Creo+ and Creo Parametric

Hi! I have a part with different holes. In my 2D drawing I am using the default hole table from Creo (v8.09). It shows for example M2.5x.45 ISO in the cell but when I look at the hole annotation, it shows M2.5x.45 ISO - H2.7 DRILL ( 2.700 ) THRU So why it doesn't show this in the hole table? I tried to change in the table the definition of the cell to include these information. Then I go back to the part and back again to the drawing and the cell content is back to what it was before. Why is that? Also I have a clearance hole on the part, but in the hole table it shows M2.5x.45 ISO. This is wrong.

Clicking setup.exe during Creo installation produces no response. How can I solve this?

As autocad. I have many 2D drawings, each drawing is a .DWR file. Is there any tool in the Drawing interface of Creo 12 to quickly combine many drawings into one DWR file? Thanks

Hi,Can someone show the method how can i get this space in between dimension line?How to break the dimension line to allow another line go through? CREO VERSION 9.0.6

We use PTC CREO for our engineering system, I am being told that we cannot export drawing to a directory in PDF format in part number order. Is it possible? 

Hi everyone, I'm currently working with PTC Creo Web.Link and trying to determine whether it's possible to designate a parameter specifically associated with a FeatureID within an assembly context.I've reviewed the Web.Link documentation and found the method pfcScript.pwlParameterDesignationAdd(), which seems to apply only to general model parameters. However, I haven't found any reference to designating parameters that are tied directly to a FeatureID. Has anyone successfully designated a parameter linked to a specific feature within an assembly using Web.Link? If so, could you share any insights, approaches, or code examples?Any guidance would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance!

I am using Creo Parametric Release 7.0 and Datecode7.0.8.0Our team makes models (assemblies to be precise) of chips/substrates that have a rectangular body, an overlay showing bump circles, and hundreds to thousands of solder ball models patterned over the bump circles that were imported from dwg onto the model's surface. The pattern part is currently tricky and involves a lot of file conversions and scripting outside of Creo to make a pattern table that meets the formatting required. I wanted to see if there is a way (or request this feature) to be able to pattern each solder ball over each bump circle by recognizing the pattern of bump circles. I know there is a feature recognition of patterns and ability to write/read that pattern table, but it does not recognize lines, only edges/surfaces of holes. The ability to recognize the edge of an imported circle for this feature recognition functionality would allow us to save multiple steps.

I am using Creo Parametric Release 7.0 and Datecode7.0.8.0I'm working with Creo Parametric 7.0 and preparing a model for FEM meshing in Altair SimLab. I need to divide a surface on the model to isolate a specific region for mesh control. In Creo 9.0, I know there's a "Divide Surface" feature that makes this easy, but it's not available in version 7.0.I’ve tried using the Split Surface tool, but it doesn’t allow me to sketch and limit the division to a specific area. What I need is a way to sketch a region on an existing surface and divide it so that SimLab can recognize it as a separate surface during import.In CATIA, I would use the "Sew Surface" function to achieve this, and SimLab would correctly identify the separated surface. Is there a workaround or alternative method in Creo 7.0 to achieve similar functionality?Any guidance or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

I want to learn Creo parameter and Relations for 2d drawing. please suggest me best tutorial for that. I am using Creo 10. Thank you.

We would like to have three additional fields added in Creo NC for the tool type “Reaming”: “tip angle”, “tip offset”, and “tip diameter”. "Picture 1 Reaming" Our colleagues in programming would like to control the depth during programming—similar to “Drilling” and “Thread Cutting”—using these additional fields.This would be a considerable relief during programming, as the chamfer/lead-in of the reamer would no longer need to be added to the depth manually. Example for Drilling:"Picture 2 Drilling" Example for Thread Cutting:"Picture 3 Thread cutting"    

Hi Everyone,I'm encountering a challenge while attempting static structural simulations in Creo Simulate using Mid Surface shell idealization with contact definitions.It appears that the contact interactions are being ignored during the solution process, leading to premature termination of the simulation. This issue seems specific to the shell idealization approach.While switching to solid or thin solid idealizations does allow the contacts to be recognized, it significantly increases model complexity and computational time.Has anyone faced a similar issue or found a workaround for this? Any suggestions or insights would be greatly appreciated.Thanks in advance!

