Manufacturing (CAM)

I am using Creo Parametric Release 8.0 and Datecode8.0.6.0Hello,when I only output Tapping sequnce's Gpost I want add the code M29 instead of M3 code.How can I do it.Thank you

Hello Everyone Does anyone know how to adjust the CL tool path player simulation speed. With the slider set to as slow as possible, it is way too fast to see anything useful, there must be a way to alter the playback speed of the tool path player. Thank you Peter

While using the Creo plugin within Hexagon’s PC-DMIS to load an MBD model, I’m seeing some additional dimensions in PC-DMIS that were not actually created in Creo MBD Model.I’ve checked the annotations and combination states—everything looks clean in Creo. Is this a known issue with the plugin or PMI interpretation?Any suggestions to control or filter what PC-DMIS reads from the Creo model would be helpful.

While importing MBD .prt models into Creo NC:The Annotate tab is not visible, preventing access to combination states.Cross sections are lost, and PMI data is not retained.Looking for guidance on how to properly import an MBD model into Creo NC.Are there specific settings or configurations required to enable full PMI and combination state support?

Having some trouble with flattening a small harness with 2 wires. It's a very simple harness with a connector on one end and then 2 eyelets on the other. Ideally for the drawing Id like to have each wire coming out relative to where it would on the real connector. The picture shows about as good as I can get it.  Anything I try seems to screw it up in some form. Using the move segment tool works in some cases but if for example I want to move the red wire to the correct position I can move it but as soon as I confirm it it disappears from the window and in the model tree that part of the flatten harness turns red. So I delete it and have to re-flatten that section.  If I try and auto fan it it makes a big mess where the cables are twisted together. I have tried using the twist command but I can't seem to get that working either. There are times where I can get the connector to look right with the wires but then there is a twist going towards the eyelets and I still

Im running in Creo 10.0.3.0 and am having an issue getting usable code to post. My manufacturing assembly is generating toolpaths and everything simulates correctly. I am able to generate and save a CL file, no problem. When I go to 'Post a CL File', I choose the CL that was made, and select uncx01.p11 from the PP menu. We are using Haas VF4 mills and although this post is labeled for VF8 mills, we have had other engineers post code without issue in the past. The problem is nobody recalls what(if any) additional setup needed to be done. After I choose my post, I get a command prompt window displaying "NCL record= 200 ENTER PROGRAM NUMBER" I enter a short number like 0001 and I get the following log file: Log FileNC-GPOST Mill, Version 6.8 P-20.0, Copyright(c) 2020Build number=0279Date=08-19-2025 Time=09:54:02Input File=op010_FILE_mill.ncl.1Option File=uncx01.p11Filter File=uncx01.f11*** Tape length 12.00 Cycle time 1.48 Warnings 0 ***Date=08-19-2025 Time=09:54:

I'm using Creo 12.4.0 When changing the "circ_interpolation" factor, arc_only seems to be broken: "Points Only" simulation does the cut correctly: "Arc only" simulation only does the lead-in and lead-out:This is for a trajectory toolpath.  But it also applies to thread milling.  The "Arc Only" path cuts the lead-in/lead-out only and doesn't cut around the part like it should.  Both appear correct in the toolpath display, but on the simulation (and in real life) the paths are broken. Toolpath Display for either setting: Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug?  The workaround is to choose "points only", but this makes really huge gcode files.  And if I forget to change the setting, it can crash the tools.  

Hello, I have a question about restricting the tool within the milling window in high-speed machining (HSM), similar to volume milling. I would be very thankful if someone could share any sample files of HSM. regardsAsif 

Requesting EMX team to separate "Return pin" from ejector pin category.  The issue is during cleaning up ejector pins using command " delete all ejector pins" , this return pins will also get deleted and need to reassign all the references related to it. kindly check.

Hi everyone,I’m currently exploring Creo’s multi-axis manufacturing capabilities, specifically for impeller machining. I’ve already programmed and machined an impeller using Creo Multi-Axis, but all the strategies—roughing, blade finishing, and hub machining—had to be created manually. (Please see attached picture.)Other CAM software like Mastercam and Siemens NX offer dedicated modules or toolpaths tailored for impellers and other bladed components.So I’d like to ask:Does Creo offer any specialized tools or modules for 5-axis impeller machining?Are there built-in strategies for blade-to-blade finishing, tool tilting and collision avoidance, and roughing in deep/narrow passages?What about hub finishing with smooth transitions?Or is everything expected to be built manually through generic multi-axis features?I’d appreciate input from anyone who has experience machining turbomachinery parts in Creo.Thanks in advance!

Profile Milling with Tool Compensation and Ramp Entry or helical for Internal Profile Hello CREO Users,I am working on a milling operation for an internal profile (similar to a valve seat geometry) in Creo Manufacturing. My objective is to machine the internal contour using tool radius compensation (CUTCOM) and to ensure smooth ramp transitions between Z-level passes or using helical folling the profile to avoid marks on the final surface.I have tried the following approaches:The Cut Line strategy allows helical movements and smooth transitions between passes, but it does not support tool radius compensation (CUTCOM). This is a requirement for my process.The Profile Milling strategy does support CUTCOM, but it does not offer ramp or spiral entry between Z-level cuts. As a result, the tool plunges vertically at each level, which causes unwanted marks and steps in the internal diameter of the part.I've tried to explore all the SCAN_TYPE parameters. LEAD_IN and LEAD_OUT approach but

Hello, I receive the errror message listed in subject line when trying to post an NC file.  I have set the "ncpost_type" setting in the configuration editor previously.  I am using Creo 9.   Any help is appreciated.  

