CAD

Draftsmen have two Screen, how to proceed to display Creo in only one window ? (a extended mode) Thanks for your help Best regards

Dear Team,We operate in an environment where several industries use Creo Parametric for the creation and editing of appearances applied to parts and wires. We are currently using Creo Parametric version 12.0.2.0.We would like to suggest an improvement related to the organization of custom appearances. Currently, all created appearances are grouped under the “My Appearance” tab, which mixes appearances intended for wires, solid models, and sheet metal. This limitation directly affects organization and workflow efficiency.Our suggestion is to allow the creation of new custom tabs or categories within the Appearance Manager, enabling users to separate appearances by application type (wires, solids, sheet metal, among others).This functionality would significantly improve ease of use when creating and editing appearances, as well as provide better color organization. As a direct result, it would also help reduce design time, leading to increased productivity and cost savings for companies.

Pro/Toolkit link error: “unresolved external symbol ProDimensionBaselineDirectionGet” — which library to link, and how to map APIs to libs?I’m building a Creo Parametric Pro/Toolkit application and I’m hitting a linker error when calling ProDimensionBaselineDirectionGet().Error : unresolved external symbol ProDimensionBaselineDirectionGet referenced in DIMVisitAction(...) — LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals.Already added libraries : protoolkit_NU.lib, pt_asynchronous.lib, ucore.lib, udata.lib, kernel32.lib, user32.lib, wsock32.lib, advapi32.lib, mpr.lib, winspool.lib, netapi32.lib, psapi.lib, gdi32.lib, shell32.lib, comdlg32.lib, ole32.lib, ws2_32.lib.Questions:Which specific Toolkit library contains ProDimensionBaselineDirectionGet()?What’s the recommended way to determine the required library for any given Pro/Toolkit API (e.g., doc index, API Wizard mapping, or dumpbin on .lib files)?Thanks in advance for your support!!

Bonjour,J'aurais besoin de télécharger le flexnet pour gérer la licence Mathcad.Cordialement

Hi there! I want to get one value interpolated from the parameter, obtained from the calculation routine.The goal is to perform interpolation of the curvature value Curvature (Alef, the second output's result) as a function of the bending moment value (Moment, the first output's result) from the given value of M_fact. By using the "linterp" function, I got stuck with the error message:"The elements in this vector must be in ascending order". After reviewing the relevant topic on the PTC forum, the only possible solution was to start the list of matrices at 1, yet my attempt to set ORIGIN:=1 hadn't worked. I use the Prime 10.0.0 version of the software. The file with the problem is attached. I'd be very appreciative of any assistance and advice regarding the issue. 

Hi, i hope to be in the right place for my question.I'm playing with Creo Live and i'm doing some CFD analisys on a mecnanical structure, i've manged to have the simulation running (it's similar to the wind tunnel example file).I was trying to get the total forces on a body or a set of surfaces but i have zero cluse on how to setup a measurent.Any help is wellcome.

The Bad Idea Fairy was drunkenly wandering through my brain, stomping down the grass with his size 13 boots, singing off-key, scaring the squirrels, and littering the place with ... well, bad ideas.   However, whilst I was pretending to tidy up, I looked at one of those ideas and thought, "Hmm. Maybe he'd stolen that one from his twin brother, the Good Idea Fairy (you can't tell them apart, sometimes)?".   The idea? "Now that Mathcad 11 has introduced Python Scripting, maybe it's time to introduce a Mathcad equivalent of PEP 20?".   Instead of proposing a "Feature Request" or reporting a suspected bug, perhaps we could introduce an MEP (Mathcad Enhancement Proposal)?   Starting with:   MEP 00 – The Zen of Mathcad   1. >>> Range Variables Are Not Vectors <<<.2. Think in two dimensions for layout and data.3. Be like Zathras-- cover all possibilities. Zathras does not want other people being confoosed.4. Yesterday's friendly hard limits

Hi all,I'm working in Creo Parametric Mechanism to model a pinion and crown gear assembly with axial/radial offset between their axes. This is not a standard intersecting-bevel gear setup — the pinion and crown gear must mesh with a deliberate offset between their axes.However, when I attempt to apply the built-in Bevel Gear Connection, Creo throws: "The references for bevel gear connection are not coplanar”.How can I simulate bevel gear kinematics when the pinion and crown gears are offset (i.e., non-coplanar axes)? 

I need to retrieve the X, Y, Z, and C offsets of all components in an assembly relative to the main part’s coordinate system. Ideally, I’d like to export these values into an external file (CSV or TXT).Is there a built-in method or mapkey/API/Toolkit solution to automate this?

Hello,Would it be possible to request an enhancement to ModelCheck?Specifically, I would like ModelCheck to be able to verify the Bend Allowance settings. For example, I would like to check that for sheetmetal parts, the “Bend allowance driven by” option is correctly set to be driven by the material.Even further, I would like to validate that the Sheetmetal Preferences are consistent with the smtdsnsetup.smd configuration file.Thank you in advance if this request could be considered.Adrien Blazy  

I'm using MathCAD Prime 9.0.0.0. MathCAD is always forcing Units of Measure. Usually it'll choose appropriately based on the data going into it. However, sometimes it's wrong or uses weird units and won't allow me to override. A work around is I can not use units at all or I can put in a 2nd equation without units, but I shouldn't have to do that. One of the advantages to MathCAD is I can use multiple units in the same equation and MathCAD knows the difference. In this case...I want......but I get...I want......but I get... Thanks,      Brent

"Problem. A Poisson stream of requests arrives at a single-channel queuing system with loss. The time between the arrivals of two consecutive requests is distributed according to the law  the service time of requests is random and distributed according to the lawFind using the Monte Carlo method over a time period T=30 min: a) the number of served requests; b) the average service time of one request." If possible, please provide screenshots of the solution to the problem using Mathcad so that I can understand and clarify the essence of the solution..  

