Analysis

HiDoes anyone know how I can export my multifluid results from a transient creo parametric flow analysisI am using Creo Parametric 12.4.0The button "save animation" does not work  

Hello, I am attempting to run a structural design study within Creo Simulate 7.0.4.0. There is a pop-up window that says "The selected functionality requires a Basic Creo Simulate license". From what I read online, you need three licenses (MECELITEUI, MECELITEENG, and CREOSIM_Standard) to access the basic functionalities of Creo Simulate. From ptcstatus, I can see that I am not pulling a MECELITEENG license (even though that license is available on the server).PTCSTATUS shows this:License In Use Free------- ------ ----PROE_DesignEssH Uncounted, LockedPROE_EssentialsPMHome Uncounted, LockedMECELITEENG_License Uncounted, LockedMECELITEENG_License 0 8MECELITEENG_License 0 34MECELITEUI_License Uncounted, LockedMECELITEUI_License 1 7MECELITEUI_License 0 34MathcadPrime Uncounted, LockedMathcadPrime 0 2PROE_EssentialsP 0 8PROE_DesignEss 25 3PROE_EssentialsPM 0 6MECBASICENG_License 0 3MECBASICUI_License 0 3MathcadPrimeSDK 0 2CREOSCHEM_Lite 0 8CREOSCHEM_Lite 0 34CREOSIM_STANDARD 1 2My

I am looking for a more detailed step per step explanation for the Creo FlowAnalysis Premium Module. I need to perform a gear box analysis with the multiphase and the rotation 1DoF module. I have not found any files about the rotation module.Does anyone know where I can finde some information about this topic´? Thanks

What is the correct workflow in simulate - assembly to replace a component with a point mass idealization at the part C.O.G. and constrain it to the assembly with links?When using mass idealization - component at point - the following notification appears: "You have included a mass idealization of a component which contains the highlighted volumes that will be meshed during an analysis. This will result in the mass being accounted for twice in the run."If I create a simplified representation of the part which removes the solid geometry, the simplified representation removes the component from view entirely (including the cog datum point defined in the part).My current approach is to open the part/subassembly to idealize, do mass properties, enable X/Y/Z COG features, then create an offset point with relations using those features to define it. Then I return to the assembly simulation and create an assembly datum point at the assy level defined by the COG location point within the part.

Hi PTC,I'm using creo6.0 with T1 license, I want to do modal analysis but the function seems unable, the button is gray. My GPU is nvidia quadro p2000 and I have already updated the driver. Please give me some advises, thank you!  

I'm trying to build a CREO Mechanism for lead screw, I'm using Slot connection to define the lead screw mechanism. Now I'm running a dynamic analysis by selecting friction in external loads options. but im unable to input the friction value. Does creo assume a value, or can  I input a value

Here is a free Tutorial for Creo Simulate Elite (Creo Design Essentials User).   3 x part in Creo 11 HomeUse or 3 x part as STEP

I am using Creo Simulate Release N/A and DatecodeN/ADie Modalanalyse ergab 58 Eigenmoden. Danach möchte ich eine dynamische Analyse im Zeitbereich machen (um die Erregerkräfte in die Struktur einspielen zu können). Wie gewohnt natürlich im Reiter "Vorherige Analyse" die besagte Modalanalyse gewählt. Weiters möchte ich die Dämpfungskoeffizienten für jeden Eigenmode individuell eingeben ... also dementsprechend eingestellt ... und ich hätte erwartet, dass ich nun 58 Eingabemöglichkeiten bekomme. Leider wurden mir nur 4 Eingabemöglichkeiten (für die ersten 4 Eigenmoden) angeboten.Woran könnte dies liegen?Habe derartige Berechnungen schon öfter gemacht und konnte bis jetzt auch die Dämpfungskoeffizienten immer individuell einstellen.Danke schön für Hilfe.SG Markus Plainer

I am not able to find the enclosure volume. option not highlighted.     

