CAD

Hello,  We encountered the following message (shown in the first picture) multiple times when saving a Mathcad file that contains an object from AutoCAD LT 2024 (inserted using the "Insert Option"). After saving and reopening the Mathcad file, the AutoCAD object is deleted, as shown in the second picture. We found this issue on all machines running Windows 10 & 11. Kindly advise on how to resolve this matter.I am using Mathcad Prime Release 11.0 and Datecode11.0.0.0     

Hi everyone, I recently downloaded Creo 11 on a machine with Creo 7 in order to test something. After deciding to test on my virtual machine, I uninstalled Creo 11. I now get this error in Creo 7: When checking the logs, the error reads: EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION has occurred in the thread 3772. I've tried clearing cache and reinstalling. Any ideas?

Prime 9 File attached.  

I attached abbreviated work sheets. Question regards echo sheet. How do I pass secondary ohms to the matrix?  I can't seem to define the values as ohm(sec) in the matrix.  Secondary ohms are (ohms value) multiplied by (CTRW/PTRY).  I have a hunch that I don't have units set correctly in the definitions area. I made an attempt at showing values using the table function.  That was a train wreck except I can set units as secondary ohms.

Is there a way to imbed the str2num function into a lookup? Is there a means to automate renaming or concatenation of the variables in the first column of the text file? What is the type of variable is ["600"] ?  I guess it's not a string variable?

I'm using Creo 9.0.9.0 When I open the Creo Parameteric Options window, via the command File -> Options -> Options the window the dialog window that pops up is so wide that the options are  not on the screen. They are shoved off-screen to the left. I can't resize the window with the usual Windows arrow keys, mouse clicks, etc. It will let me make the window wider, but does not allow any decrease of window width.  Is there a way to access the window settings for this dialog to correct this situation? I tried looking for any sort of settings in the Windows registry, but nothing seems to be stored there.

Hello everyone!I have a spare PC to use in case my current PC crashes. Is it possible to install Prime on both PCs using the same license? (Sorry for my ignorance!)Thank you for your reply.Regards.

I've now gone from Prime 10 Express to Prime 11 Express,  This allows me to see worksheets that have been created in Prime 11.  However, does anybody know if there are any technical or other capabilities in Prime 11 Express that are not available in Prime 10 Express?  I can't find any.   Alan 

Gentlemen, please evaluate my attempts to perform the development of an inclined cone, maybe there are comments and something can be corrected or replaced?

HiDoes anyone know how I can export my multifluid results from a transient creo parametric flow analysisI am using Creo Parametric 12.4.0The button "save animation" does not work  

I am using Creo Parametric Release 6.0 and Datecode6.0.6.0How to identify any part used in what are the assemblies?Basically, need to know, in how many assemblies, the specific part been used.

Hello All, Is mathcad prime-9 generally slowly in terms of Auto calculation or refreshing the values?  Also, if i change a variable , a lot of calculation  turns into a light font as if it is still processing the values as i am showing below.  Seriously terrible as compared with mathcad 15. Thanks,Sam

Looks like there's a way in China of converting Mathcad 15 spreadsheets to Maplehttps://www.bilibili.com/video/BV181421z7aJ/

While creating a part with Model Based Definition utilizing semantic references, when we select an annotation, the edges and related surfaces highlight, but in a way that’s hard to distinguish edges/surfaces. When we select “Semantic Query” the highlights are much more obvious and useful. Looking for a method or setting for making the “Semantic Query”-style highlight for annotations the default behavior (without having to click semantic query first). Snapshots of the current behavior and desired behavior when selecting annotations that contain semantic references below.  Current behavior upon annotation selection: Desired behavior upon annotation selection:(Note: image above shown utilizing semantic query, desire is for that step to not be necessary)

Hi guys, I am having some issues with matchad, as soon as i move to another page I am not gettig units in my cal so this above is from same worksheet but outcome is different and i am wonderign its something to do with settings? Thank you Antony  culaton and the previous page is working fine can someone tell possibly whats going on?

Good morning everyone,I’m working in Creo Parametric 9.0, and I’d like to know whether it’s possible to directly convert a standard sketch into a cosmetic sketch, without needing to recreate the geometry from scratch.So far, I haven’t found a straightforward method, I'm wondering if there’s a dedicated feature or workaround that allows this kind of conversion.If anyone has experience with this or knows an efficient solution, I'd greatly appreciate your input.Thank you in advance for your support!

