Windchill

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 11.1 and Datecode with CPS M020-CPS25 My Pretest server is not working .

Is there any configuration required to enable POSASSY/Positioning Assembly publishing in worker?

I want to understand the behavior of the following APIPublisherAction publisherAction = new PublisherAction();publisherAction.addAction(PublisherAction.POSASSY, true);publisherAction.addAction(PublisherAction.PROCESSTYPE, "");What is the difference when PublisherAction.POSASSY is set to true versus false? What is its purpose, and how does it affect the publishing process?Also, what is the purpose of PublisherAction.PROCESSTYPE? What values can be passed to this parameter, and how do those values influence the publishing behavior?

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.2.7 Windchill 錯誤 請連絡您的管理員以尋求協助。 隨後會附上其參考資訊。 請求 Id: 165h27ik;mr9feu93;21348;6lxy9d;11095 請求 URI: /Windchill/ptc1/searchResultsComp 查詢字串: fireSearch=true 狀況代碼: 501 訊息: 您的工作階段資料已過期。請重覆您的動作 目前時間: 2026-07-07 09:32:38.436 +0800

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.2.25 电子仓库下某些文件夹生成大量的.unreferenced文件，占用很大空间，这部分未引用文件从何而来？如何排查

how to get secondary classification node with its corresponding attribute and value of each part for qml report. help is there any table joins and configuration in qml will get my requirement or need java code if you have java code pls. give me 

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 11.1 and Datecode with CPS M020-CPS20 I am connected to the server but I can't activate a workspace

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.2.20 The syncing issue of CAD data with WT part. While using build level option it is throwing an error Build failed: The following parts were not built, because the related CAD Documents are unverified or not regenerated in CAD Tool. Even after regenrating the parts are not build with CAD Data.

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.2.18 Hello, We would like to request guidance regarding operating system upgrade compatibility for our Windchill environment. Current Environment: - Windchill Version: 12.0.2.18 - Components: - Windchill PDMLink 12.0.2.18 - Info*Engine 12.0.2.18 - REST Services 2.7.1 - Creo View Adapters 8.0 - Current OS: Windows Server 2016 Planned Change: We are planning an in-place OS upgrade of the Windchill servers, with target versions: - Windows Server 2019 - Windows Server 2022 Questions: 1. Is Windchill 12.0.2.18 supported on: - Windows Server 2019 - Windows Server 2022 2. Is there a preferred or recommended OS version for this Windchill release? 3. Will the OS upgrade have any impact on Windchill components, services, or integrations, and are there any specific actions required after the upgrade? Additional Context: We plan to validate the upgrade in a DEV environment first, followed by PROD during a w

Did PTC change how licensing works for multiple Creo workers on same machine?  We previously had  1 PROE_FoundationVis license for multiple workers set up on our visualization machine for many years as directed both here: https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS29308 and here: https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS473636 but when our contract was renewed, it seems PTC removed the  DUP_GROUP = "UHD"  directive from the PROE_FoundationVis license (as well as our Creo Advanced and Creo Advanced Professional licenses), and now each worker seems to pull a license.  That directive allows “Same user on same host and same display consumes one license even with multiple xtop processes” -- Found out the hard way when our extra workers went to start up and I got 1200 emails informing me that my CAD worker failed to start.  Anyone know if this was intentional on the part of PTC?  I have a case open - and I tried reaching out to License Management but got disconnected after being on hold for 20

I am using Windchill MPMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.2.9 When working in Windchill, I am unable to copy an operation from the folder view and paste it into the Process Plan structure tree using 'Paste Special

Is there an API available to retrieve the General Status of an EPMDocument?I would like to determine whether the General Status of an EPMDocument is New.I already have the EPMDocument object available. 

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.1 and Datecode with CPS 12.1.0.0 漏洞扫描问题，是否有什么规避方法

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 11.1 and Datecode with CPS M020 CPS30 Extend length of the WTPart attribute Number characters upto 50 from 40 in Windchill PDMLink Here are the errors that I faced The number of characters in this attribute value can be no more than 40. The number of characters currently entered is 41.

Hello, Does anyone has an example on how you have implemented the reset of an enumeration list. I have a class that generate a list of wtpart in a text file. But I need to stop windchill and clear the cache to gets the new data. I'm trying to use this method but I'm struggling to get the EnumerationInfoProvider. EnumerationInfomanager.resetEnumeration(EnumerationInfoProvider)   If anyone has an example it will be great. Note I used the following code to generate my list: https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article?n=CS138327&source=subscription   thanks

The requirement is to ensure that specific attributes of a WTPart are strictly read-only across all user interfaces whenever the part belongs to the Manufacturing View. This restriction must apply universally, including during standard object modification (Edit Part wizard) and within structural manipulation tools like the BOM Transformer (downstream view).Current Progress & Technical Challenge Edit Part Wizard (Success): The read-only behavior was successfully implemented for the standard Edit Part wizard by creating a custom DataUtility and overriding the getDataValue() method. BOM Transformer (Issue): The same logic fails in the BOM Transformer's downstream view. Attempting to override getPlainDataValue() does not prevent inline editing. This occurs because the BOM Transformer relies on tree-grid components and operational descriptors (ComponentMode) that bypass standard plain text data value rendering during inline edit cycles.

