Creo+ and Creo Parametric

1. Describe your environment: What is your industry? What is your role in your organization? Describe your stakeholders.Transportation Design. Mechanical EngineerStakeholders:  All Creo (ProE) users who model.2. What version of Creo Parametric are you currently running?Creo 8.03. Describe the problem you are trying to solve. Please include detailed documentation such as screenshots, images or video.Sketcher Conflict Resolution.4. What is the use case for your organization? Modelling anything with sketch-based features5. What business value would your suggestion represent for your organization?Efficiency and time-saving in the design process. ================================================================Quite often, sketcher doesn't take into account all the correct dimensions and constraints that effect the conflict when a sketch element (line, arc or point) is over-constrained by too many constraints or dimensions. I know this, because I can delete a dimensi

I am using Creo Parametric - Release 3.0 (connected) Release 3.0 and DatecodeM120I have a user using Creo 3 on a laptop with a docking station and external monitors. He was having an issue where parts and assemblies were opening extremely slow. I recalled a similar issue and it related to the external monitor. If Creo opened on the external monitor, it ran really slowly. If it opened on the laptop display, it opened the part or assembly much faster. It seemed to relate to the video adapter that Creo was trying to use, either the onboard intel one or the nvidia video card. The user is now claiming that things are opening slowly anytime he opens Creo when docked. Do you know of any workaround or best practice in this scenario?

Hi,If I add a geometric tolerance to a drawing dimension, the program proposes it to me as follows:I don't like the dimension line hooking to the tolerance instead of the drawing dimension value.I would prefer the dimension line to snap to the drawing dimension value, as shown in the following image edited by me with "Paint".Is it possible to obtain this result? Can you tell me how?Thank you all.P.S. I use Creo 9.0.0.0 

Hi, I have an assembly and i need to add pattern with conditional statement if the condition yes and i need to keep one feature if the condition no, I tried to make pattern with relations but it is working when the number of pattern two and more my problem is sometimes i need the number to be one which is not doable by pattern, any thoughts about ??

I am using Creo Parametric - Release 6.0 (connected) Release 6.0 and Datecode6.0.3.0Hello,i have a one question. We have a customer Stakotra Manufacturing (customer number: 134130) and they have a problem with assemblies with fatal error. When he open the main assembly, then he open part, he check the mass properties in the model, doesnt change anything. Then he close the part and see main assemby, Creo regenerate assembly and then Creo fall down. I have a traceback.log (in attachement). Do you can check the file? I am was try relative and absolut accuracy, mass_properties_calculate as automatic or by request, but the reasult was the same.Thank youHere are the errors that I facedtraceback.log

I am using Creo Parametric Release 6.0 and Datecode6.0.3.0Creo 6 crashes due to config options after upgrading from creo 3

Hi, i am having problem with displaying my part in BOM table. I can only see parts or assemblies, that are downloaded from FESTO website. Can anybody please help me? thank you :))

Hello community,Currently, I use tools such as GerbView or Viewmate to import and review multilayer PCB gerbers.  I can load as many layers as I want, turn them on/off and set up various viewing filters. I use CreoView with the ECAD additions for other things, like reviewing board design data.  It would be cool to reduce the number of tools I need for circuit board reviews.I've tried to bring gerbers into CreoView, and it works but does not overlay them all like the Viewmate tool.  I'm fairly new to CreoView, so I'm guessing there's a way to load them all into the same viewer and manage layers accordingly, but so far I can only get two layers to overlay at one time.  Not extremely helpful to see the big picture. What am I missing here?  I've hunted around PTC's help and the website for guidance, but thus far have only found information for comparing two layers or loading a layer at a time for review. Anyone have guidance on using CreoView ECAD in the same manne

Hello all, I am trying to register the server, create dummy workspace, checkout model and open the model in creo. I am able to checkout the objects and retrieve in Creo using below code.  // here is necessary declaration status = ProMdlnameRetrieve(lclmdlName, (ProMdlfileType)mdlType, &retrieveModal); if (status == PRO_TK_NO_ERROR) { Logger::LogInfo("Model retrieved successfully"); } /* Display the object */ status = ProObjectwindowMdlnameCreate(lclmdlName, (ProType)mdlType, &w_id); status = ProWindowCurrentSet(w_id); status = ProMdlDisplay(retrieveModal); status = ProMdlWindowGet(retrieveModal,&w_id); status = ProWindowCurrentSet(w_id); status = ProWindowActivate(w_id);  After this code, some where in my code when I use "ProMdlCurrentGet" -> it doen't give me Promdl handle. Am I doing wrong thing? Thanks for the help in advance.Harsh Patel

Hello dear members, I am trying to save my assembly as part and for that I am using Shrinkwrap from 'Save a copy' command. I also want datum planes to be present in Shrinkwrap part. For that I am using Datum reference in shrinkwrap dialogue. But when I open the Shrinkwrap part  the datum planes are appearing as Copy geometry feature and I cant utlize that plane for further design such as Sketching on that plane or creating another plane with reference to that. Any help on that? 

