CAD

I am using Creo Elements/Direct Modeling Release 20.4 and Datecode20.4.3.0 CEDM session does not recover license if started in Zscaler and switch network to an enterprise on site wifi. It is Zscaler related, because in the past we had other VPN and it was allowed to start in VPN and switch to company wifi. In both cases there is connectiviy to the license server, just doesn´t recover the session. The session must be closed and reopen. Here are the errors that I faced Typical error when a license is granted and then temporarily lost connectivity to license server: "the license server connection to these hosts is broken xxxxxx" + "the following licenses have been withdrawn and are currently unavailable".

I try to activate trial license, it says that it is activated, but next startup, it opens the browser again and the disclaimer on the sheet is still present. The button Activate is still present. How can we test the full version without license prompts?The convertor MCD to MCDX also mentioned, no license  

I am using Creo Parametric Release 7.0 and Datecode7.0.7.0 I am attempting to automate the Fix Indexing process in a Creo drawing for multiple components within an assembly by assigning RPT_INDEX values through relations at the assembly level. The goal is to update the BOM item numbering and sequence automatically in a single operation. for Here are the errors that I faced after assigning and verifying the relations, the BOM table does not rearrange according to the specified RPT_INDEX sequence upon regeneration. Additionally, the RPT_INDEX values are not consistently reflected against the intended part numbers, resulting in incorrect item sequencing within the BOM. We would like to understand whether this behavior is due to a Creo limitation, configuration requirement, or software issue, and seek guidance on achieving fully automated Fix Indexing through relations.

Hello,We received from customer Bend table in format which SolidWorks read well, so we are trying to apply that in Creo (Creo 11.0.3), but as we noticed Creo has a little bit different format. It has radius and thickness and values inside are bend allowance if i understood correctly, and the table from SW have thickness, radius , bend angle (which is not affecting k-factor if u see table, so it can be ignored), and k factor as value derived (0.618, 0.619, 0.693....). Does anyone know how that should be applied in Creo and have maybe some examples, or is bend table a right way in Creo to apply this.

I am trying to re-install my MathCad 14 software on a new workstation, but keep getting a server error message. Can you please help. I did see where it was solved a few years ago for someone else.

I have an assembly with 5 different components and I'm planning to create 7 different instances. 4 of the 5 components will always be painted the same color, but the 5th component needs to be a different color (color-coded for each of the 7 instances). When I assign that component a color in the generic assembly, the same color propogates to each of the 7 assembly instances. Anybody know how to overcome this problem?

I have extensively used equation curves based on the sine curve formula in the work I do.  I would like to be able to vary this to where the upswing of each wave is tighter than the downswing.  The wave itself would retain the same height on the upswing and downswing only the radius values would change.Below is a mock up of what I am hoping to be able to do.  Also, I would like to be able to repeat this pattern.  I am hoping that this would be possible. 

My company recently transitioned from Creo 10 to 13 (version 13.4.1.0), and one of the features I used regularly is no longer available, as far as I know.  I have been using the scroll wheel to change between items on drop-down menus - e.g., tolerances in drawings, joint statuses and definitions in welds, file type in the Save As window, and probably more - and it appears that that function no longer exists in Creo 13.  It was very convenient to my workflow, and I hope that this functionality can be restored in a future patch, or support personnel can direct me to a config option to fix this if it already exists.  Thank you

Hi, I am trying to solve an ODE to model a “Ball and Cone” tuned mass damper. The equations simulate a ball mounted inside a pair of cones with mass on top. The ball oscillates up and down an inclined slope with a curved region at the apex between the up/down slopes. I am using Radau solver as it is a stiff equation. Adams/BDF “does not converge”. The 1st solve block uses a simplified simulation for base excitation of the TMD. Using Radau with modest levels of damping the first solve block result gives a discontinuous response which should not happen given the inclined slope is a tangent to the curved section at the apex. Any ideas how I can correct this discontinuity would be appreciated.I tried using sigmoid transition functions (2nd solve block) for the step between inclined slope and radius but this gives a large number error.The 3rd solve block includes an extra degree of freedom to simulate the tower on which the damper is mounted, which is the aim of the program. This won’t solv

一个组件生成的BOM表，但是有些部件不希望在BOM中看到，就使用了简化表示，现在只有在3D装配图形中看不到零件了，但是生成的BOM中还是存在不希望看到的零件，我应该如何设置才能达到想要的效果，感谢

Chapter 9: Wind and Seismic Loads on Buildings, Part 2            Description:          This application computes the seismic forces, shears, and overturning moments at each level of a building, following the Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure of Section 9.4 of ASCE Standard 7-93. The building must meet the limitations for use of this procedure given in section 9.3.5 of ASCE Standard 7-93. Previous: Chapter 9, Part 1Next: Chapter 9, Part 3

I am using Mathcad Release 15.0 and DatecodeM005 Invalid host I'm trying to move my old mathcad 15.0 license to my home computer. I get Flexnet licensing error -9,57. I've tried generating licenses with both the ethernet mac and the wifi mac. I tried putting the laptop on ethernet and verifying that port was active with the matching license file. Here are the errors that I faced Invalid Host... Feature: Mathcad Hostid: PTC_Hostid=40:c2:ba:fe:42:7b (this is the ethernet mac) Flexnet error:-9,57 etc.

