Creo+ and Creo Parametric

In Creo assembly design, is it a good practice to first validate the concept using Layout, then define a Skeleton model, and finally create parts within the assembly using skeleton references?Does this approach help avoid assembly issues, or are there better recommended workflows?

I have old ProE workspaces but I cannot open them. I get this errorerror messageIs there anyway to open these? I know there are files in there because I was able to open them with an old copy of ProE. That is no longer an option. Any ideas?

I Create Perforatted sheet Design,Draw 4mm sq Shape and Corner in 1mm Radius,Using Direction Pattern X and Y, Regeneration process get Long Time Almost 6Hrs,How to Speed Up This Process?

Hello !Using Creo Parametric 9.0.3 here.When I am creating a hole, the default placement type is Linear.Is there a way to change this to something else, like Sketched ? I have looked for a config.pro option but found nothing so far. 

Hello, I have random lines on my part and don't know how to hide them. These lines are the exact ones that show when saving an STL file. Does someone know how I can get rid of them?

In a smartassembly script, is there a way to tie an IF statement to some type of GOTO command?

Hi everyone,I'm working on a Creo Toolkit (Pro/Toolkit) application and need to create a blend feature programmatically.The version of Creo Parametric I am using is 6.0.I have created two sketches (Sketch1 and Sketch2) and need to generate a blend solid/surface based on these two sections. I have searched for relevant information online, but there are almost no usable examples or clear API documentation regarding the creation method of blend features in Toolkit secondary development. Thank you in advance for any insights or code examples.

When I create break lines for bolt heads and connecting holes, the cylindrical surface has no directional selection, so sometimes the break lines connect directly, while other times they connect with a bent line from the back, making it look messy. Has anyone encountered this problem, and how did you solve it?

用自由式制作造形，想在现有的基础上修改一下，又不想破坏现有造形，采用了复制，但发现复制出来的与原图误差比较大，请问有什么方法可以解决吗 

Hello,I am working on application in Web.Link. My goal is to build text to look like Creo is displaying it when note contains dimensions:Raw text:“This note: &d24”Creo display:“This note: Ø14 +0,05”Web.Link using GetTextLines(“DISPMODE_SYMBOLIC”)“This note: \u0001n\u000214”“\u0001n\u0002” => Ø“&d24” => 14 (dimension value)Regardless of mode I choose “Numeric” or “Symbolic” I can`t get “&d24”. If I have this I could ask for tolerance and build my text exactly like Creo is resolving it.I consider this as an issue with documentation that is clearly saying that when you use “Symbolic” mode text should not be resolved. (the same is for parameters in text)Link to documentation:https://support.ptc.com/help/creo_toolkit/pfcweblink_pma/r11.0/usascii/index.html#page/creo_toolkit/api/dita/t-pfcDetail-DetailTextDisplayOption.html#wwID0EI5XSBIs there a mistake in my approach? Is any one having a wokraound ?

I am looking for people who have personal experience with a company that has done this for them.I know about ICAM, PostHaste and Gpost(Internal)Any other options that are really good?This thread is inactive and closed by the PTC Community Management Team. If you would like to provide a reply and re-open this thread, please notify the moderator and reference the thread. You may also use "Start a topic" button to ask a new question. Please be sure to include what version of the PTC product you are using so another community member knowledgeable about your version may be able to assist.

Just as an update - CREOSON has topped 11,500 downloads! 🚀 🎉Automation is becoming a key factor users and CAD systems in general.Special KUDOS to CREOPYSON project - it is amazing for automating Creo Parametric. (very popular)Also - if you have not seen these -- Connecting Claude to Creo Parametric via CREOSON they are worth the watch. from TechnoholicAI (youtube channel)I Connected Claude AI to PTC Creo Parametric (And It's Incredible!) Claude AI + Creo Parametric: The First Working MCP Integration (Step-by-Step TutorialHappy Automating!Dave

I am using Creo Parametric 10.0.4.0 and performing a Model Check on a part and I am looking at the warning for "Annotations with incorrect surface references" which has the name ANNTN_SEM_REF_TEXT_VERIFY.It is telling me that I have the incorrect number of annotations with incorrect surface references.  I am trying to indicate that there are two surfaces that are 1.450 away from datum B, so in the references, I have datum B in the "first dimension reference" and then the two surfaces in the "second dimension reference."  So why is Model Check flagging this?  Am I doing it incorrectly?