Hi, i have a bit more complex problem which actually consistas of two simple problems.Model structure of most of our hoses looks like thisbut for some reason when doing save as in windchill it does this to analysis featureit measures only part of a curve (composite curve)using JS API i need to get curve and check if it's a parent of a analysis but here comes an interesting part when referencing part of a composite curve it still creates parent connection how can i check if analysis references whole curve but not it's parts and in case of referencing only part of it repair analysis feature to reference whole curve When i'm using model.ListFeaturesByType(false, pfcFeatureType.FEATTYPE_COMPONENT) i'm getting feature curve which than i can't convert to curve to use listElements() when i want to get it from model.ListItems(pfcModelItemType.ITEM_CURVE); it doesn't provide anything like there is no curves in model but they clearly are even in the tree 

hi, I'm having trouble with solver block in mathcad, i find the varaibles  

Hello, I have created a drawing template with bom tables pre-set so when I create the drawing, everything is already in place. The issue is, I want it to read a specific simp rep on creation. And right now it seems that "Master" is the only option? I have already searched for threads about this and found one..."Creating Assy Dwgs - Is there a way to pre-set the Simplified Rep?" However, the post is from 2014 and the links to a solution seem broken. I'm hoping that since that was posted 11 years ago, surely they have come up with a proper way to address this? Any help is much appreciated. Thank you!  

Hello everyone,The settings for the cutting planes do not correspond to the ISO standards (ISO 128-2:2022, ISO 128-3:2022). - The end segments should be marked with a long-dashed dotted wide line.- The end segment must be exactly long-dashed-long- The arrow must be centred on the last long segment. I can't find these settings anywhere.Is there a solution? We all want a digital MBD world, but at the moment we still need 2D drawings, so a standardised representation is absolutely vital.

Somewhere along the way, I increased the size of the window that pops up when you execute a File->Options->Options from the ribbon. When I do this, it brings up the usual cascading list of main options, sub options, etc. But, annoyingly, the window I see is so wide that the actual selections are pushed off the main screen. What I find when I attempt the normal Windows thing of grabbing the side of the window and moving inwards is that it doesn't allow this. I can make the window larger in the horizontal direction, but it will not get smaller. Anyone know if this is something i can adjust via a .ui file of some sort, or do I need to access the registry to fix it? In the old days I'd be able to hit the registry and find where this window is getting its initial size specs, nowadays we're locked away from such things.

This season’s Mathcad Community Challenge is an open-ended creative challenge: design and implement a game within PTC Mathcad Prime! I’ll be hosting this challenge.   Mathcad Community Challenge Summer 2024: Game Gallery   For our purpose, a game is defined as an interactive, structured experience with an achievable goal that has a beginning state, then allows for user input that can advance the state as the user tackles a challenge or solvable problem, followed by an advanced (intermediate or ending) state.As a good example, see my first reply to this challenge below. This challenge will be quite lenient on what a game is and the production values you put into it, though you should test it and make sure it works as intended before submitting it.   Games take a long time to concept and execute, and for that reason, this challenge’s submission period will last until the end of September (September 30, 2024)! Expect the blog write-up on Mathcad.com to come out sometime in

Good morning, PTC Community: Objective:Given circle ID, and fixed value "a" for the equivalent in area & perimeter ellipse, goal seek the value of b.I am encountering a "These units are not compatible" error. See attached.Using Mathcad 10.0.1.0.Your assistance will be appreciated.JT

Hello, i like to calculate  force FA depending on three variables hS, hA, Hz. Mathcad calculates FA and put into a vector. Finally, i like to have the maximum of this vector. Typing max(FA) gives back the whole vector not the single maximum value. Also for mean and other functions. Thank you for your help.

Hello, I'm working with Creo 10, and I need to do some modifications in a model and its external data programatically (through Protoolkit API) based on  some information contained into a XML file which is the primary content of a Windchill Document. I'm wondering if there are methods defined in API which can help me to do that, I don't want to modify the file, only read it. I tried to retrieve the document by using the "ProServerObjectsCheckout" function but it didn't find anything. I'm not sure this is possible since I don't see defined any appropriate handler (ProSolid, ProDrawing, etc.) for WT Documents. Thanks.Ivan B.