Creo+ and Creo Parametric

when a data table is created within a schematic via; generate report, and the drawing is checked in, the next time the drawing is checked out and the table is needed to revise then it is not possibble to open the table with the error "error<<<<< Unable to read table data file" despite the table being clearly visible/readable within the schematic,.  If an old version schematic is opened (ie V4) then then upon opening in schematics (V10.0.0.0) it is possible to modify once.  Bug alert!

I have been asked if we can have something on models for 3d printing that we can use as a reference to measure the the printed part to confirm it's accuracy without having to fully dimension a drawing or measure every feature. Of course the easy answer would be CMM but that is not available. So some kind of fiducial would seem to be the next thing to look at.Does anybody do this? If so How?

it seems that the function material_param() applies only for numerical parameters. You cannot access string parameters from the material with this function. Is there a method to retrieve a string parameter value from the assigned material?

Three bend cornerCreo Parametric does not have a standard workable way to work with three bend cornersThere are some workarounds, but all have issues. I work with Creo 10.0.4.0.This is my search for a good three bend corner which can be welded.How it should look after bending How the flat should look This way it is easy to weld, with the 0.1mm gap small bend mistakes do not give a problem.  Option 1Make quilt Create offset Sheetmetal conversion (no rips and bends on all edges) Surface rip + rip connect (0.1mm rip)  Unbend Chamfer Bend back Feature tree from offset and on: Pro’sNot too many steps to createThe 3d looks perfectConsDoes not work in some cases when one or more of the bends is not 90°After unbend, bend back and then unbend again (sometimes after only one unbend) the result will be this.This is not good.  Option 2Start with quilt but place a point on the line of the middle bend. This point should be at

I am using Creo Parametric Release 10.0 and Datecode10.0.1.0Importing a STEP242 model (generated from CATIA V5) and the annotation information is incorrectly positioned.It looks fine if re-imported to CATIA V5, or viewed via a 3rd-party STEP viewer, so it seems only Creo has an issue knowing how to position the annotation relative to the 3D CAD

I'm starting to play around more with Creo Flow and am a little unclear about the available options for modeling the boundary layer1) Is there an option to select a laminar boundary layer or is everything just modeled using a turbulent BL with k-eps formulation?2) Are there other turbulent BL options other than k-eps?3) does the k-eps BL option include an intelligent wall formulation, where the cells in the BL that have a y+ lower than some cutoff value are ignored?4) What are some of the levers that I can pull to achieve y+ values in the typically desired range of 13-31?Thanks!MArk  

Hi all,I have been loving the new improvements to hole modeling in Creo 10, but I am still very disappointed with the lack of polish on actually dimensioning holes. The hole notes functionality is pretty powerful, but the fact that you can't specify tolerances on those hole values makes it useless for most users in most cases (aside from just specifying tapped holes). In addition, the fact that feature control frames (GTOL) can only be placed on the notes in the elbow style is unacceptable and unprofessional. I know there is a workaround to create a free floating GTOL and then link to it in the note, but that is very clumsy. It's something I would expect from FreeCAD, not a world class CAD system. I would like to see each of the dimensional hole parameters linked to their actual annotation so the tolerance and dimension display can be adjusted, or better yet, build in the tolerance options into the hole tool. I would also like to see the ability to attach GTOL frame

Hello,Is there anywhere I can find a list of video cards that CREO supports? What would be the best configuration for CREO 9 to work?

My question is very simple. Is it possible to create a mapkey with functionality shown in uploaded Appearances.mp4 video?

Hi All,I am investigating the possibility of using creo parametric NC Milling to program a table top CNC Milling machine to machine PCB test boards that were designed in a PCB design software like KiCAD. Is this something that is being done with Creo currently? We would use this for rapid prototyping of test circuits by buying PCBs with a top copper layer and then machine away the copper between PCB connections. What would the workflow for importing the top layer and then programing the milling? Thanks! FYI, I am currently using Creo 8.0 with Advanced Professional Licensing.

Dear Team,Kindly support "How to create balloon for sub assembly component. Note:  I need to create my table Like this. 

