CAD

Hello,we are getting this error PRO_TK_CANT_MODIFY (-48) trying to assign a parameter value or creating a new parameter. I found this https://www.ptc.com/en/support/article/CS419066: from Creo 10.0 on, object are requested to be in checkout state to modify parameters, when used with Windchill.Do you know if there is any options to workaround this?As developers, we need to revise and complicate our logic flow to add a checkout to our customization routine. That could be expensive and time-consuming.Thanks a lot 

Enable Volumetric flow rate & volumetric flux in section window of post processing Creo Flow Analysis. Can anyone suggest any workaround? when will PTC introduce these variables in Creo Flow Analysis ? Is there any development / work going on related to this subject?  

There was a problem installing the application. The first time I installed it and worked in it. Then the application disappeared from the computer by itself. When you try to download it back (it shows what has been downloaded), it does not appear on the computer.

Currently have PTC Mathcad 14 on my old machine and i downloaded mathcard 15. i tried to transfer the License.DAT file from old to new and it says there's a problem. i re-run the wizard and select the license.DAT file and it says import successfull or something to that effect. i close the window and re-launch the program and get the same issue.. I tried installing mathcard 14 and did same thing and get same issue. i'm trying to retire my old computer and put it on the new updated system.please advise.

I hope everyone is doing well. While plotting a graph, I receive an error.Please assist me in fixing the issue.Please find the attached document below. Thanks and regards.MSRAZA.  

Hello, everyone friends, please ask, creo nc how to use 5-axis processing glasses model.

Toolkit for Java and Python (how we can use it to automate our design process)Paint calculation based on the surface are of a part (we are currently doing it manually, would prefer to know if there is any automatic process)BOM Creation without repeat region that shows the material required per partDXF creation for Sheetmetal parts with 1:1 scale that can be used for nestingAutomatic drawing creation

What software do I need to open and view a .pha file?  I tried Creo View Lite, but it doesn't support it.

This is the function I need to reach  f1 and qc are matrics >> so I define another variable nthen I define M(a,b) to multiple dz by n then I define Mi,north to multiple qc by n Then I get the results equal to NaN  So I used filterNaN function  and after doing all of this >> I didn't get the answer hhhhhhIs there any away I can simplify the function I want, and get the answer The sheet is too long this , I couldn't explain what I need in shorter sheet>> sorry  page 19 prime 10 

I have seen this before, just can't find it. We are thinking of creating BOM tables to compare different assembly configurations in a single table. Is there an easy way to do this in Creo?  Assembly 101 Assembly 103 Assembly 105 Assembly 107 Part number Description X X X X 101 Main Piece X   X   102 Support A   X   X 103 Support B X       104 Top Cap 1   X     105 Top Cap 2     X   106 Top Cap 3       X 107 Top Cap 4

So I've been working on a very simple part with some GD&T callouts and have now encountered my fourth issue trying to do basic annotations (Creo 6). This time, I've noticed that attaching a runout callout to a surface results in a filled arrow in the feature control frame (I'm not talking about the leader arrow). When attaching to a witness line extending from the part object line, the symbol in the feature control frame turns into a stroked arrow. See attached image. This is frustrating because attaching to the witness line is the only way I've found to enable a gap between the FCF and the object line when placing the FCF against a surface. Another question so I don't keep making posts, how does one callout a set of chamfers that were all made in one set of the chamfer feature tool? Show Annotations gives me AxD dimension, but not the 2X callout. I added the 2X in the attached image, which is not parametric and thus not preferred.

Hello All, Software Version: PTC Creo Parametric  9.0.3.0 We are trying to use the repeat region of a drawing table to input assembly data from left to right. However, the system default inputs this information from top to bottom.  Specifically, we have a cable assembly that is made up of a single cable and a terminal on both ends. I would like the repeat region to input the data horizontally rather than vertically. We are using the repeat region symbols:asm.nameasm.mbr.nameWe have tried the asm.mbr.name:1 or :2 to see if the code will have the individual part for the respective column but this did not populate. Is the below example possible, or will the system default always be a vertical entry and there is no possible way of changing it to horizontal? Want to have Table Example:Assembly PN          Cable PN         Terminal 1 PN          Terminal 2 PNAssembly 1  &nb

I am using the ANSI Flare Bevel weld symbol in PTC Creo 8.0.8.0, and there seems to be a large space between the flare bevel symbol and the flush and grind symbol. So much space that the flush and grind symbol hardly appears to be applied to the weld symbol.  Can this space be reduced relative to the rest of the symbol? Or maybe another solution? I've tried changing the font size, but this makes everything smaller. I've also tried the different weld symbols (simple, combination, braze, and ISO) but none of these options are a good solution.  Not looking for a solution involving adding a sketch line and/or Text Note.  Thanks for your time,Kevin 

Hello, I have created an MBD with several notes that contain a hyperlink to another combined view. People in the factory can click this link and the corrosponding view pops up. This works in Creo Parametric (10). However in Creo view it only works when you click the actual text instead of the text box. So for example the empty space inside an "O" is not clickable.Is there a way to fix this?

