Windchill

Version: Windchill 11.0 Use Case: Hi I'm following the instructions of the link below to entering FMEA Data for a functional FMEA. https://support.ptc.com/help/wrr/r12.0.1.0/en/index.html#page/wrr/GettingStartedGuide/FMEA/FMEAData.html In the 2nd step it says "In the FMEA Tree Items - Functional table, select Processing Section." I cannot find where to select "Processing Section" Could someone please guide me?Description: Entering FMEA Data: Entering FMEA DataWhere to find "Processing Section"? Here below, the FMEA Tree items - Functional is selected but cannot see where to select the "Processing Section" 

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: We have a customization in place which exports a pdf file onto a network drive when a job is published and promoted to Released state. The publish works fine and generates a pdf file, however when exporting to the shared folder we receive java.io.FileNotFoundException: \\SharedFolder\Drawings\ (Access is denied) Any help greatly appreciated.Description: We have a customization in place which exports a pdf file onto a network drive when a job is published and promoted to Released state. The publish works fine and generates a pdf file, however when exporting to the shared folder we receive java.io.FileNotFoundException: \\SharedFolder\Drawings\ (Access is denied)Any help greatly appreciated.

I am using Windchill Enterprise Systems Integration Release 11.1 and Datecode with CPS M020-CPS22StandardControlCharacteristicUsageResourceLinkIs not mapping the name of control characteristics number as the tool resource is linked with the control characteristicsHere are the errors that I facedControl Characteristic number is not getting mappes to the processing resource allocated to it in the ESI XML.

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: Is there a method to track the deletion history of effectivity in WTPart? For instance, if I have a WTPart A and initially set 'xyz' as its effectivity, but later someone deletes this effectivity and either sets a new one or leaves it empty, is there a way to identify who performed the deletion? Thank you, PravinDescription: Is there a method to track the deletion history of effectivity in WTPart? 

Version: Windchill 13.0 Hi everyone, I found a reference in the ptc support explaining that it’s possible to retrieve Primary End Items in Windchill using REST API by filtering on WCTYPE|wt.pdmlink.PDMLinkProduct as typeId and selecting productReference. However, I’m not sure what the exact endpoint is to call in order to retrieve this data.Link: https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS271349Could someone please share a concrete example of the full REST endpoint (including base path and entity name), ideally with $select or $expand usage if applicable? Thanks in advance for your help!Description: Retrieve Primary End Item via REST API

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.1 and Datecode with CPS 12.1.0.0We need a PTC Representative who is expert in SLM ( Service LifeCycle Management ).We want to explore how SLM will help us to provide standalone services and how it will work with PLM

Windchill 12.0.2.13Tried approach:1. I have a custom workflow in which, through an expression, I obtain the attribute(of primary business object) that holds user value. For this user, the reporting manager(type: WTUser) is retrieved from the AD. 2. A workflow variable 'supervisor' of type WTUser is created and the WTUser value obtained in step-1 is assigned.3. In the workflow activity(Participants tab --> Variables section), the 'supervisor' variable is defined as 'Assignee'. Expectation: Task, if generated successfully, should be assigned to the 'supervisor' user. However, on the task page, the variable appears as a dropdown and the task is assigned to the admin. Workflow expression robot to assign Supervisor value:try {wt.doc.WTDocument doc = (wt.doc.WTDocument) primaryBusinessObject;ext.tools.iba.IBAUtility flsIBinst = new ext.tools.iba.IBAUtility ();String attUserValue = (String)flsIBinst .getAttributeValue(doc,"flsUserId");ext.util.ADUtil ADUtilinst = new ex

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.1.1  The data of the CAD document from SolidWorks is normal, and the data after checking in Windchill is also normal. There is a problem with the visualization position in the structure tab. Is there any good solution?Email: 17674619511@136.com----------------------------------------------------Translated the text from Simplified Chinese to English using Google translateBody - CAD文档从SolidWorks程序中的数据正常，检入windchill之后的数据也是正常的，在结构标签页中的可视化的位置出现问题，有什么好的解决办法吗 邮箱：17674619511@136.com-By Community Moderation Team----------------------------------------------------

Hi, we are having a problem with our Promotion Request workflow. Sometimes we come across a situation where at first only WTParts are added to a Promotion Request as Promotion Objects:  We use "Pending Approval" state to lock objects that are added to Promotion Requests so that they are not edited during the review process (because the promotion process seems to be unable to refresh the latest iteration automatically to the PR). At this point the WTPart is moved to that state. Then when the Promotion Request is later edited and the related CAD documents are added to Promotion Objects, the WTParts drop out of the Promotion Objects because they are in the "Pending Approval" state, which we are not allowing to be promoted:   Now at this point the WTPart gets stuck to "Pending Approval" state even though it is not in the Promotion Request anymore:  And someone with Admin or Product Manager access needs to now go and use Set State to change

