CAD

Ok...I thought I could do this, but I keep getting two holes in the center.I've created the center hole and am trying to pattern one to the right, horiz, 100mm, and one to the left, the same distance, in the same command. I can pick the two directions and offset, but keep getting a duplicate hole in the center. Number of members in both directions must be two or I get an error.I would think this can be done without getting a duplicate hole in the middle, but maybe not? If someone could shed some advise I'd greatly appreciate it!

I need Creo to try to prove to a worksite that I am a good idea to hire, but I never got my confirmation and records essentially say that I never made a request, I tried to resubmit but I can't since my email was already registered somehow. What do I do?

I am trying get one user our single Premium Design license, but it is not working. Are there any tricks in formatting the ptc.opt file so it will assign the license where I need it to go.I have verified that the location is correct on the DAEMON line of the license file. I have formatted the line in ptc.opt as:RESERVE 1 PROE_DesignPrmP:44 USER <uername>We are  running Creo 12.4.3.0Anyone have any ideas of what to try?

Creo does not follow the Windows convention of taskbar status following to the monitor where the window is located.  This causes slow downs in workflow, and is how every single other modern windows program works.  Can Creo be updated to follow this convention?

WOW  trying to get a trial version of Creo is not an easy task.  I had multiple meeeting with Digital Account exec and then several calls to support.   Anyway, I was told to put this request in here.  We are looking for a trial of Creo to test in our manufacturing environment before making a purchase. Can anyone assist?

The error message states some advanced resources used previously, like advanced springs and weighted links, can no longer be used with the current student license.Hello. I currently have a CAD model I’ve ran some analysis last year using the student version. I’ve used some “weighted links” and “advanced springs”. I recently updated the license with student version still for university research as an undergaduate student. However, I can’t run the model with the license anymore.Is there any way out, is it possible to have a few days trial on the advanced simulate so I can at least finish the model or edit it without losing the information I’ve previously studied? For instance, I have damping coefficients and the values spring stiffness I’d like to recall.It would be great if I could run some more analysis on that model. Even if it was for a couple of days.Thanks for the support. 

Hi everyone, I’m Andrew at TriStar. A customer’s question about moving from Creo 7 gave me the idea to put together this guide covering newer capabilities. There’s so much out there, I wanted to simplify a bit.I used AI to help build it. I can’t claim this is PTC’s or anything. Just a detailed doc pulling links and info together.For anyone who upgraded recently is there anything you wish you checked before you did? I’m sure I missed some things, would love to beef this up even further.Any advise is greatly appreciated!Andrew Dunkelberger | TriStar 

The Customer using Creo Parametric Release 7.0 and Datecode7.0.8.0 When we apply the force/servo motor for the dynamic analysis it's not working properly.

Hi everyone, How to Create Summation from this Formula If you guys have any idea of thisPlease tell me how to solve this 

I don’t know if anyone in the support portal watches this space, but…1) The link to PTC community is still to the old site.  Still pointing to “https://www.ptcusercommunity.com/”  See figure below.2) I think you might be able to claim free credit to close out CS415853 with the work done to close out CS457962.Figure 1 - Web element with wrong link 

I had Creo 11 installed back then, but had to delete it in order for my Formula Student PLM server which only worked on Creo 8, so i deleted Creo 11 and installed Creo 8 only to find errors in installing the Creo Parametric and Creo Common Files upon setup, it always showed pending prerequisites and then stopped responding, so I gave up on that, and tried to install Creo 11 again for my own personal use instead, but even that is now not working, showing unsuccessful installation of Creo 11 Platform services, which means Creo Parametric 11.0.5 also won’t work. I have university licenses.

I'm getting an error when running tasks in CREO: ERROR CODE:3 (SUBCODE7). I've already contacted NVIDIA; we've updated the driver, rolled back to older versions, and tweaked the graphics card settings, but the error keeps coming back. The card is a Quadro P400.   

Has anyone got any training materials or tips on using Creo manufacturing functionality to program a wire EDM machine? We have a “Complete Machining” license. I’ve been using the standard 3-axis milling functionality (with a 0.010 inch “endmill”) to generate the necessary G-code for 2D profiles. It’s fine, I guess. My problem is when I need to define non-2D cuts. I’ve been resorting to creating points at the different Z heights of the cuts and “processing” them via Excel to create G-code with the necessary X, Y, U, and V values. It’s not fun.So, if anyone has been doing wire EDM programming and wants to point me to any information that might make it more efficient for me, please let me know. Perhaps there are 4- or 5-axis methods that would work, with the proper post-processor? Will I have to write my own post?