Hello  Is Creo Parametric CAM software outputting tilted work plane or dynamic fixture offsets?If yes, then how do  we use it with the combination of the post-processor regards Asif

hello experts I am asif from Karachi, Pakistan i have a question about the Creo post processor. How to add Pivot distance in dual rotary table 5-axis machine with PTC Creo. and  Swivel-Type (Head-Head) 5-Axis CNC in creo post processor. Please check the pic of the machine configuration. i want to update the post processor for both machines. Please guide. regards Asif

I'm trying to use a subroutine to create multiple parts in one program.  But instead of incrementing the position each time, it just cuts the first part position over and over again.  I've tried absolute / incremental, and I've tried the different "base coordinate system" options, and they all have the same effect.  My post isn't set up for subroutine program calls, so I always have "Copy CL" selected.  The simulation shows all 400 parts being cut correctly, but on the machine, only the first position is cut (over and over). It always outputs a fixture coordinate system (G110, G111, G112, etc.) and the X/Y positions just stay the same in each block.  I want the X/Y positions to increment with each block.  Anybody know what I'm doing wrong?  Or if there is some post option I need to edit? 

 Hi everyone, I just got access to Creo 11 and I'm struggling with one of the new features they added.For this model I want to use 4 axis HSM, however even if I select the B axis as rotatory (which means it rotates around the Y axis) the machining area I can select is always a cylinder around the Z axis and I can't figure out how to change it. My work center settings also specify it revolves around the Y axis but it just doesn't allow me to change the axis of the machining area. Any idea on how to solve this?

Good day.Has anyone encountered this error message in the log of messages?No relations have been defined for this model.I am seeing this in a few of our programs but cannot seem to find any "wrong" relations within the various parts or sequences.This creates an extremely long set of log messages which cannot seem to be resolved.I have found this article from Creo3 (2015) but with zero answer to this specific message inside, despite mentioning it... Currently on Creo 9.https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS196584If there are no relations and it  provides this error, is Creo indicating a requirement for relations in the sequences?Any help would be much appreciated.

Would anyone care to comment on the Mold Machining Extension (MMX)?  What does it offer over and above what is in the NC complete set module for 3 axis milling?

Hello Creo experts,I have a question regarding volume milling. I have often chosen to use rough or HSM sequences instead of volume milling for roughing operations. However, I've noticed that the cycle time for HSM and rough sequences is not as good as I expected. Despite being named high-speed milling, the cycle time is actually longer than the volume milling cycle for the same pocket size. Can you please advise on the parameters I may be missing to achieve a shorter cycle time compared to volume milling on the same size pocket?Regards,Asif Fisa

Hello, dear community members!I want to design a mold cavity, but I am stuck on "Volume Split." I can't run this command, and after doing some research, I noticed that the problem is related to the "Parting Surface." I received the following error: The parting surface has 3 contour(s), make sure that each is necessary. Could you please help me solve it? Please check the attachments as well.

I am using Creo Parametric Release 2.0 and DatecodeM040abbiamo spostato correttamente creo m040 dal vecchio pc al nuovo, ma la parte CAM non funziona. non apre nemmeno il file di fabbricazione.Here are the errors that I facedabbiamo spostato correttamente creo m040 dal vecchio pc al nuovo, ma la parte CAM non funziona. non apre nemmeno il file di fabbricazione.

I am using Creo Parametric Release 2.0 and DatecodeM040abbiamo trasferito la versione da un vecchio pc a questo, ma la parte di manufacturing non funziona e non apre neanche i file di fabbricazioneHere are the errors that I facedabbiamo trasferito la versione da un vecchio pc a questo, ma la parte di manufacturing non funziona e non apre neanche i file di fabbricazione

Hello, I am currently using the base EMX extension and I noticed the extension utilizes injection molding. I wanted to know if the EMX extension is capable of creating plates/molds for pulp molding? Thank you.

  Hello Creo Experts, I have a question regarding volume milling. I typically choose volume rough milling sequences for my roughing operations. But now trying to use HSM Milling.. However, I've noticed that the cycle times of HSM sequences are not as efficient as I expected. Despite their name, high-speed milling cycles are actually longer than those of volume milling for the same pocket size. Could you please advise me on any parameters I might be overlooking to achieve a shorter cycle time with HSM or rough sequences compared to volume milling for the same pocket size? Please check the attached MFG file its creo 11 mfg file  Regards, Asif Fisa

I am using Creo Parametric Release 10.0 and Datecode10.0.5.0For hole making manufacturing sequences, for whatever reason ours defaults to all models instead of reference model. To be more clear, I'm referring to when you click on the Mill tab>Holemaking Cycles>Standard (or whatever floats your boat)>References>Details>Options...the dropdown here defaults to All Models, and I am wanting it to default to reference models, since i am setting my reference model. As you can imagine, when we go to make a new program based off of an existing one, and we remove a fixture component, it causes manufacturing sequences to fail because they are being tied to these random models instead of just to the reference model.I have searched config.pro options and the knowledge database and I'm finding nothing that can point me in the right direction on whether the default to this can be set when creating new sequences. If this does not already exist, can this be added as a config.pro option?