Creo+ and Creo Parametric

Hi, I am currently trying to model a surfboard fin using a fin outline I found online and with an MH32 airfoil profile. I used points to make a datum curve for references to the boundary blend I made.I want to check that this geometry is okay or not as visually I can see at the top of the fin there looks like a misconnection between either blend surfaces, but I can't tell if it is just visual. I used mesh surface to see it looked weirdly shaped at the top and using the reflection you can see it reflect on the top too. Is there any way to fix this if this is the case, or is there a different way to do it with an asymmetric foil shape?Thank you,Joel 

I'm using Creo 12.4.0 When changing the "circ_interpolation" factor, arc_only seems to be broken: "Points Only" simulation does the cut correctly: "Arc only" simulation only does the lead-in and lead-out:This is for a trajectory toolpath.  But it also applies to thread milling.  The "Arc Only" path cuts the lead-in/lead-out only and doesn't cut around the part like it should.  Both appear correct in the toolpath display, but on the simulation (and in real life) the paths are broken. Toolpath Display for either setting: Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug?  The workaround is to choose "points only", but this makes really huge gcode files.  And if I forget to change the setting, it can crash the tools.  

Dear Community I am using Creo 8.0.8.0. I would like to export or extract simulation results in a easy way into a csv-file or other file format that can be imported into excel. Currently I am facing following problem. I have done a Contact Analysis using 2 time step and I also wrote.In the post processing I created a graph using a measure (force) vs. time. Somehow I cannot export the graph. Also I cannot plot two measures (e.g. bolt force vs. input force) that shows their correlation over each time step. Somehow Creo creates several output-files and also folder of each time step but I am not able to find how to use this file and to extract the information I am interested in. Below you find a screenshot of the graph I would like to export into a CSV or other format.Within the post processing tool (Simulate Result) I was not able to export a CSV file. It was only possible to create a "rwd" file. Following I did:- Nonlinear (Contacts) simulation- Output: 6 Ma

Hello All, I am trying to simulate effect of wind load on glass railing holder which is fitted to ground via. screws. so after defining the constraints , contacts and loads when I review the results I observe that the glass holder penetrates into the ground. see attached screenshot.Can you please advise why is it so and how can it be resolved? I would appreciate your help with it.

It will be very helpfull to have ability to influence by check-box additional functionality in roun feature:- add side influence- piece to piece(like we already have in boundary blend feature) for example it is like this at the moment:but when both as suggested properties will be possible to get the result should be like this: 

Hi, Is there a way to rotate the dimension text by 180°? This is what I mean:Old:Rotated 180°: I saw someone suggest to rotate the view 180° in a previous post but this does not work for me. We are currently working with Creo 10. Kind regards,Jaime

Hello, I have a question about restricting the tool within the milling window in high-speed machining (HSM), similar to volume milling. I would be very thankful if someone could share any sample files of HSM. regardsAsif 

I have a huge library of existing parts and assemblies that were all created with the same start part and start assembly files. If I make a change to the start part or start assembly templates, will that have any effect on existing parts and assemblies, or will it only be applied to new parts or assemblies created after the template change?

see attached video for explanation if we redefine the assembly constraint from "by interface" to "manual", the message does not appear anymore in the above assembly.(view in My Videos) @CHENAMA @FF_11835266  

int CreateDrawingFromTemplate(){ProError status;ProMdl currMdl;ProMdlType mdl_type;ProMdlName mdlName;ProDrawing drawing;ProDwgcreateErrs errors;ProMdlnameShortdata solid_model_data;ProName predefined_template;ProName name;// Replace path with dummy placeholderFILE* mf_logfile = fopen("C:\\dummy_path\\dummy_project\\dummy_log.txt", "w");// Get current modelstatus = ProMdlCurrentGet(&currMdl);fprintf(mf_logfile, "ProMdlCurrentGet returned status: %d\n", status);if (status != PRO_TK_NO_ERROR) return status;// Get model typestatus = ProMdlTypeGet(currMdl, &mdl_type);fprintf(mf_logfile, "ProMdlTypeGet returned status: %d\n", status);if (status != PRO_TK_NO_ERROR) return status;// Get model namestatus = ProMdlMdlnameGet(currMdl, mdlName);fprintf(mf_logfile, "ProMdlMdlnameGet returned status: %d\n", status);if (status != PRO_TK_NO_ERROR) return status;// Fill solid model dataProUtilWstrcpy(solid_model_data.name, mdlName);switch (mdl_type) {case PRO_MDL_PART:ProStringToWstring(solid_m

Check out this video on Modelcheck and Performance Advisor by Irena Roggeveen (Creo Product Manager) and Adam Manfradonia (Creo Solutions Consultant).Original Date Presented: August 14th,  2025. 