Hello, everyone. I am looking for a way to identify cabling/harness elements, specifically ".prt" type by using a repeat region.So far, by using "asm > mbr > type" it is possible to identify parts, assemblies and skeletons. By setting the repeat region to find certain properties in the parameters, I can identify sheet metal and piping components. But, I have not found a way to identify cabling parts. Yes, in my case I have them modeled from the cabling application. Yeah, I know there are some repeat regions configured to list cabling/harness properties, BUT I cannot enter 1 by 1 in the subassemblies and set them as primary model for my tables. Then: I need to find a way to identify cables from a master assembly or top level. It can be by invoking a parameter/properties to include in the repeat region that only cabling elements have. Or any other identifier.NO: at this stage of the project I cannot add a new string parameter saying it is a cable. I ha

Hi there ,I have a nested variable called x =[k v m] as shown in the screen shotI need to divide x by n  which means that each row in x will be divided by n >>> so k/n , v/n, and m/n>>>> the result should look like xThanks in advance

TLDR:  Is there a way for a table BOM balloon to have multiple leaders pointing to the correct objects? We have finally made the move to tables and balloons in our newly created assembly drawings.  It took  14.56 seconds after we went live for a user to bring up a scenario w/o an immediate solution. When we were creating dumb part number notes we would create a leader to each part in an assembly.  Example would be PEM fasteners in a plate of sheet metal.  If there were five of one part number in one location and six of another part number in another location, we would just put a leader to all items of a part number Now that we have moved over to balloons we are using split quantity balloons (image balloon_1.png).  To accomplish the same result we would need a balloon on each part.  In this case we would need 14 different balloons for the two part numbers.   What the user ended up doing is shown in balloon_2.png.  Get

Hello All, I am trying to recreate the solutions in Prime 10 to a 'characteristic equation' from a technical paper involving the Bessel functions.The equation to be solved is shown belowThe first 10 solutions is given as: However it appears that the solve block essentially just returns my inputs  I have removed all units as I recall in the older versions of Prime that units in the solve block tend result in errors. I have never had to use the Bessel functions, so I am not sure if I am overlooking something or making a simple error given how the equation is stated. Can anyone review and provide some guidance ?

Hi there, today, when I started Creo10, this message pop up: Why, the heck, does PTC Creo 10 require my location now? Has anyone experienced the same?

I have tried many different export options trying to keep my grouping hierarchy in Creo Illustrate. But anytime I import an FBX file, all objects are just pulled into the root object and groupings are lost. This is not the case with some other formats like DAE, but the file size is to large for the pipeline I am involved in.  I have prepared the FBX files in both Maya and Blender with the same results.  Does anyone know a process to keep the hierarchy that I might have missed? Looking to save a lot of rework by finding a solution.  (Sorry if this is in the wrong area, not exactly sure where to put a Creo Illustrate question, a mod can feel free to move or message me where to remake the post if needed)

Hello All,We have a problem with the Ansys Simulation module in Creo 11.0.0.0. When we run the simulation with the default settings, it always shows the message: "Solve I Failed I 0% completed," even when running with a simple part, and then stops without showing any results.We had no such problem in Ansys Simulation when using Creo 10 on the same hardware. Why is this happening?Our hardware: Windows 11, 28 GB memory, AMD Epyc 7V12 (4 CPUs), 2.4GHz, and NVIDIA T4. Thanks in advance to anyone who may assist us solve this issue.

Team, Does anyone have a Mathcad Prime routine to calculate the unsigned Stirling numbers of the first kind? Thanks,Glen Atlas, MD

I need to choose the minimum value of q depending on the layer thickness...If the layer thickness is =< 2m the q should be the minimum value of ( q;avg or 12MPa) if the layer thickness is > 2m q should be the minimum value of ( q;avg or 15MPa) I tried to do it this way, but it is not working.  Can you spot the mistake in this , please?Thanks in advanceYusra Prime 9 page 12 

We are unable to locate license purchased under this account. We need to remove the license from an old machine and apply it to a new machine. Please assist in locating the license and how we can transfer the license to a new device.Thank you!

Hi, I created account to use the Creo Elements Direct Modeling Express 8.0 as a private user for free but the app is asking me for a company proxy server settings. I have not a company. I would be just privet user. If not possible I would delete  my account.What I can do to use the free app?If not possible, how I can delete my account connected with my email "kacparek@wp.pl"? Thanks in advance