Codebeamer

Hello everyone, I am currently working on a Excel template and I wanted to replace ${item.subjects} whose format is [Key-Id] - Name.Some issues appear when I import back the file and I want to avoid them.I wanted to export my upstream fields in a format : [Key-Id] format.(The format is the same as the one added when Work Item Key-IDs Setting in a tracker.) Do you know if there is a command like item.id or another way to create this format ? It seems easy but I did not find any documention mentioning a list of command available for default fields. Thanks for your time  Current viewExpected view       

Does anyone know how to add Excel templates?I thought it would be similar to the word templates but it doesn't show up like the word templates do. Is there a separate folder for the excel templates?

Hi, I'm trying to customize an Excel template to export the different fields of my Issue tracker (see issue_tracker_fields.png for the fields). The "basic" template from codeBeamer does what I would like to do for the exported data but I would like to customize its style, for both single and multi row options (enabled through the GUI). Exported Issue tracker using default codeBeamer template with multi-rows enabled: export_issue_tracker_default_template_multirows.xlsxExported Issue tracker using default codeBeamer template without multi-rows enabled: export_issue_tracker_default_template_singlerow.xlsx My custom template: issue_tracker_custom_template.xlsxActual export results: export_issue_tracker_custom_template.xlsx Note that the multi choice fields are only: "Owner(s) and "codeBeamer item(s)" Could you please help me to correct my template to achieve similar results?If you have access to the default codeBeamer export template file, that could

for 30 day free trial what are all the permission we will get

Does anyone know how to create a codebeamer report or cbql query which does the following? For Test Runs in a Test Run tracker, compare the modifiedAt field with the corresponding Test Case modifiedAt field, to generate a report of test runs that are out-of-date (i.e. the test case has been modified more recently than the the test-run, so the test-run may need to be re-run)

Iam using 30 day free trial. I assigned as Regular User. Iam unable to access Resource through API

在Table视图下，无法使用shift按键批量选中部分条目。是否在此视图下增加此功能

Hi,I'm trying to discover if it would be possible (and the best way) to create a "unified" document view for a project that inherits multiple system specification from a common project (in a way that it would be easy for the reader to understand the whole project, without having to jump between two different projects). So in the project that imports the system specification I created a field that has a reference to the parent project (optional, populated if the item requires some feature from the parent project).I then created a "traceability document view in the tracker, which includes "show Descendant Items" (which just became greyed out). My objective would be to show the referenced item (Camera coordinate system) with all of it children. So for someone reading the document it would seem like a single document containing both the child and parent project specification (called using the reference).Any ideas, suggestions? Is there perhaps a better way of doing this? 

When adding multiple filters in Codebeamer, it makes the data difficult to view, as the filter status bar takes up a lot of space. See attached screenshot - adding 3 filters takes up ~half of my viewing area. It would be great to have a "collapse" option that allows you to hide these filters. 

When exporting to a word document I am using the item.description MergeField to identify where I want to the description to be placed in my template. For some reason, all my merge fields match the formatting in my word document, except for item.description. Is there a way I can modify the formatting for this within my word template? Specifically, I want the text bolded, and center aligned, but it comes unbolded and left aligned every time I export. I have already tried switching the formatting from \* MERGEFORMAT to \* CHARFORMAT to no avail.

I have a customer requirement document that has the following format:Heading 1[Some description]Heading 2[Some description]Heading 3[Some description][requirementId-101] text description for requirement[requirementId-102] text description for requirement So when I import the document, I end up getting Heading 3 in its own requirement, which in this case it includes the description and the 2 requirements (Customer specification sometimes even has 10 of these requirements). So my question is, how can I import each [requirementId-XXX] into its own requirement in the tracker. Having too many requirements from the customer into a single requirement in Codebeamer is making it difficult to accurately track traceability. The customer document is in Word and won't be sending us any intermediate files btw. And a side question... can the requirements not have a Summary?

Hello all, I´m currently experimenting on the codebeamer capabilities of importing an excel specification. I have two different baselines of the excel specification and wanted to see how capable codebeamer is in comparing those baselines. I edited the files with the same VBA script to add the intendation to get the hierarchy into codebeamer which worked just fine with the first baseline of the excel file. After I imported the more recent baseline which includes some changes, some work items in codebeamer were removed out of the previous hierarchy and placed on the highest level in the tracker. Those affects work items which haven´t changed between the two baselines and also the intendation is identical in both excel files. Also there are work items with identical parameters (parent item in CB and intendation in excel) where one remains in the hierarchy and the other one is moved. After I had discovered this behaviour I did another import of the recent baseline without ch

Has anyone experienced Codebeamer server down entire of today, 505 error and found any resolution for it?

