Windchill

Hi, UG Worker a assembly PDF have dashed line after drawing Save As but NX haven't. Worker Log; "ug2pv Error:59030: Number of component parts with error status on open = 2....ug2pv Warning: Child lost connecting to Parent." File sync is off in wvs.properties. Why it can be this? What is the solution?Thank you in adv 

Version: Windchill 12.0.2.18 Hi, We are looking to create a Managed Baseline in our promotion request workflow for all mechanical assembly with the name  *-01-g.asm I have found the Article - CS371627 - How to create a baseline in a (promotion request) workflow? and the Article - CS25967 - How to programmatically create a managed baseline in Windchill PDMLink which give some ideas, but I am having some difficulty going deeper into the development. The small step I have already succeed is the following : Add an "Execute Expression" robot after the "Set State Approved" method Robot and the Notify By E-mail robot :The code to execute to the expression call a custom class :  ext.sce.workflow.CreateBaseline.createBaseline(baselineName);   The content of the class is the following :  package ext.sce.workflow; import wt.vc.baseline.ManagedBaseline; import wt.util.WTException; import wt.util.WTPropertyVetoException; import wt.fc

Version: Windchill 12.0 Use Case: Can we print parent part details to a jsp page using end item in windchill through customization for a bom report.Description: Can we print parent part details to a jsp page using end item in windchill through customization

I have found that Derived Image Table stores the information of MOOD.I have written a listener on Update Event checking on Derived Image Object.The Listener works perfectly, But even the object is MOOD the derivedImage.isOutOfDate() returns false.Is there any other specific event to check on MOOD or Am i missing something?

There are two departments (engineering and operations) and engineering departement is responsible for creating the eBOM. The windchill part will be released and given a specific state.The operations side of the company then needs to create a downstream branch in order to split up the eBOM and make an mBOM. It looks like that in order to be able to create downbstream branches, the user needs to have 'Modify'-rights on the upstream WT-part, but I don't want everyone who must be able to create downstream branches (operations department) to be allowed to modify the upstream parts (responsibility of the engineering department). Am I overlooking some settings or is this just default behaviour and should I tell operations to be carefull with upstream 'design' parts?

Hi All, As you are aware that in 12.0.1.0, Windchill DS is removed from the technology stack and only user information is stored in Active Directory or LDAP v3 compliant LDAP Server PTC didn't give any preparation document for LDAP v3 compliant LDAP Server for Windchill   If any one of you tried, Please let me know your experience   I would like to know whether you have to do any configuration once you install the LDAP server before you install windchill   Best Regards Prajeesh Kumar

Currently we have a internal debate and we are looking for some lessons learned / best practices regarding implementing Maturity states on WT Parts. Currently we have more or less the default Lifecycle states for "all" objects (Parts, Documents, etc):In Work - Released - Obsolete - Under review We would like to introduce Maturity States for our WT Parts and we have vision on 2 options:Introduce Maturity as a global attribute on WT.Part. (Simple to implement, but lacking some control mechanisms)Implement a lifecycle for Part which reflect the maturity states. But keep the existing lifecycle on the other objects. (More complex to implement but seems to be more in line with Windchill designed usage)Is there anybody that would like to share some experience with this issue? Lessons learned from a similar implementation? Pros/Cons? Maybe other options? Should lifecycle states be used to reflect maturity states at all? Some reference documentation? Would it be best to keep the lifec

What is the difference between multifidelityderivedimage and derivedimage tables in DB?

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.0.4  There is no out-of-date prompt for the target component and drawing in the workspace, but an out-of-date prompt appears after opening the drawing--------------------------------------------------------------------Translated text from Simplified Chinese to English using google translateSubject - 在工作区的状态图标不起作用了Body - 在工作区内目标组件和图纸没有出现过时提示，但是打开图纸后出现过时提示- By Community Moderation Team--------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi, I just added a new property called "price" to WTPart. I want to know that, when adding children to a parent WTPart, are there ways to calculate and update the total price of a parent WTPart automatically, by adding the prices of its children WTPart together?  For example, A is the final product, B ($5) and C ($10) are children of A. First I create A, leave the price blank. Then I add C to A as a child, I would like to see the "price" property of A automatically updated to $10. Then add B to A as a child, the price of A is updated to $15. I'm using Windchill 12.1, just wondering if it's possible. I'm new to customization of windchill but have some experiences in Java programming, so if yes, could you please also tell me what are the steps I should do?  Thank you!