I am trying to create a part from the solidworks model mania series. The part includes an S shaped rib feature. The feature fails to generate beyond this very narrow thickness  What am I missing?\ I am using creo parametric educational edition I have included a link to a YouTube video I uploaded showing the exact process I used to create this feature. https://youtu.be/xmp79topSuU  I'm also including a link to the model mania part drawing for referenceModel-Mania-2001-Phase-1.jpg (2120×1510) (solidworks.com) I am new to creo so any input helps 🙂

Hi,I have this message error when I try to insert constraints in "Drag Components" to create a snapshot: "You are attempting to select geometry of a rigid body without parts". I would to mate a plane with a surface.   How can I fix this problem? Best regards Michele Barile

Is it possible to use an Execute statements to drive different parameters to the same model in an assembly? I want to be able to do something like this where I can pass different values to the parts without having to duplicate the part.EXECUTE PART TEST1(5)WIDTH = WIDTHHEIGHT = HEIGHTEND EXECUTEEXECUTE PART TEST1(6)WIDTH = WIDTH + 5HEIGHT = HEIGHT + 5END EXECUTE  

Join us as we explore the future of personal aviation with Hill Helicopters, a company aiming to redefine the helicopter industry with their groundbreaking designs. Discover how they combine sleek, luxury design with cutting-edge technology to create helicopters that are not only beautiful but incredibly easy to fly.    

Hello all, I am trying to save .asm file using toolkit. I recognised the function is ProIntf3DFileWrite but what should I pass into to save .asm file. Is it PRO_INTF_EXPORT_CADDS?

How can I get the start and end point (as a pfcPoint3D_ptr) using a pfcArcDescriptor_ptr object in object toolkit c++?  

I am using Creo Parametric Release 11.0 and Datecode11.0.0.0When printing to pdf, lines and symbols become heavy. Drawings made prior print to pdf clearly. New drawings do not.

I am using Creo Parametric Release 7.0 and Datecode7.0.12.0There is a "mirrored bodies id" feature in my part. When I updated the part it was referencing the mirrored part did not get updated. How can I edit this to fix it? There is not a "edit definition" when I click on the "mirrored bodies id" feature.

Hi this is YJ I'm using the creo 11 these day. every-things is better than creo 9.but i got problem on layer tree.when i open the data i can see the layer tree every time.even if I turn it off or change min size this. it come up on my screen every time.somebody help me how to solve it. 

Join us as we learn all about KTM’s X-BOW, a sports car which contains all of the innovation and design features of a modern racing car. With its iconic jet fighter canopy, five-cylinder engine, removable steering wheel and carbon fibre monocoque.    

Our team really wants to be able to turn this text off when working in Assembly mode in Creo Parametric 3:   I have dug through Config.Pro options for hours, and I can't seem to turn this off!   Does anyone know how to remove this text display/overlay from the Assembly Window?     Thank you in advance!

We noticed that after moving from CREO 4 to CREO 9 (9.0.7.0), the behavior in the drawing when inserting symbols from the symbol palette changed.In the older version (CREO 4), when inserting a symbol from the palette, the system directly asked for a variable (if the symbol contained a variable), the user either wrote the variable or confirmed the preset value defined in the symbol.For example, when inserting the roughness symbol Ra, it could be written immediately upon insertion as, for example, 0.8 (while the preset value in my symbol is 3.2). In CREO 9, a variable cannot be written when inserting a symbol. The symbol is inserted and only then can the variable be overwritten via editing "Symbol Customization" command inside Symbol ribbon. It slows down the work terribly. Is there config option so that the symbol immediately prompts for the variable as before?? 

Is it possible to break the dependency of a mirrored part? I am wanting to mirror parts with geometry dependent initially so any changes are pushed to the mirrored part, to save time, as the majority of changes will apply to both parts. However, sometimes we need to make changes to one of the parts but not it's mirror. Can this be accomplished by undoing the "geometry dependent" setting somehow? Attached are some screenshots of the options/settings I'm seeing when creating the mirror and then when editing definition of the mirrored bodies feature.  I am using Creo 8. Thanks!-Matt

How do you get back the classic nc step/sequences? ThanksMike