Anyone know why fluid domain color is red in flow analysis i have add fluid and solid domain and generate the mesh but it not generated for internal fluid domain i also attached the reference image  

Currently it's not supported by Pro/TOOLKIT to do also a "Revise" beside a Checkout of an object from Windchill using ProServerObjectsCheckout() like it's written in Article - CS254712 - What Revise and Check Out options in Windchill PDMLink are supported by Creo Parametric customization.This functionality would be a great improvement for further CREO-releases.

user should have ability to replace/reselect failed references in remove feature like in this example:current functionality is very limited here!User can only delete wrong references or all...Standard selection with <SHIFT> (up to boundary) should be accesible here 🙏

hi All i acutally have the same issue as this post here:https://community.ptc.com/t5/Customization/Using-the-VB-API-to-create-a-drawing-with-a-custom-template/td-p/17502 but the possibilities to fix mentioned there do not work for me, does anyone has an idea? i am using creo 7.0.12.0

In a Design Exploration session, I want to be able to save a STL or STEP file of each solution ; Currently, the save as option is not available

Hello fellow engineers, Recently I updated from Creo 7.0 to Creo 10.0. I am in the middle of a project so maybe it wasn't a good idea. When re-running a buckling analysis that used to return a BLF of about 2.5 in Creo 7.0, now I get values of about 0.5!  Has anyone noticed this pattern? I believe the new 10.0 version is overconservative, as I have done hand-calculations to verify the buckling mode and the plates are nowhere close to buckle.  I believe the solver must have been updated. The model in question corresponds to a crane with a telescopic boom, where the contact pads (usually solids to allow for contact definition, non-linear analysis) are replaced by a beams (linear analysis). 

Good morning community, I have a general question about how Simulate reports rigid modes when "with rigid mode search" is checked.  I created a simple part with a surface constraint and released 1 DOF (in the Z-direction).  I would expect Simulate to report at least one rigid mode that would show the assembly translating along the Z-direction.  The animation does show this but it doesn't say it is a rigid mode.  Wondering why that is?  Is there a frequency threshold before Simulate reports the mode as rigid?  I released 2 DOF of freedom (in Y and Z) and then it does report rigid modes.  However, when I animate it, there is some rotation of the assembly in the first mode which I would expect only translation.  I attached my assembly file.  

I am developing a UDF for screw threads and ports and need some support understanding whether a certain implementation is possible and how to manage references to make it happen.  Insofar, I have defined UDFs with a coordinate system that every other feature ultimately points to and placed these UDFs using that coordinate system and one placed in the model, or the on-surface coordinate system option. My understanding is that the basest feature(s) appearing in any UDF will be what all the other features ultimately reference.  Ultimately, we would like these UDFs to be placed with reference to an axis the screw goes along and the face the screw extends from. However, I'm struggling to figure out if it's possible to manage references in such a way that those are the reference prompts. I have been experimenting for a while and can't arrange datums in a way that accomplishes this.  More broadly, I've been having some trouble defining UDFs to point to anything B

I can't seem to delete a cable break after placing it. I don't see the "X" that is supposed to represent the cable break in the flat model. Anyone experienced this issue?The only way I have been able to successfully delete it is to delete the entire cable segment.

Good afternoon,  I am new to using GD&T advisor, so far as a tool i think it potentially has a lot of benefits. However i am at a stage where i have completed all the GD&T definitions, and now want to add some traditional dimensions, eg. linear dimensions from datums to plane surfaces. When i try it says 'no applicable reference'. I am unsure how i can have traditional dimensions along side GD&T

I am using Creo Parametric 10. I am encountering a similar issue to what is described here: (1) Replace by unrelated component and asm0001 already... - PTC Community. From that, I am able to delete the "asm0001.asm" from my workspace and that allows me to use replace by unrelated component. However, when I try to upload the "replacement" part to Windchill, I get the error "Assembly - asm0001.asm is not unique".  I checked the Reference Viewer in the part, and asm0001.asm is not listed. Where else can I check to break the reference? The part file is a family table, if that matters.

after installation of creo 11 student version the screen became black and no entities are highlited when drawn. My graphic card is RTX3050. windows 11

I am looking for a feature in Creo that allows you to select faces of two features and determine the relationship between them. For example, in SolidWorks, if you select two flat surfaces, it will show whether they are parallel or perpendicular in the bottom right corner or the analysis window. Similarly, if you select two circles, it will indicate if they are concentric or offset. Is there a feature in Creo that provides similar functionality or something close to it? Thank you.

Hi I'm trying to make an asynchronous app that help automate some processes.is it possible to iterate through all parts/sub assemblies in an assembly and add all components with a specific file name (test.prt for example) and add them to the selection buffer? I want the user to have the option to right click and hide/exclude/delete the selected components.   any example of how to add components to selection buffer will be appreciated. thanks