but with different results :- Creo View Lite = OK- Creo View MCAD (username1, in the CVMCAD group) = OK- Creo View MCAD (username2, in the CVMCAD group) = OK- Creo View MCAD (username7, not in the CVMCAD group) = OK I don't

For s=10*10^-9 and T =293, I obtain two different values of V_mag. Why? The mcdx file is attached herewith. pls help. I know the correct answer is -0.261 for V_mag.  I wanna plot V_mag/k*T with s later on.

I formatted my PC and I want to reinstall Mathcad Prime 9 because I have a license but it won't let me activate the product, what can I do? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Translated the topic from Spanish to English using google translate - Subject - Como volver a activar una licencia que tengoBody - Yo realice un formateo a mi pc y quiero volver a instalar mathcad prime 9 porque cuento con una licencia pero no me deja activar el producto, que puedo hacer?-By Community Moderation Team---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Is it possible to transform and rotate elastic objects(pipes, harness etc., which possess elastic behavior) using CreoView MCAD. They behave like rigid objects when they are transformed and rotated. Can someone please help me by letting know if this is possible using CreoView MCAD or can we split the elastic part into smaller sub parts and then transform/rotate them?

Hi community, I am trying to measure the maximum and minimum stress at a point for a specified coordinate system (shell model). In other words - I am trying to asses the bending contribution in a plate by measuring the maximum stress (on for example the top of the plate) and the corresponding minimum stress (on the bottom of the plate). Frustratingly, you can not measure maximum and minimum stress directly at a point, so I have set the spatial evaluation to "Near Point"  and specified a small radius of 1[mm]. This measure is applied to multiple points in a pattern as shown in the attached screenshot. Multiple measures can be applied to the same point.  The parts containing these measures form part of a larger assembly/sub assemblies. Before adding the measures, analyses run past the "Begin Engine Bookkeeping" step in the run log in a few seconds. After adding the measures, the analyses is hanging on this step - it hangs indefinitely and does not provided a

Hello,we are getting this error PRO_TK_CANT_MODIFY (-48) trying to assign a parameter value or creating a new parameter. I found this https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS419066: from Creo 10.0 on, object are requested to be in checkout state to modify parameters, when used with Windchill.Do you know if there is any options to workaround this?As developers, we need to revise and complicate our logic flow to add a checkout to our customization routine. That could be expensive and time-consuming.Thanks a lot 

Enable Volumetric flow rate & volumetric flux in section window of post processing Creo Flow Analysis. Can anyone suggest any workaround? when will PTC introduce these variables in Creo Flow Analysis ? Is there any development / work going on related to this subject?  

There was a problem installing the application. The first time I installed it and worked in it. Then the application disappeared from the computer by itself. When you try to download it back (it shows what has been downloaded), it does not appear on the computer.

Currently have PTC Mathcad 14 on my old machine and i downloaded mathcard 15. i tried to transfer the License.DAT file from old to new and it says there's a problem. i re-run the wizard and select the license.DAT file and it says import successfull or something to that effect. i close the window and re-launch the program and get the same issue.. I tried installing mathcard 14 and did same thing and get same issue. i'm trying to retire my old computer and put it on the new updated system.please advise.

I hope everyone is doing well. While plotting a graph, I receive an error.Please assist me in fixing the issue.Please find the attached document below. Thanks and regards.MSRAZA.  

Hello, everyone friends, please ask, creo nc how to use 5-axis processing glasses model.

Toolkit for Java and Python (how we can use it to automate our design process)Paint calculation based on the surface are of a part (we are currently doing it manually, would prefer to know if there is any automatic process)BOM Creation without repeat region that shows the material required per partDXF creation for Sheetmetal parts with 1:1 scale that can be used for nestingAutomatic drawing creation

What software do I need to open and view a .pha file?  I tried Creo View Lite, but it doesn't support it.

In this episode, NASA give us very special access behind the scenes at Kennedy Space Center. NASA has been pushing the boundaries of space exploration for decades, and today, the Artemis program is the next giant leap. With a mission to return humans to the moon and venture even further into space, NASA is embracing cutting-edge digital engineering to make this vision a reality.    