Hello, I switched back to CREO recently and use a command in Solidworks called "Intersection Curve" inside the Solidworks sketcher.  If you are sketching on a plane that goes through a solid you can pick the surface and it will create a line where the sketching plane intersects that solid.  Is there an equivalent method of doing this in CREO besides using an intersection curve outside of the sketch command in CREO?

Hi All,I would like to know if it is possible for users to use downgraded versions of software in the current subscription licensing model or is it something that PTC restricts somehow? 

When the stress-strain response of the material is defined as "Linear"; under what conditions one must activate the "plasticity" for the simulation. Static simulations with linear material responses are considered "small deformation" theory.If plasticity or large deformation does not exist when using linear material responses, why not black out this function. 

Hi , The dimension from pattern feature is not shown in correct place between 3D annotation and drawing.The dimension is created in the first instance of pattern and shown correctly in 3D annotation. But it is shown in another instance of pattern in 2D drawing, not the same place as created.Please check the picture and model & drawing for detailed information.

As per this thread - question related:   Hello, Not the same, but I am experiencing issue with Event manager like, Event manager showing retry options for conflict in standalone Windchill application and at the same time "From CREO the story is different, I don't have any retry options for a same conflict."    BR, Ganesh

I have creo parametric 7.0.

I am using Creo Parametric - Release 3.0 (connected) Release 3.0 and DatecodeM190we have issue on flattening some cables

Hi All, I am currently trying to use the cabling function in Creo 8 and have ran into an issue when trying to create a sheath/bundle. When I switch from the thick cables display to the centreline display I am unable to have the wires display. Any advice for making these appear would be appreciated.

Hello. I am using Pro/TOOLKIT in a Windows executable application to analyze the current CAD file opened in a Creo 8.0.2.0 session.Here there is a skeleton of the used functions. ProEngineerConnect() ;ProMdlCurrentGet() ;if (ProMdlCombstatesGet(ProSolid(Model), &arCombinedStates) == PRO_TK_NO_ERROR &&ProArraySizeGet(arCombinedStates, &iNumberOfCombinedStates) == PRO_TK_NO_ERROR){for (int iCombinedState = 0; iCombinedState < iNumberOfCombinedStates; iCombinedState++){AnalyzeCombinedState(Model, arCombinedStates[iCombinedState]);}} void AnalyzeCombinedState(const ProMdl Model, ProCombstate CombinedState){if (ProCombstateDataGet(&CombinedState, sName, &arItems, &iCrossSectionClipOption, &bExploded) == PRO_TK_NO_ERROR &&ProArraySizeGet(arItems, &iNumberOfItems) == PRO_TK_NO_ERROR)for (int iItem = 0; iItem < iNumberOfItems; iItem++)switch (arItems[iItem].type){case PRO_VIEW:ProView View;ProMatrix Matrix;if (ProV

I am creating multiple drawing for a variety of  assemblies. They are pretty much identical other than one or two components.Is there a possibility of creating a standard template or format for the BOM table Balloons? So all of my drawings will look identical? 

Fatal error encountered.A trackback had been written to C:\Users\Public\Documents\traceback.log please send it to Technical Support

I am using Creo Parametric Release 4.0 and DatecodeM060Creo response is too slow after launching. After a minute, the xtop process has to be killed since Creo stops responding.The client machine & the license server are on two different networks but have an IPSEC tunnel to establish connect with each other.In the Std.out file, I see the below entry repeated multiple times.Connection restored with License Server (#)

I am using Creo Parametric Release 6.0 and Datecode6.0.6.0Hello, I have a problem with the display of faces when I create a 2D drawing from the 3D file     Translated with Google Translate by Iuliana Nuta, 24 june 2022.

Creo 5.0 parametric opens to the message below: License request failed for feature  Requesting CREOPMA_SchoolsSTD6 ...C:\ProgramData\PTC\Licensing\BE700908EDSTUDENTK12_license.dat:(-21) License file does not support this version. Run prcstatus.bat for server status I used the code given on the instructions.  Any help resolving this issue would be greatly appreciated. 

Hello,During CAM tests on Creo NC version 9.0, I noticed that when creating a face milling operation, there is no Check Surfaces option to add elements and avoid collisions. This function is available in some operations (Drilling, Tapping, Roud, Chamfer, ...) but not in the major functions such as face milling.Currently the generated toolpaths can cause collisions. Is it possible to generate a collision check for surfacing operations? It would be interesting to create toolpaths that take into account the environment (clamping, part, stock, machine). Thank you and best regards.