I want to understand the need for the memory allocation limits of 16 Gb for 64 bit machines?? i understand the need of having enough memory for the operating system, but now that machines with 32, 64 and even 128 Gb are comun. I am asking this because i have a model that the global matrix profile is around 100 Gb on the last pass of the MPA analysis and I am working on a machine with 128Gb of RAM

Hello, how can I replace in simulation those kind of bolted joints so preload is included. I need to create linear simulation with bolted joints and analyse those joints so they are accurately represented. The problem is Creo simulate can't create bolted joint while there are more than two parts bolted togeather. Can those bolted joints be recreated as a  beam structure or any kind of spring structure?Thank you in advance

I learned a little bit, but I haven't mastered it at all.It should be cold at one end and hot at the other, but I didn't expect that one end is hot and the other end is even hotter.Is there expert tell me where I am wrong?

I’m have a CFD project with an oil/water heat exchanger in a hydraulic tank. I would be studying how effective the cooler is at lowering the temperature of the oil over a given time so, it would be a transient analysis. The cooler has two cores with water looping through them in series. Each core has 182 copper tubes that are 0.4 mm thick and 170 aluminum fins that are 0.25 mm thick with a spacing of about 1.73 mm. I want to do cunjugate heat transfer across the solid geometry, but with so many components that are thin walled, the number of cells in the mesh woul be astronomical.  I'm looking for suggestions on a basic approach to this analysis.  Can the tubes and fins be compressed to mid-surfaces and run in CFA? That would require fewer cells in the solid domains. I see that there is something buried in the mesher about two fluid heat exchangers, but I haven't been able to find information on how to utilize that. Some direction there would be helpful too.  &n

Hello everyone, I am currently working on a Creo Flow Analysis for a vacuum system. I was able to successfully set up an internal flow simulation, but I am facing errors when trying to include the ambient airflow around the nozzle.What I have set up successfully:Internal flow only:Inlet (nozzle entry): Set as 101325 Pa (atmospheric pressure).Outlet (nozzle exit, connected to the vacuum system): Defined as Volumetric Flux 400 m³/h (0.111 m³/s).This setup runs without issues.What I am trying to add:I want to simulate how air is being drawn from the surroundings into the nozzle.To do this, I added a large surrounding box to represent the air environment.The walls of the box are defined as inlet and outlet pressures (atmospheric pressure, 101325 Pa).The issue:When I include the ambient air domain, I get errors on the inlet and outlet boundaries of the nozzle.It seems like Creo does not handle both the internal flow and external airflow together properly.My goal is to see where the noz

can you tell me how to use this function. where is the Creat linked volume？

Hello, I am trying to render a simple fluid flow simulation in Simulation Live for Creo 9.0.1.0. When I add particles to the display it runs at about 2 FPS, this is with the Performance options set all the way to the left for "Speed". At this time, Creo is using 0-2% of my GPU.However, what is interesting, is when I rotate the model, the GPU usage jumps up to 60-70% and the FPS is smooth (closer to 30 FPS or more).  I want to be able to have this speed and quality of animation without having to continuously rotate the model. Is this possible?   

So, I joined a company that uses CREO 10. When I got here, I found out they also have SW Pro with SIM Pro with ECAD thermal analysis. I asked why and they stated that CREO Sim doesn't provide ECAD thermal analysis. So, I personally would rather use SW for our CAD - especially since we do the ECAD sim in SW already. Otherwise, it would be great to find a solution for CREO and move away from SW Sim. Now I know Ansys runs within CREO - but does CREO have a basic ECAD thermal simulation that is acceptable? Keep in mind money is the driving factor here - so spending 10's of thousands of dollars is not an option. So, the process of going from CREO to SW is just painful. If CREO has a decent solution it would solve a ton of issues. Is CREO simulation - especially for ECAD that bad? So, what does SW ECAD Sim offer - it allows for PCB board simplification allowing to input the PCB layers with copper weights - it allows for 2-R definition of electrical components - it allows for CFD an

I have been performing mechanism analysis for some time but I usually use align two entities and mate two entities  option when creating initial point snapshots, either method gives me same results. I wonder what's the main difference between two options , I would like a very good use case to differentiate between them both. 