I have the same problem with this topic: ModelCHECK does not recognize thickness in flat pa... - PTC Community with Model Check in CREO 12.4.1.0      

Hello PTC communityI am trying to solve a Topology optimization problem (CREO 10.0.9.0) for a rotating disc, but it is not converging properly.  Here is a simplified version of the problem I am trying to solve. 1) starting geometry = full disc2) preserve geometries = Center and exterior portion of the disc3) Axis have a cylindrical support 4) Contact defined between shaft and disc5) Centrifugal force added in the center axis direction  criteria below:  6) I tried mass reduction or stiffness and both did not converged correct7) I am defining symmetric distribution around axis and symmetric between central plane😎 material is defined with standard properties  This is the result I am getting  I tryied, axissymetric model as well (pie slice), it did not work as well.Any suggestions what I am doing wrong or how to set this problem properly?   

Hello All, In Creo 7 when saving as a STEP, I was able to select the coordinate system in the window shown in the attachment but in Creo 10 the button stays greyed.Does anybody know why this is ? 

If I try to Open Using Default Template for a result set, I immediately get an error message and then a fatal error. However, if I first launch Creo Simulate, and then use Open Result → Default Template, the same results open normally with no issues.     P.S. i don't have any Z:\ drive  

We are trying to develop a Creo Java Toolkit based application in synch mode (going by the recommendation from PTC) . We would like to use JavaFX for the UI .We see some old articles mentioning the issues related to using JavaFX in Creo Java Toolkit app and like to understand if there are folks who have used it successfully and any guidelines or recommendations to follow to do so.@Florent_Colab @GS_14113977 

Hello!I have a frame design. I wish to get the reactions on the 4 points.I have as load the gravitation.The "Y" Reactions are ok. Way I get also reactions on "X" and on "Z"? In case that I have on corner "1" and "4" NO translation and on the corners "2" and "3" translation, by using of load by side, I will not have reaction in the corners "2" and "3". So ...this is the art to determinate the forces, but this is wrong be side load. So ..how to set the constrains correct?Thank you! 

Creo 10For non spec driven pipes, is there a way to change the color of the center curve after the pipe has been modeled? Where is the control for the curve color?

1：creo12不能检索pro_Library_dir所指定的库中的元件。这是creo12的一个BUG么？因为其它版本的creo是正常的。 2：能不能设置一个选项，可以让功能区按键提示“ALT”被释放出来，用于快捷键比如ALT+1，ALT+F等。功能区按键这个操作太繁琐，按键次数太多并不能起到“快捷”的作用。而且在使用这个功能时因为软件要加载出提示，还会让软件感觉卡顿。再者大多数人并不会用到这个功能，况且还有一个F10可以用来做这个事。为什么ALT与F10两个按键用来做同一个事情呢。还占用ALT这个使用率超高的按键。 建议设置一个选项让用户选择是否使用这个功能，选择不使用这个功能时ALT键可以用来设置快捷键。

I want to make a Bimetal Strip Temperature Displacement for my full mechanical project :mechanical solar tracker (dual-axis sun follower) brief description a purely mechanical solar tracker that uses clockwork and thermal expansion to keep a small solar panel or mirror sun-facing, without any electronics or sensors. working principle heating the bimetallic strip triggers a ratchet mechanism for hourly, incremental platform rotation. gravity then leverages a weighted escapement to fully reset the platform upon sunset.also any advice for my projectsThanks

I am using Creo Parametric Release 9.0 and Datecode9.0.8.0While running edit command, Creo window get freeze and can't change the numbers

Working on a decent sized harness with around 2 dozen connectors and have routed all of it in 3D with coord systems and networks. In the past with smaller harnesses I have been able to manually put in the number of pins in the components tab and then in the pins tab add in the entry port, regenerate the assembly, go back into the parameters and the PIN ID and Cable name have automatically been populated. (Not using Cero schematics anywhere all manually routed) Just as a quick test for this harness I picked a few connectors to make sure everything was working and followed the same process above and the pin ID came in but the cable name did not. My question would be why is the cable name not coming in? My first guess would be that i need to fill out the entry port column for every single connector ( with that then do I need to do that for every port or just one per connector?). My other guess would be I am missing a step somewhere in there and something is not connecting correc

Has this been tested with Creo? Thanks

A user recently got a new computer with Creo 11.0.3.0. They noticed that their "shortcut" to Pro/Library was missing on left hand side of the Creo Browser underneath Common Folders. We looked into their config.pro and saw no issues. The pro_library_dir was even defined as it is on all other users' computers also running Creo 11.0.3.0. I even changed the setting on the config.sup file on their computer and that failed to make the Pro/Library shortcut show up. Has anyone else ran across this issue and what steps would you take to make the shortcut show up?Below is a picture of how it shows on my Creo Browser.  

I am using Creo Parametric Release 10.0 and Datecode10.0.7.0I have a user asking about defining a default simplified representation in a non-assembly model, is there a default simplified representation in non-assembly models? I have not been able to find default simplified representations in anything but assembly models.