Recently active
Hi all, after some discussions with my colleagues here come some more topics regarding document structures and document usage in the old and new client: 1. documents should be always editable in different views. So it should be possible to work with a document no matter if it's in a view where you see only one chapter or segment or if you want to see it as the whole document. 2. the need of migrating a document from the old to the new client is seen in a more sceptical way. It should always be possible to work with a document with the old and the new client, at least for already existing documents. No user has to be forced to use one or another UI, because another user has migrated a document. kind regards, Jens
Hi all, again a question which comes to my mind within meeting 8: At the moment we're preparing for a huge project migrating requirements from Doors into Integrity. As stated in meeting 8 current documents in Integrity has to be migrated into the new UI to have full functionality. For us this means at the end that we have to migrate twice, or that we have to wait until the new UI is feature complete. I dont think that my bosses will be happy with that. And independent from this point: Are their any work at the exchangeability from Doors (or other RE-Tools) to Integrity and vice versa? You maysay that we will exchange them via ReqIF, but with the new UI will come some new structure and maybe some new functionality: How compatible this will be with ReqIF? At least: If any click in Integrity, no matter if its in the new or the old UI, will have the effect of loosing some information in the document in a way that i cannot work with this document in another tool
At first thanks to you to be part of the session to get an overview of your future plans. Based on the presentation of today I have several questions Is the new document view and outline view the only existing view in the document? Will this view be applied to each kind of document or only to these documents which have subdocuments included? How can we ensure to get a view of the document, which is “readable”? Our business units work close together with our suppliers How should we ensure to run filters through the whole document? Are we still able to export the documents to Word, Excel, ReqIF? If several types of content is able to be stored in the document, the attributes in each of these types might be different. How can you ensure, that filters and exports will be configurable to these documents? We plan to migrate from doors to Ingegrity. What does it mean to migrate this data? Which impact will we get for reuse of information, branch of documents? Based on the issues Martin iden
Hi all, in Meeting 8 Marting was presenting some new proposals about the document handling in the new UI. One point is very interesting for me: It was stated, the current documents will be working in the old UI and maybe will only readable in the new UI. If i want to work with such a document with the new UI i have to migrate it. Does this mean that this document is unusable in the old UI from this time? And what about documents which are branched into many othe documents? If i migrate one of these branched documents and some of the other will stay unmigrated, how will this work? With all the traces and stuff? And how can i merge some content created in a branch at the old client into a document, which is already migrated? Thanks, Jens
We are using many Java customizations to get special Word/Excel exports/imports, charts, formatting, trace propagation and cross domain copying in our integrity clients. How do you plan to integrate those features in the Web Gui?
Hi all, we're using a massively customized data model for our requirements and change management in Integrity, far away from any standard solution. With the new UI i'm a bit worried how PTC will ensure that our complete data can be used with the new UI as now in the rich client. Are there any thoughts at PTC about this? kind regards, Jens
I have not seen any recent meeting invites. Is this group still ongoing?
Hello All, This message is in case you have missed the mail notification from Kartik Oak that went out yesterday.We are back to discuss more topics with you, starting on the 6th of September 2017. We are looking at having an hour long conversation with you dedicated to the topic of Documents and more specifically Document Structure. We may not cover this in a single session and hence would have to meet again a week later for continuity. Event Integrity Lifecycle Manager UI Replacement Work Group Meeting-8 Event address for attendees https://ptc.webex.com/ptc/onstage/g.php?MTID=eb9e6cdaeaaa1d42b0a977f973e6a4d14 Date and time Wednesday, September 06, 2017 6:30 pm India Time (Mumbai, GMT+05:30) Event number 805 613 666 Event password PTCILM-8 Audio conference To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you join the event, or call the number below and enter the access code
Does anyone know how I can create an Ampersand (&) text symbol, or a shortcut to use it as text in a symbol? Creo does not allow "&" as text in my title block symbol?
Hello All, We have been sharing our meeting recordings but since all of you may not be using Cisco WebEX internally and may find it difficult to view these recordings, we have attached an installer here that will allow you to view the recordings that we are posting. Alternately you may download from the Cisco WebEx official site inline with your internal IT guidelines.ThanksKartik Oak
Hi all, as we have many tools around Integrity in our environment, which helps us to have functionalities which Integrity can't deliver itself, we were wondering how this will work with the new UI. We have built an adapter to connect to Integrity and this adapter is used by the most of the above mentioned tools. This adapter is mainly using the client-side API at the rich client, because this client is already installed at the machines of our users. But the rich client will be obsolete in the future and it is also not an option to install the client only to have an integration point for accessing the API. So at least our adapter has to be reworked to use any new API, and certainly this will also change some way to use this adapter, so the connected tools needs changes too. We need some time for this, therefore we need info about any plan for an API or any other way to connect to Integrity as soon as possible. Thanks, Jens
Does any one have worked with creating a column in the UITree "ProUITreeColumnCreate". I could not find any sample in the installer path.