To whom this may concern,  Looking for help on how to setup Matrix headers for the attached.  I would like to have a Title above each column for each variable, and the corresponding units shown in the matrix. See remarks in red within the attached.  Many thanks,Iain  FYI, I use Mathcad Prime 10.0.0.0 

 Creo+ continues to deliver new enhancements designed to accelerate your workflows and boost productivity. With over 40 new enhancements across user productivity, composites, ECAD, simulation, manufacturing and more, Creo+ 13.1 helps you to deliver your best designs in less time than ever before!Smarter Electrical Design: In Creo+ you can now build harnesses as assemblies for structured data management, component reuse, and easier collaboration in multi-user collaboration sessions.Intelligent MBD: Pattern recognition in GD&T Advisor helps to define patterns, capture design intent, and maintain associativity for faster, more accurate annotations. As your model evolves, the pattern recognition feature will adjust accordingly.Advanced Surfacing: Enjoy smoother, higher-quality surfaces with improved flexibility in control point manipulation and faster performance – even on the most complex models.Simulation Upgrades: ANSYS solvers have been upgraded to version 2025 R2 to deliver e

I am using Creo Parametric Release 12.4 and Datecode12.4.2.0Hi, our company recently installed Creo 12.4. It is now in the standar configuration (inch, pound, standard ambient, exc... ). We want to transfer the personalized configuration from the version used till today (Creo 9) to the new installed version. How can we achieve this?PS. We have also a Creo Simulation pack.

Hi AllI have a surface in a copy-geom which references many features in my model.I now want to create a surface feature and remove the copy_geom so that it is no longer dependent  on my skeleton model.Is there a way to reroute all the references in one go?Creo Software version 10.0.8.0

无法发起case安装不了

Dear PTC Support,I am a student at the Linzer Technikum (HTL Linz, Austria), using a full educational license provided by the school.I am unable to activate Mathcad Prime when I use my personal laptop outside the school environment (on a different home network/internet connection).The license activation fails with the error: "(-9) Invalid host." (License status "Ungültig" / Invalid).Steps taken and results:Using the License File: The license file (...sw_license_email_738123.dat) fails because it appears to be tied to a specific network/host ID present only at the school.Using the License Key: I have attempted activation using my assigned license key, but it resulted in the same error. I can provide the key privately. This also results in the same "Invalid host" error and the key then becomes invalid (or tied to the incorrect Host ID).Key Issue:This is happening on the exact same laptop. The issue is solely dependent on the change in the network connection. My classmates, who followed t

Dear PTC Community, I have Mathcad-11 from the 1990's, & I need to reinstall it after a HDD failure. However, PTC (Mathsoft) doesn't run their license server anymore & therefore, the product cannot be activated. Can someone please assist ?

Dear PTC Community,I am working on a system of coupled nonlinear equations and attempting to solve it using a Mathcad Prime 7.0.0.0 Solve Block. The solve block runs without errors and returns numerical values for my unknowns. However, when I validate the solution outside the solve block, I find that one of the variables ( J), which appears in two different model equations, gives two different values when recalculated. I expected these equations to converge to a consistent solution for J, but they do not.In other words, even though the solve block returns values for three different variables (J, E, ε), the two J expressions do not evaluate to the same value of J when I recompute them using the solved ( E and ε).I have attached my Mathcad file.Could someone please review it and help me understand why the solve block returns a result but the two governing equations do not match when checked afterwards?I would be very grateful for your insight. Kind regards,Tadele

Hello, Looking for an explanation of some strange results I am getting in Creo simulate.  I am wondering if I have the model setup incorrectly.  The model is not that complicated.  its a bolted assembly with some external masses (sensors) that are associated to the bracket via mass elements and weighted links.   I am trying to understand displacement of the mass elements when they are excited at resonance.  The oddity I am seeing is the massive displacement at frequency 0 (clearly not a real result).   Any help or thoughts on this matter would be great!  See the details i have posted below.     

Hi All, I'm resurrecting an old thread as I am curious if PTC have resolved this modelleing limitation in later releases. I did try to message the moderator to reactivate the old thread but was informed it is best to start a new one:  Re: How to model a helical sweep cut that matches ... - PTC Community Does anyone know if this is now possible in later relases? I am currently using 7 but no updates here.  FYI my part does not have a standard helical pitch, I have datum curves generated by co ordinates, so it would not be possible to use the volume helical sweep which I beleive was a new feature added to V 7 to tackle this issue for set pitches. 

Dear community, I can't add Insets to my figures.When i my collegeas open the same file they can add it.I can change the added insets from my collegeas.The mouse pointer stays the  same.

Hello all, Does anyone have an example of how to use G93 in programming 4 axis contouring work with Creo Manufacturing?  We have a machine with this capability and I'd like to try it. So far I have been able to get the post to put G93 in the right places, but it puts a F0. for feedrate. Even if it did work, I am not sure how this really works.  G93 as I understand it interprets feed commands as inverse time.  So if my feedrate in IPM is 100, but G93 is active, the move will occur in 1/100 seconds?  How can that be right?  A short move takes longer than 100IPM would linearly and a long move takes the same amount of time so it moves much faster than 100IPM? Maybe I am misunderstanding how that works, but that is how I read it. Thank you for any help!Matt 

I am using Creo Parametric Release 5.0 and Datecode5.0.6.0Creating branch is manual cabling showing dotted line so unable to create wire or cable