Hi,when with Mechanism I run a pressure angle analysis for a simple circular cam with an eccentric follower, the result is always 0.Instead, it should yield a constant value other than 0.Could someone please explain why Creo provides this incorrect result?Am I doing something wrong?🤔If cam radius is 150mm and follower eccentricity is 100mm, pressure angle should be approximately 41.8 degrees, not zero.Thank you all for your time and help!Gigi

need a api to check wihch workpsace objects belongs to.

I am using PTC Mathcad Prime 12.0.0.0 (Academic). Whenever I change a result’s displayed unit, the calculation region turns grey and dependent expressions stop evaluating. Automatic calculation is enabled, but the AUTO indicator remains orange.Simple example: Define d := 3 mm Define a := d³ · π and evaluate it. Change the result unit from L to mm³. The result displays approximately 84.823 mm³, but the region stays grey and a subsequent evaluation of a shows “?”. Recalculating the worksheet does not resolve the issue.

Hello PTC Community,I would like to know if there is an option in Creo Parametric to restrict the placement of section arrows to the appropriate parent view in a drawing.Consider a drawing sheet containing three projected views and a sectional view created using a datum plane. To indicate where the section is taken, I use the Add Arrows functionality to display the cutting plane and its direction on the corresponding parent view, for example, Section A-A.However, Creo also allows me to place the same section arrows on another projected view, even when that view is not the intended reference view for the section. From a drawing standards and documentation perspective, this can lead to incorrect section representations and confusion.My question is: Is there a configuration option, drawing setup setting, or other functionality in Creo Parametric that restricts section arrow placement to the correct parent view and prevents users from placing the arrows on unrelated or inappropriate views?

Dear Sir or Madam, I am writing to request your assistance with renewing my Mathcad student license, as I need the software for my current studies. I have tried to renew my license through the usual process but have unfortunately been unsuccessful. I would therefore be grateful for your help in resolving this issue. Thank you very much in advance for your support. Kind regards, Holzinger C.

Hi, I have an active Mathcad Prime 11 Student Edition subscription. After a hardware replacement on my PC, my product code no longer activates, and the License Management portal shows no products on my account. Please reset my license so I can activate it on my current computer. Thank you, Noah McGuire 

Currently exported sheet metal flat pattern DXF contain a layer CSYS with XY arrows.This layer is not needed and could confuse the laser cutter system.But there’s no option to remove the layer?I’ve tried mapping it to BLANK or “”, but it’s still included. 

Hi, I usually input the number of pattern instances using the parameter from the model into a drawing note and that will display the number of instances. Now, when I do that, it includes the suffix, which it never did before. Is there a setting I can change that toggles this behavior? I am using Creo 9.0.12.0.For example, with a feature patterned 4 times:Before: &p267 would display “4” Now: &p267 displays “4 EXTRUDES”I can manually delete the suffix text as a workaround, but I’m curious what changed from “before” to “now”.

Hi everyone,We use Mathcad Prime at work, and our license is managed through our own company server. My employer gave me the IP address and port details to enter into the settings for activation. However, I can't seem to find where to download the actual installation package.Our IT support told me to get it from the Mathcad website, but I can't find it there, and I don't have an official PTC account to log in. Any advice on what to do?

Hello,I am a new user with CREO. When I remove a splice and place it on another branch it creates this loop from the prior splice location? I circled the prior and new location of the splice.my following steps: delete splice Insert component and place splice on next branchAm I missing a step or doing something wrong? there is two wires going to the splice, but I did not delete those. Thank you! 

This is only a little annoying and I’m on Creo 8 right now, maybe this has been patched out. But has anyone else hit a limit for repeat regions in a BOM? I have it refusing to fill out the 12th repeat region and just has the first cell filled out with the parameter and session ID of the assembly. ex: &asm.mbr.material_spec2:195If there is a fix let me know. I have so many columns so I can edit single lines in notes so half the BOM is off paper.