Hey,I saved a volume measurement (shown in model tree) and then I created a paramter using a relation. I want to add a unit to the parameter but it is locked. So how do I add the units to locked parameters?How do I change the decimal value in this drawing title block. I want to show 0.73mm^3 or maybe 0.7mm^3  

I am using Creo Parametric Release 10.0 and Datecode10.0.3.0 使用EZ TA时，定义好TA loop和尺寸公差后，直接会给出结果。但是，这些结果是如何计算得来没有明确的计算公式和方法，希望可以提供便于学习和导入此工具。

Hello allI want to simulate the O-ring contact stress under a certain displacement, when I meshing the part, it pop out the window as below.it seems that there is something wrong with material assignment. the material property is shown as below(just an example, not real case).  the Mooney-Rivlin model was used to describe the material property. Could anyone help me check what’s wrong here?

I have bunch of points here to pick from and create close to smooth surface I exactly need. What is my best practice, tricks and tips for something complex feature like this? SEE ATTACHAny help will be graciously appreciated!CREO is King!

Hello CustomizersSeeking help accessing the annotation from Design items tree can some one help me with JLink  

I am using Creo Parametric Release 7.0 and Datecode7.0.10.0 creo 7.0판금에서 각진 사각형형태에서 플랫, 플렌지를 사용으로 엣지부분을 닫힌 상태로 만들수 있나요?? Here are the errors that I faced creo 7.0판금에서 각진 사각형형태에서 플랫, 플렌지를 사용으로 엣지부분을 닫힌 상태로 만들수 있나요??

I'm creating a macro to automatically select a 3D Curve using the Search Tool.The search returns multiple results and I need to always select the first item in the result list.In Creo, it seems that selection is based on the ID. Is there a way to make it always select the first item.mapkey(continued) ~ Command `ProCmdMdlTreeSearch` ;\mapkey(continued) ~ Open `selspecdlg0` `SelOptionRadio`;~ Close `selspecdlg0` `SelOptionRadio`;\mapkey(continued) ~ Select `selspecdlg0` `SelOptionRadio` 1 `3D Curve`;\mapkey(continued) ~ Update `selspecdlg0` `ExtRulesLayout.ExtBasicNameLayout.BasicNameList` \mapkey(continued) `SKETCH6`;~ Activate `selspecdlg0` `EvaluateBtn`;\mapkey(continued) ~ Select `selspecdlg0` `ResultList` 1 `260:59:`;\mapkey(continued) ~ Activate `selspecdlg0` `ApplyBtn`;

Problem: When creating a countersink hole using the ISO standard (e.g. M2x0.4, Clearance, Close Fit), the outer diameter field is left blank (Ø 0.00) and requires manual entry.Impact: Every time a countersink hole is created with the ISO standard, the user is forced to stop, look up the correct value in ISO 15065:2005 Table 1, and manually enter it. This breaks the workflow and introduces a risk of human error — especially since all other parameters are already handled automatically by Creo.ISO Requirements: The outer diameter field is not a design choice — it is calculated directly from the pilot diameter and the 90° angle that ISO already defines. Creo has all the information needed to fill this field automatically.Optional Expected behavior: The outer diameter should be auto-populated from ISO 15065:2005 Table 1, which fully specifies this value (Dc = 4.4–4.5 mm for M2). All other fields — pilot hole diameter, angle, and depth — are correctly auto-filled from the same standard.Proof

Hey,So I’m trying to create a section view as marked in this picture here But I’m able to create only like a perpedicular linear section cut in the botttle neck region (Below picture is my drawing) Please let me know how to create a section view show in the first drawing. 

Hello all,I would like to gather feedback from this community about how of the long existing "create_drawing_dims_only" config.pro option is being used in your organizations. First let me provide a short summary for the values of this optionIf set to NO  - when creating a driven dimension in the drawing, the dimension is stored with the model (however not visible there). this dimension can be essentially leveraged to another drawing of the same model (but is not really going with the model based approach) If set to YES - when creating a driven dimension in the drawing, the dimension is stored with the drawing only My impression is that many Creo users (and their CAD Admins) have set this option to be set to YES, in order to avoid pushing drawing information to the model  Currently the default value of this option is set to a value of NO. we (PTC) are considering to change the default value of this option to be YES (which seems to be more suitable for

Hi all,Is there a toolkit equivalent of Creo UI operation, “Save as Mirror Assembly” or “Mirror part” available? I’m trying to automate the mirroring of an existing assembly and the associated drawing using protoolkit without recreating the model from scratch? After the mirror operation completes, is there a way to update the existing drawing with its dimensions to reflect the mirrored geometry?Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.Thank you. 

Workflow for creating a 2D repeat region to display family table information.  Covers an alternate method using simple repeat regions to allow the use of relations and filters.  Discusses creation of filters in alternate method, and some related drawing setup options are also covered in addition to column sorting to match the family table display order.