This is the function I need to reach  f1 and qc are matrics >> so I define another variable nthen I define M(a,b) to multiple dz by n then I define Mi,north to multiple qc by n Then I get the results equal to NaN  So I used filterNaN function  and after doing all of this >> I didn't get the answer hhhhhhIs there any away I can simplify the function I want, and get the answer The sheet is too long this , I couldn't explain what I need in shorter sheet>> sorry  page 19 prime 10 

I have seen this before, just can't find it. We are thinking of creating BOM tables to compare different assembly configurations in a single table. Is there an easy way to do this in Creo?  Assembly 101 Assembly 103 Assembly 105 Assembly 107 Part number Description X X X X 101 Main Piece X   X   102 Support A   X   X 103 Support B X       104 Top Cap 1   X     105 Top Cap 2     X   106 Top Cap 3       X 107 Top Cap 4

So I've been working on a very simple part with some GD&T callouts and have now encountered my fourth issue trying to do basic annotations (Creo 6). This time, I've noticed that attaching a runout callout to a surface results in a filled arrow in the feature control frame (I'm not talking about the leader arrow). When attaching to a witness line extending from the part object line, the symbol in the feature control frame turns into a stroked arrow. See attached image. This is frustrating because attaching to the witness line is the only way I've found to enable a gap between the FCF and the object line when placing the FCF against a surface. Another question so I don't keep making posts, how does one callout a set of chamfers that were all made in one set of the chamfer feature tool? Show Annotations gives me AxD dimension, but not the 2X callout. I added the 2X in the attached image, which is not parametric and thus not preferred.

Hello All, Software Version: PTC Creo Parametric  9.0.3.0 We are trying to use the repeat region of a drawing table to input assembly data from left to right. However, the system default inputs this information from top to bottom.  Specifically, we have a cable assembly that is made up of a single cable and a terminal on both ends. I would like the repeat region to input the data horizontally rather than vertically. We are using the repeat region symbols:asm.nameasm.mbr.nameWe have tried the asm.mbr.name:1 or :2 to see if the code will have the individual part for the respective column but this did not populate. Is the below example possible, or will the system default always be a vertical entry and there is no possible way of changing it to horizontal? Want to have Table Example:Assembly PN          Cable PN         Terminal 1 PN          Terminal 2 PNAssembly 1  &nb

I am using the ANSI Flare Bevel weld symbol in PTC Creo 8.0.8.0, and there seems to be a large space between the flare bevel symbol and the flush and grind symbol. So much space that the flush and grind symbol hardly appears to be applied to the weld symbol.  Can this space be reduced relative to the rest of the symbol? Or maybe another solution? I've tried changing the font size, but this makes everything smaller. I've also tried the different weld symbols (simple, combination, braze, and ISO) but none of these options are a good solution.  Not looking for a solution involving adding a sketch line and/or Text Note.  Thanks for your time,Kevin 

Hello, I have created an MBD with several notes that contain a hyperlink to another combined view. People in the factory can click this link and the corrosponding view pops up. This works in Creo Parametric (10). However in Creo view it only works when you click the actual text instead of the text box. So for example the empty space inside an "O" is not clickable.Is there a way to fix this?

Hello, everyone. I am looking for a way to identify cabling/harness elements, specifically ".prt" type by using a repeat region.So far, by using "asm > mbr > type" it is possible to identify parts, assemblies and skeletons. By setting the repeat region to find certain properties in the parameters, I can identify sheet metal and piping components. But, I have not found a way to identify cabling parts. Yes, in my case I have them modeled from the cabling application. Yeah, I know there are some repeat regions configured to list cabling/harness properties, BUT I cannot enter 1 by 1 in the subassemblies and set them as primary model for my tables. Then: I need to find a way to identify cables from a master assembly or top level. It can be by invoking a parameter/properties to include in the repeat region that only cabling elements have. Or any other identifier.NO: at this stage of the project I cannot add a new string parameter saying it is a cable. I ha

Hi there ,I have a nested variable called x =[k v m] as shown in the screen shotI need to divide x by n  which means that each row in x will be divided by n >>> so k/n , v/n, and m/n>>>> the result should look like xThanks in advance

TLDR:  Is there a way for a table BOM balloon to have multiple leaders pointing to the correct objects? We have finally made the move to tables and balloons in our newly created assembly drawings.  It took  14.56 seconds after we went live for a user to bring up a scenario w/o an immediate solution. When we were creating dumb part number notes we would create a leader to each part in an assembly.  Example would be PEM fasteners in a plate of sheet metal.  If there were five of one part number in one location and six of another part number in another location, we would just put a leader to all items of a part number Now that we have moved over to balloons we are using split quantity balloons (image balloon_1.png).  To accomplish the same result we would need a balloon on each part.  In this case we would need 14 different balloons for the two part numbers.   What the user ended up doing is shown in balloon_2.png.  Get

Hello All, I am trying to recreate the solutions in Prime 10 to a 'characteristic equation' from a technical paper involving the Bessel functions.The equation to be solved is shown belowThe first 10 solutions is given as: However it appears that the solve block essentially just returns my inputs  I have removed all units as I recall in the older versions of Prime that units in the solve block tend result in errors. I have never had to use the Bessel functions, so I am not sure if I am overlooking something or making a simple error given how the equation is stated. Can anyone review and provide some guidance ?