HeyI have a Mould that has 3 BodiesWhen I make a drawing I want to show only one of each bodies. My goal is in the 1st sheet I will show the views of  top part of the mouldin the 2nd sheet I will show the views of middle part of the mouldin the 3rd sheet I will show the views bottom part of the mouldand in the 4th sheet I will show 1 view top part and another view middle part and so on.. each sheet will have top view, bottom view and side views of the body  Please let me know how I can do it

HiI am on Creo 10.0.1.0While features such as Holes, Rounds, Chamfers etc can be grouped using query in Layers, wondering if the same can be done in the “Design Tree”.Filtering the design tree and dragging and dropping the features into the custom group is a manual process which we would like to avoid. The reason being, every time a new feature such as a round is added, it would not become a part of the custom group, without a manual intervention.Help documentation is silent on this aspect.I am aware that this can be done through layers.Thanks in advance.

I am using Creo Elements/Direct Modeling Release N/A and DatecodeN/A I have completed the account registration process. However, when I access Manage Licenses from eSupport, I receive the following error message and cannot proceed with the installation. "Access Denied. You do not have the required permissions. Your web account does not have the following permissions required to access this application: License Management Reporting (read-only access) License Management License As a result, I am unable to continue with the installation process. Could you please advise on how to obtain the necessary permissions or resolve this issue? Here are the errors that I faced アクセスが拒否されました。権限がありません。 お客様の Web アカウントは当該アプリケーションにアクセスするために必要とされる次の権限がありません。 • License Management Reporting for read-only access. • ライセンス管理ライセンス

When a PCB needs to carry significantly higher current, simply increasing the trace width is not always enough. There are several factors that need to be considered during the PCB design stage to make sure the board can handle the electrical and thermal requirements.Copper thickness is one of the first things I would evaluate. A high-current design may require thicker copper depending on the expected current and allowable temperature rise. Trace width, copper pours, and the overall current path are also important because resistance in the PCB can result in voltage drop and heat generation.Thermal management is another consideration. Components such as MOSFETs, regulators, connectors, and power devices can generate significant heat, so the PCB layout needs to provide suitable copper area and thermal paths. Vias can also be useful for transferring heat and connecting copper between layers.The return-current path is just as important as the power path. Poorly planned ground connections ca

i have problem executing smartcolor in creo could someone send a url of an explicative vedio

i purchased the Mathcad license. but in my new laptop the license is not working. could you please help me. thank you

I am using Creo Schematics Release 7.0 and Datecode7.0.0.0 I'm getting 'Warning - license for Creo Schematics expires in 1 days' message even though my licenses are expiring on 10-may-2027. Here are the errors that I faced I'm getting 'Warning - license for Creo Schematics expires in 1 days' message even though my licenses are expiring on 10-may-2027.

I am creating a 2D illustration from a 3D model in Creo Illustrate 10.1, but I am not satisfied with the result.Most of the lines are smooth and clean, but some appear straight, making curved lines look “jagged”—even though the surfaces are smoothly contoured.To get the desired result, I usually remove all the "jagged" lines manually. Is there any way to prevent this? I have tried various settings for 2D figures, but nothing helps. See the attached image. The red arrows point to the "jagged" lines.  

N/M

I’ve kinda got a situation here… Consider I have two diffrent teams working in my office. One team is sitting at a different country & the other is sitting at India. Now, both of them are working on a same rocket assembly & the parameters & relations which both the teams are using are different only in terms of names. The result/output of the parameters that are needed are same. Now, if I want to bring them together, where CREO has to identify that 2 differently named parameters are the same & it has to consider a master parameter based upon the 2 named parameters…Is there any way to do this???

Hello all.I need to create a heilcal gear for my project.I’ve tried a few on Youtube but cant get them to work.Does anyone know of a good guide to follow...or even on online generator where i can input my data and download a stp file?I found one online generator but it wont accept my data - out of range.I’m on Creo 11.Thanks

Hi,Does anyone have experience with ‘Leo AI’ in the Creo Parametric-Windchill environment?Thank you

Current Behavior of CreoIn Multi-Body models, Creo regenerates all features following a modified feature in the model tree, regardless of whether these features are actually affected by the change.The regeneration process primarily follows the sequential order of the model tree rather than the actual geometric and parametric dependencies between features.As a result, features that have no direct or indirect relationship to the modified feature are regenerated unnecessarily.This behavior affects both:Features within the same body Features belonging to other independent bodies within the modelProblem / EffortIn large and complex models, this behavior can lead to significant regeneration times, even when only a small local modification is made.A change to a single feature can cause hundreds or even thousands of subsequent features to be recalculated, despite the absence of any actual dependency.This results in:Long waiting times during design work Reduced engineering productivity Slower d