Defects are normally either standalone items or are downstream references from test runs where a test run has been executed and a defect has occurred during that execution.  The traceability browser reflects these in reverse, as the defect appears upstream from the test run which is logically incorrect. We believe this error should be corrected; how are other life science companies addressing this?

Hello Team, Im new to Codebeamer and training myself on the basics. I am working on "Install and Manage Codebeamer Instances" Course. In the module 4- Configuration and management for cb user , 1st activity , I am not able to authenticate for user in testing. Attached is the screenshot of the error.  Error msgs below.  Can you please direct on how to get this issue resolved ? I had raised a ticket earlier and was directed to post in community. Kindly me let me know if you need further information on this.   "Error message : LDAP/Active Directory authentication failed: Failed to borrow DirContext from pool.; nested exception is org.springframework.ldap.OperationNotSupportedException: [LDAP: error code 53 - UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM: Bind failed: Cannot Bind for Dn uid=admin,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com]; nested exception is javax.naming.OperationNotSupportedException: [LDAP: error code 53 - UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM: Bind failed: Cannot Bind for Dn uid=admin,ou=P

Hi,   I am trying to install the Codebeamer. When I was following up on the Wiki to install it, I found the Parent Page is empty:   Thanks,  

Our customer would like us to set up a job that regularly polls a directory and if data is found, it should be imported into Codebeamer (CB). It's about a daily job that runs in the background and validates and processes external data. We had hoped that CB's Job Manager would fulfill this task, but it is only used for reports and we have not found any other option yet. Does anyone have an idea how to implement this requirement with CB?

Every time a Test Tun is created, the Release field is automatically filled with the first Sprint of the project. Is there a way to turn off the automatic filling? I hope to improve the function of turning off the automatic selection   Translated by the moderation using Google Translate -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   每次创建Test Tun时，Release字段自动填充为该项目的第一个Sprint。有无办法关闭自动填充，希望提高一个选择关闭自动选择的这个功能

We want to use the Excel export for Reqs tracker - in Table view mode I can adjust the columns / attributes of an item and save this view. Upon Excel export we correctly see only the selected columns; no Excel template is selected in the Export options, only the default oneBut when I choose the cb document view and export to Excel, then the columns do not match the selectionAny idea why? How can I set up the selection of columns in Document view?

Hi, I am researching about the Integration of code beamer with CAMEO.I am exploring alternative methods to integrate Codebeamer with CAMEO without relying on an OSLC server. If anyone has experience with such integrations or can suggest viable approaches, I would appreciate your insights. If yes,Please provide the brief description about it.   Thanks,AL_12731379

Currently, all items assigned to the release/sprint are counted in the release dashboard and considered for the item burndown chart.In my configuration I would like to distinguish between planning elements (User Stories & Tasks) and work product elements such as requirements. The burndown diagram is intended to show the burndown of user stories or tasks.On the right I can filter by Type (Tasks or User Story), but this filter is only applied to the item list and not to the burndown chart. Unlike filtering by teams, where the filter is applied to the list and burndown chart.Questions:Is there a way to apply filters to the burndown diagram? (similar to Team filter)Is there a way to basically define a filter on relevant trackers for the release/sprint dashboard? (similar to the planning view) 

During test execution, when the last step is marked as passed, the entire test run is automatically closed. However, there should be a verification process in place to ensure that the system doesn't allow the test run to close unless all steps, including those prior to the last step, have passed. I would like to request a change where Retina checks if all steps, not just the final one, are marked as passed or failed. The test execution should not be closed if at least one step is still incomplete or failed, even if the last step is marked as passed or failed.

Does codebeamer can be configured with OOTB functionality to allow only project manager to have download access to the documents and restrict to others project members.? Project members are subjected to make changes in document.

In codeBeamer, there is a Trash menu that provides a restore function for deleted items.Currently, to restore a deleted item, users can search for the item by entering the summary text. However, if there are many Items in trash, additional search methods are needed, such as searching by content, items deleted from a specific tracker, or assigned users.It would also be helpful if users could review detailed information, such as the description or fields of the deleted item, in the Trash before proceeding with the restoration. Is there any other way to restore items besides using the Trash?

Hello,I'm wondering if there is a way to "wrap text" similar to excel for traceability reports in codebeamer.   I see that the width is editable via the pixels check box for traceability reports (using codebeamer  2.2.0.1) however, when the width is expanded the text doesn't wrap to to the vertical space below.  For items with large text fields, I have to expand the column to almost the width of the screen to view all the text.  This is cumbersome and makes the traceability report screen almost useless since you cannot see all the information on one screen.   Is there another setting or option that help adjust this? Thank you!