I'm a new Creo user but not new to the 3D world. What I'm looking for is the 3D PDF capture views. Solidworks has a MBD package that is sold separately but that MBD software Solidworks has allow me to make views, details and the PMI for the 3D PDF. What I've seen in Creo is the ability to create 3D pdfs but not the way I am used to. Is there a software program I have to use for Creo? I was told the MBD is in Creo. I have seen the GD&T, annotation feature and the Datum Target annotation feature commands in CREO which are the geometric constraints which I'll need but where and I do I make the views that carry over to the CAM operator.
I am trying to use a synchronous application (dll) to launch an asyncronous application within Creo 2.0. I want to pass the connection ID to the second application but I am hung up on using the ProEngineerConnectIdGet() and ProEngineerConnectIdExtract() to get the connection id as a string. It is explained in Document - CS129952 but does not go in detail on these two functions. They are breifly mentioned in the user guide (tkuse). When I try to use them in my program, they expect arguements and return either proerror or boolean results. Can anyone give me an example using these functions?
Can some on help me i whant 2 use comma when i enter values in creo. now i can only use dot like (45.25) i whant it 2 be metric (like 45,25)I have search for its bot no resualt. the closest i have come is decimal_marker bot it dossent work.
I make a lot of models that involve pyramidal frustrums (transition of a rectangular section to another rectangular section, linearly). Rather than use the measured value calculated by Creo, I thought I'd have a go at calculating the volume directly from the dimensions.When I check my calculations, the volume calculated directly from the dimensions differs from the Creo analysis result.I minimized the accuracy value, but still get the exact same result.Here are my simple valuesBase rectangle: 5 X 3 -> Base area: 15Top rectangle: 4 X 2 -> Top area: 8Height: 1Frustrum of a pyramid volume is Volume = ( Area Base + Area Top + SQRT ( Area Base * Area Top ) ) * Height / 3 = 11.3182Creo, on the other hand, gives a volume of 11.3333.Anyone have any insights into this? This is simple shape, and kind of scares me about what might be happening with more complicated geometry.
Hello All, I sent an email a week ago to members sharing the status of the community page and the workgroup, if you haven't noticed the Groups have been migrated to the new community page. We are working on a plan for the next topic and will keep you all updated on the logistics of how to join the meeting thru this group. Thanks Kartik Oak -
In the new note editor the cursor shows as black when editing a note. When using a black background this makes it very hard to find where you're going to start typing. Is there a way to change the color of the cursor?
Buenos diasestoy intentando exportar una pieza solida a DXF en Creo parametric 4.0 para mandarla a una maquina laser, pero al abrir la pieza me dicen que ven muchas rallas y recutangulos sin sentido aparente, es decir, no pueden abrir bien el formato DXF desde creado desde CREO, pero si lo pueden abrir si hago la misma pieza en otro programa CAD. ¿Que puedo hacer?
Hi,I want to explode the notes into Geometry. I mean I want to convert all notes into Geometry. That Geometry can be anything like line, polyline etc.Is there any command in Creo by which I can select the text and explode it into Geometry?Let me know in case the question is not clear.Thanks,Dhimant
Hi,I would like my style curves automatically to be included in a specific layer so they will be easy to hide. Is that possible?Thanks in advanced.Hans
We have some pretty detailed workflow diagrams on some of our processes here. Would there be any value in sharing them with you guys? I'm not sure if I can or not, but if it would be valuable to this effort, then I can look into it.
Is this a "discussion group" only, or are there periodic live web meetings / conference calls?Forgive me, I am brand new to this portal and do not know where this effort stands by simply looking at the different discussions. Sorry for the potentially "silly" question here.
extern ProError ProFitGlobalinterferenceCompute( ProAssembly assem, ProFitComputeSetup comp_setup, ProBoolean set_facets, ProBoolean set_quilts, ProBoolean fast_calculation, ProInterferenceInfo **interf_info );when the Arguments fast_calculation = PRO_TRUE, The function in Creo 2.0 M100 return PRO_TK_BAD_INPUTbut in Creo M050 is PRO_TK_NO_ERROR! why?
Hey! Anyone wanna share M19622 stuffing tube models?WayneFCreo3
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.