Hello, I have the below list of requirements for which I am considering to make use of Part Request object.i)  A workflow process is required where different tasks for the teams are triggered.ii) Different teams edit the Part Request and enrich the part informationiii)Teams should only be able to edit/update fields corresponding to them. Example: Mechanical team when trying to edit the Part Request, should only be able to enter values for attributes corresponding to Mechanical Department.ii)Parts should not be created in the system until the enrichment by different teams are completed But in Part Request I see limitations with layouts as it cannot be customized. As an alternative way, I am planning to add new actions under Part Request Actions tab where different teams will see an Edit-like option to enter the attributes corresponding to them. I was hoping to get a new perspective on this and how one shall go about the implementation of a custom wizard with specific

Hi Everyone, I used the wcadmin user to try to delete below this, but I don't have permission on how and where we can find and clear this. Regards, AJ  

ThingWorx Navigate is now officially branded as "Windchill Navigate", signifying a rebranding effort to align more closely with the Windchill PLM ecosystem. New branding: The product is now consistently referred to as "Windchill Navigate" in all internal / external user interface elements and systems.  Version update: This branding change will be visible in ThingWorx Navigate version 9.7.0 and beyond.  Alignment with Windchill: The rebranding reflects a closer integration with the Windchill PLM platform.    Useful Links: Windchill Navigate Help Centers PTC Software Download - Windchill Navigate (Formerly ThingWorx Navigate) Windchill Navigate 9.7.0.0 (9.7.0) Release Matrix - PTC Release Advisor

Hello,In Windchill on a file page, if the number of general attributes set to show exceeds the General Attributes section the display box resorts to scrolling rather than expanding the box.  Is there an easy settings change or way to make this such that all the attributes are visible and perhaps the box is expanded, the distance between lines is lessened, or the font size is decreased, rather than resorting to scrolling?  A single extra attribute was determined to be important and added to the list of visible attributes in that section but no one bothered to check if it would have any consequences anywhere else.  Now one of the most important attributes and one that I look at 50+ times a day for different objects ) is hidden away.I apologize if this is not the correct section for this or if this is a silly question.  I'm not a Windchill admin or expert and am new to this forum.  I'm just someone annoyed by the behavior of the system (or our system) and hoping t

While exporting the bulk documents list into XLSX or XLS the items in the list should have hyperlink either in Document number or in name.The purpose of the hyper link is, it will be helpful for the users to redirect them directly to the document page in the windchill.For now in our windchill we are having hyperlink on the name after clicking on the name it will redirect us to the information page of the particular document, but if I export the list to the excel(XLSX) then the hyper link is getting missed So we would like to have the hyperlink on the number or name after exporting the documents list into XLSX file.  

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: Build Associated Parts for Image/Content links.Description: After a "successful" ERP migration was done to build WTParts, some of our CAD was linked to multiple ERP material masters that already had owners. CREO is our future and wanting to make those links Owner. Inventor is second priority while Solidworks is third. How can we make it so the Build Associated Part/Compare CAD to Part Structure tool works for all three cad package assemblies with a single WTPart? We thought the Image association type was the answer but PTC claims "a single CAD document cannot be associated to multiple WC parts using this type.", and we have a lot of CAD in this scenario. Is it best practice to have a one-to-one CAD package type to WTPart? Or do we need to clean up our ERP system?

Version: Windchill 12.0 Use Case: Why Attribute selector values in Advance search criteria differ from user to userDescription: I noticed Attribute selector values in Advance search criteria are different for users. How it is controlled. Refer attached image

I have a scenario where there is an attribute (say Sample String1)which has a pair of json values("bat:MRF, ball:stumper, team:csk") Now I will have to display these values as "Attribute-value" pair in a custom Tab which I have created. Note: These Json values are received from another third party tool, we need to display these as attribute value pair in the custom Tab. Need guidance and help on how to achieve this.

windchill版本是12，如何在团队中批量配置角色和组的对应关系windchill版本是12，如何在团队中批量配置角色和组的对应关系windchill版本是12，如何在团队中批量配置角色和组的对应关系

Hi Guys,Can we change the association type bulk in Windchill? Regards,Aj 

Hi Guys,I want to know how to use the Thumbnail CAD worker in Windchill. Where can we use this, and can it be added to the document worker? Regards,Aj

Hi Guys,Can we move bulkly from one context to another context through the database?Regards,Aj

Version: Windchill Below 11.0 Use Case: We accidentally moved a lot of files and we are wanting to move them all back to there original location.Description: Is there way to find the original location of all these files at once?

I am looking at using calculated attributes on Parts. In the past, I remember an issue where they would not send properly downstream to SAP. Has anyone else every had any issues while using Calculated Attributes? I want to make sure there isn't something I am forgetting from past implementations.

Version: Windchill 12.0 Use Case: Every mail being set out from any user gets the following message in the queue entries Invalid substitution syntax, "[" missing, near line 107 of /windchill_home/Windchill/tasks/wt/mailSendMail.xml I have checked with Notepad ++ and cant find any miss matched brackets. This file has not been edited and is the original from the install. Is this a known bug?Description: Every mail being set out from any user gets the following message in the queue entries Invalid substitution syntax, "[" missing, near line 107 of /windchill_home/Windchill/tasks/wt/mailSendMail.xml I have checked with Notepad ++ and cant find any miss matched brackets. This file has not been edited and is the original from the install.Is this a known bug?

When a supplier provides a STEP file, should the CAD be attached to the OEM part or the supplier part?