Just posting a clarifying question to field. This article discusses mitigation steps as well as temp patches. We have implemented the mitigation steps (Apache changes and wt.properties changes) and now applied the temp patch.Then it says that once patch is applied to remove the mitigation steps. I just to be clear about what can be removed. It appears like the “wt.manager.serialFilte” changes to the wt.properties.xconf remain. It seems to indicate the two Apache mitigation steps, 92- and 90-, should be removed. Or is it just -90, Apache work around 1, that should be removed? Going back to the previous CVE (https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS466318), this also had us create an Apache work around (also 90-) blocking a Publish URL. I did not see instructions to remove this once patch was applied.  Lastly, there was another Apache mitigation (https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS466866?source=search) which created 91- conf file, blocking “ReconnectedHttpURLCon” URL. Appears no pa

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.1 and Datecode with CPS 12.1.0.2 Good morning, our users are having trouble uploading files to Windchill/Creo 8. When they try to save the file on the client, they get the following error: “HTTP Upload Failed.” “Content upload failed due to an invalid response from the server.” Today,after check the problem with users, we restarted the server where Windchill is installed, which also serves as “Intralink” for our plant’s site. After the restart, they were able to save a file once, but then the error reappeared. We need support to analyze and resolve this issue. Here are the errors that I faced 2026-06-25 15:39:06,660 ERROR [pool-3-thread-1] wt.fv.StandardFvService username- Exception while trying to delete physical folder null for rootFolder : null java.lang.NullPointerException 2026-06-25 15:39:06,660 ERROR [pool-3-thread-1] wt.fv.StandardFvService username - Exception occured in addRemoteAutoFolderComplete java.lang.NullPointerException 20

OOTB notifications shall be managed at the user level through user preferences. Specifically, it should be possible to disable both subscription and workflow notifications for an individual user who does not require them.

Hi TeamDoes ODATA Reporting Domain work for you? I get 500 on all tests.https://DOMAIN.com/Windchill/netmarkets/html/wrs/doc.htmlchoose Reporting Domain v1choose a reportclick 'Try it out'click 'Execute'result code is 500curl -X 'GET' \'https://DOMAIN.com:443/Windchill/servlet/odata/v1/Reporting/OpenChangeNoticess?%24count=false' \-H 'accept: application/json'java.lang.NullPointerExceptionat com.ptc.odata.core.entity.processor.ProviderProcessor.readEntityCollection(ProviderProcessor.java:254)at com.ptc.odata.core.entity.processor.EntityProviderProcessor.readEntityCollection(EntityProviderProcessor.java:114)at com.ptc.odata.windchill.entity.service.WcEntityProviderProcessor.readEntityCollection(WcEntityProviderProcessor.java:290)at org.apache.olingo.server.core.ODataDispatcher.handleEntityCollectionDispatching(ODataDispatcher.java:529)at org.apache.olingo.server.core.ODataDispatcher.handleEntityDispatching(ODataDispatcher.java:511)at org.apache.olingo.server.core.ODataDispatcher.handleR

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 13.0 and Datecode with CPS 13.0.0.0 Windchill 오류 지원이 필요하면 관리자에게 문의하십시오. 참조 정보는 다음과 같습니다. 요청 ID: 요청 URI: /Windchill/servlet/WindchillGW 질의 문자열: 상황 코드: 404 메시지: 현재 시간: 2026-06-25 15:40:24.120 +0900

how to get the NonConformance Review through the NonConformance object.

Hello experts,We have a case where the PLM IT team do not want to take ownership of creating and maintaining the Windchill groups , say around 30.Even though the best practice of providing access control to the users is via Role to Group mapping in each context is widely used, and the Windchill support team is generally maintains the groups - Member add / delete and new group creation, here its becoming a big tug of war.We have some power users in departments, they might be needed to maintain the groups, but they are not given ORG Admin priveleges.Question: IS there a way to provide a privelege - > Org>Creators> Groups,,,? like the similar way of Product or Project or Library creators??This would be the best solution I reckon.Any thought process? Thanks & Best Regards  

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.1 and Datecode with CPS 12.1.1.2 Currently, I'm having some trouble adding an overview file to the workflows; even with wcadmin, I get the error below. What are the possible issues, and how can I solve them? Here are the errors that I faced ATTENTION: Error occurred while saving the resource data.

We're exploring a field performance insights capability — one that surfaces service data back to the people who design and qualify parts. Before we go too deep on data models and UI, I want to make sure we're solving for the right signal, not just the available one.Here's the problem we're trying to solve:Today, when a product design or quality engineer is deciding whether to reuse a part in a next-gen design, they're largely flying blind on field performance. Mean time between failures, common fault patterns, the maintenance burden the part creates for service teams — that data exists somewhere in ServiceMax, but it's not reaching the people who need it at the moment they need it.The result? Reuse decisions get made without field feedback. Known problem parts get carried forward. And service teams keep absorbing the cost of design decisions that could have gone differently.What I'm trying to understand from this community:If you were making a part reuse decision for a next-gen product