Hello,I'm currently trying out the new Ansys Simulation Module. By doing so I wanted to run a couple of simulations but the Buttons "run" and "Generate Mesh" are greyed out. I've checked with a couple of different models and I've also created one just for checking the behavior. Even with just a cube, I can reproduce this behavior (Screenshots attached). Has anyone come across this problem and knows how to solve it? I'm starting to think it must have something to do with some settings?    Any help is appreciated! 

I am using Creo Simulate Release N/A and DatecodeN/AI am running a simulation on a two piece aerofoil. The applied pressures are entered via .fnf files generated using Creo Flow Analysis. The aim is to run a baseline configuration and obtain the Fx and Fz loads to give lift and drag. The next step is to vary the angle of the aerofoil flap and compare the values for Fx and Fz to baseline.Unfortunately the assembly will run in baseline configuration and with the flap angle increased by 1 degree, but fails if the flap angle is reduced by 1 degree. This happens at other angles too but I cannot see why.Here are the errors that I facedSingular mapping, solid element: 1345420The design study terminated abnormally.The element with DBID 1345420 has invalid geometry.

I am trying to perform a Vibration Analysis on an assembly in Creo Simulate (in Creo Parametric Version 10). The only input data I have is the Vibration Amplitude vs. Frequency table below. I was wondering if it is possible to do an analysis in Simulate with this type of data. Is so, would it fall under the "Shock" category under the  "New Dynamic" analysis option? Or would it be under another category? An input on this matter would be helpful. Thanks.   

Hi all,I'm trying to automate the process of taking screenshots of simulation models from different angles in Creo Simulate. My goal is to change the view orientation without triggering a full recalculation of the model.I discovered that Creo Simulate can write the view matrix directly into an .rwt file. So, I wrote a simple Python script that generates a custom view matrix and inserts it into a template .rwt file. When I reload the file, the view updates to the new orientation as expected.However, there's a problem: instead of simply rotating the model, Creo seems to fully regenerate or recalculate the view, which adds unnecessary delay. I was hoping for a lightweight change—just to adjust the camera/view angle without triggering a full redraw or computation.My question is:Is there a way to apply a custom view matrix directly to the current view in Creo Simulate, without forcing a full view recalculation?Alternatively, is there a more efficient way to programmatically change the view

Hello everyone! My company uses Creo 7.0.9. I am utilizing J-Link (Java Object Toolkit free) to create some programs to automate some repetitive tasks. I need your help in automating the running of predefined FEA simulations, or at least fixing my code so far..._______________________________________________________________________________________________Problem Background / Goal: One of the features I want to have in my J-Link programs is the ability to rerun predefined simulations from code... meaning I as the engineer set up everything from conditions to loads, and get the simulation all ready to go, and my J-Link application really just has to hit the run button. The use case here is: I have other already functioning j-link code to change parameters of loads, so the idea is in the future, I can have some automated way of testing 15 different loads, running the FEA each time, saving results, and maybe even making me a graphic or something like that... _____________________

I am using Creo Parametric Release 3.0 and DatecodeM140CREO3.0挂Creo Advanced simulation Extension的模块 使用，To run Creo Ansys Simulation on your computer you must instal the latest 6.0.x version of the following x64 .NET packagesMicrosoft .NETCore.AppMicrosoft .NET Desktop RuntimeMicrosoft .AspNetCore.AppDownload and install these packages, Start Creo again and then open Creo Ansys Simulation.

Hi,I would like to simulate the vibration pipe stress with frequency response (FRA).The source of vibration came from motor in compressor that we know frequency input that simulate from 20 Hz to 100 Hz   Load Set- Internal pipe pressure 3 bar- gravity load- torque from compressor The steps 1. Static analysis with pressure and gravity2. Prestress Modal analysis using the above static analysis for prestress.3. Run Frequency response dynamics analysis with torque varies on frequency. Are these steps correct? However, on FRA I don't know the amplitude. How can I find this amplitude?Also, There are 2 loading load functions and base excitation. My understanding this simulate should do the base excitation due to there are vibration from the base that pipe connected. Is this correct?  Also, the what is the value in base excitation and how can I find the amplitude. And in the calculate that relative to Ground and Supports. What are different of this 2?&nb