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: Need to create a preference which only accepts a number as inputDescription: I can create string, type or boolean preferences using a loadfile with the right handler, but I cant find any example handler for Integer, does it exist? e.g. Booleancom.ptc.windchill.enterprise.preference.handler.BooleanPreferenceValueHandler:e.g. Stringcom.ptc.windchill.enterprise.preference.handler.StringPreferenceValueHandler:400:400e.g. Type Pickercom.ptc.windchill.enterprise.search.preference.handler.TypePreferenceValueHandler:/com/ptc/windchill/enterprise/search/allSearchTypese.g. Integer??? where do you find it? e.g. Preference loadfile  <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE NmLoader SYSTEM "standardX10.dtd"> <NmLoader> <!-- Clean up first--> <csvUnlinkPreferenceClientDefinition handler="wt.preference.LoadPreference.deleteClientDefinitionLink"> <csvname>/ext/ws/elecReportDocumentType</csvname> <cs

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: Options & VariantsDescription: In Option Pool i want to create a New Option but getting a persistance error as soon the New Option has been given a name, is that SQL DB related?? Regards

Version: Windchill 12.0 Use Case: I encountered an error message while executing xconfmanager - p in Windchill shell： ERROR [main] com.ptc.windchill.structconf.StructConfManager - Unexpected error (stack trace below):Description: I encountered an error message while executing xconfmanager - p in Windchill shell：ERROR [main] com.ptc.windchill.structconf.StructConfManager - Unexpected error (stack trace below):The attachment contains my specific error message 

Hi, We are looking to integrate Windchill PLM system (11.2) to SAP S/4 (HaNa). Our goal is transfer real time data (BOM,ECN and parts) to SAP system .We are looking at options on what are the best options here. Request you to share your experience or feedback on the subject matter .

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: I'd like to add a link to our internal support portal on this pageDescription:

Hi expert,I am working on the updating the WC 13.0.0.0 to WC 13.0.2.0 I have below few questions-1.Instead of MOR WC 13.0.2.0 Can I directly go for the WC 13.0.2.1 Critical release? is this possible?Or we need to install first MOR 13.0.2.0 first and then install critical release Patch WC 13.0.2.1?2. Can we keep old CD images and new images at same staging location? what's the best practice followed in industry?   

Version: Windchill 12.0 Use Case: We use NX and Windchill... so yes, a bit of a long shot but relevant to Windchill references functionality 🙂 I'm working on rolling out several features and one of interest here has to do with drawing notes. Specifically, I'm interested in Material call out drawing notes. There's an article in the Siemens support pages on how to create and store standard drafting notes in the Reuse library that can dragged and dropped onto a drawing. These notes are saved as NX .prt files and can be associated to a WTPart - in my case a Material part subtype I intend to use downstream in the mBOM. However, the note itself when added to NX is not a part part but instead a drafting feature so once added there's no association between it and the model it's added to.Description: This Siemens article goes over how to create standard drafting notes and save them in the Reuse library within NX. I went through these steps from PTCs documentation on setting up a

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: our company PTC client version is 13.2 and our family company PTC client version is 12.4. and we need to move some requirement documents from this 12.4 version server to 13.2 version server by using IRC(Integrity Requirement Connector = currently WRC) tool. our company IRC tool version is 4.2.Description: 1) we want to know if we can move requirement documents from 12.4 version PTC server to 13.2 version PTC server by using 4.2 version IRC tool considering compatibility perspective and esle. 2) if upper answer is 'impossible', then, is there another way for us to move those requirement documents from 12.4 version PTC server to 13.2 version PTC server ?thanks for support.

Version: Windchill Below 11.0 Use Case: The goal is to generate the model automatically with VBS API based on the text input, The model contains many Full ports, which are generated automatically. (Done) Every full port shall be connected to the same FlowPort with Dependency (Abstraction). Can you please give a hint how to do it?Description: How to generate the dependency (abstraction) from the flow port to the full port?After this the stereotype shall be applied to the Abstraction.

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 11.2 and Datecode with CPS 11.2.1.16  Add a file to the product library. When the file is added to the archive, "Rule argument 3 is null. Please confirm that the passed argument is not null and then try again."-------------------------------------------------------------------Translated the topic from Traditional Chinese to English using google translateSubject - 存檔錯誤訊息排解請求Body - 至產品庫新增文件，新增完至存檔階段出現"規則引數3為空值，請先確認傳遞的引數不是空值，然後再試一次"- By Community Moderation Team.-------------------------------------------------------------------

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.0.1   In windchill, for the "security label" of the document object, it is assumed that the security label set for the document is "core" (core, normal, core security level is higher than normal), but the user is not in the core group of the corresponding "security label". This object cannot be viewed.How to configure it so that all users can only view but not download documents and other objects that have the security label "Core" set?Currently, users have permission control over folders, but some documents in the folder have a higher security level (core), and only core personnel are allowed to view and download them. Ordinary personnel also need to view core files, and after viewing them, they will be reviewed based on the actual situation. Request download attachment.    Here are the errors that I facednone   Translated by the Community Moderation using Google Translate windchill中，对于文档对象的“安全标签”

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: Hi All, Currently I doing in upgrade from Windchill 11 M030 to Windchill 12.1.2.Description: The question  : Should I migrate data WindchillDS from source system (Windchill 11.0 M030) to target system (Windchill 12.1.2) as upgrade prosess? before OR after upgrade ? how to migrate it?What's step if I will to continue with WindchillDS? either or OpenDJ? Any suggestions for this step? Thank you so much !regards==deddy==

how to find the issue of wt.manager.CacheMasterNegotiator - Reverting master to slave. ?2024-09-26 08:24:43,204 INFO [JMX client heartbeat 17093] wt.system.err - ???????? 26, 2024 8:24:43 ???????? ClientCommunicatorAdmin Checker-run2024-09-26 08:24:43,204 INFO [JMX client heartbeat 17093] wt.system.err - ????????: Failed to check the connection: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out

I am creating and testing simple functions using EXCEL VBA.I am testing the function with WRS before coding EXCEL VBA. WRS > PTC Product Management Domain V6 > Testing POST /CreateParts results in an error Where the error occurs "Context@odata.bind": "Containers('OR:wt.pdmlink.PDMLinkProduct:131308')",  erro code : 400 - MALFORMED_BINDING_LINK - "The format of 'binding link' is incorrect." Many users have asked about the above issue in Google search results, and I have tested it several times by referring to the answers. 1. I tested it by referring to the PTC manual, but an error occurred.,  - MALFORMED_BINDING_LINK     **** Request Body       {"Name":"TestWTPart_001","AssemblyMode": {"Value": "separable","Display": "Separable"    }, "PhantomManufacturingPart" : false,"Context@odata.bind": "Containers('OR:wt.pdmlink.PDMLinkProduct:48507000')"      } 2. I also de

Dear Windchill+ Read-E users, PTC has worked on some improvements to ease the upload process of WReadE (Windchill+ Readiness and Diagnostic Extension) output package that we want to share: Windchill+ Readiness Data Upload Portal-This automated service provides the ability to send the output package generated by Windchill+ Readiness and Diagnostic Extension (WReadE) to PTC.The Offline portal was implemented for a secure and trustworthy data collectionThe following enhancements are live now:Any user with valid PTC account from an organization can upload WReadE package specifying a Userid. The person that executes the WReadE tool doesn't have to be the one that uploads the package to the portal anymorePTC users can upload a WReadE package on behalf of a customer. This can be useful in case of any challenges with the upload portal.The ‘Most Recent Scans’ table has additional information - ‘PACKAGE CREATED BY’ and ‘UPLOADED BY’ columns.​Please remember – Enabling WPA sha