Dedicated forum for our customers to share, collaborate, discuss best practices.
Recently active
Hi,
I want to use the a=log10V
Hello everyone in the community! I have a small problem: some fonts disappeared after uninstalling PRIME 9 and then installing PRIME 10. In Windows Character Map, the Math unimath fonts have disappeared. How can I recover them without having to do a system restore with the hope that those fonts will be recovered?
Hi,
working on an excel component in Prim 8, that is just over one page. how do I scale to fit page? without adding or remove cells.
If boundary conditions are: on the left bound ; on the right bound ;Initial condition is T(x,0)=300KObtain temperature distribution on each moment of time and each point of the dimension space(t0=0, tf=150 sec).
I'm trying to write this expression in mathcad to get the same results which I have in Excel However, I'm getting that wrong answers, can you please help me
Hi everyone,I am trying to solve a problem. I don't know about the implication and equivalence functions. I tried using chatgpt but got a weird answer which I completely did not understand. I copied the answer to Mathcad Prime which is attached below.Please help me out I will be thankful to you. Thank youRegardsKhalid
how to solve this . the sheet is attached
Hi folks,it has been passed some years from my last use of mathcad...I want to solve a system of equation by using the Solve Blok to find the coefficients for the displacement and velocity of a m otion law with "pure" traphezoid shape of the acceleration.I don't understand where I'm wrong.n. equations = n. of variables
I have created a ploy of stress in a curved bar. Attempting to plot vertical axis to delineate positive and negative stress. Will not plot together but have done this multiple tomes previously. The vertical axis plots separately OK. See page 11 at right Thanks for any help jmc
Hi,How to solve this non-linear system of equations:
Hi,I have this matlab code and I want to translate it to Mathcad Prime. I tried below one way, but maybe someone can implement better.Matlab: Mathcad Prime 9: And if I remove evaluation of t, the the plot does not work anymore: And then how to make this difference/calculation:
I'm trying to solve multiple unknowns using solve blocks but they don't seem to work. Is there another way to do this?
Hi,I am trying to configure the new MCP10 Text Box Advanced Controls.I want to use the Text Box as a PASS/FAIL display but I am having two issues.1) How do I pass more than one input into the Text Box? Currently, I can only add one input.2) How do I display text that is a result of the JScript routine in the box? (similar to how the Advanced Controls demo was shown in MCP10 promo, i.e., PASS = green, FAIL = red and so on).Currently, because I cannot pass slider_test and Limit into the Text Box, I have manually set Limit = 5 in JS (testing code). var slider_test; // Define the external variablevar test;var Limit;var limit;function TextBoxEvent_Start(Inputs, Outputs) {// Assign the value of 'slider_test'slider_test = Inputs[0].Value; // Ensure this correctly gets the input valueLimit = 5; // Ensure this correctly gets the input valuetest = slider_testlimit = Limit}function TextBoxEvent_Exec(Inputs, Outputs) {// Output "PASS" or "FAIL" based on the value of '
Does anyone know what algorithm is used for the various FFTs in MATHCAD 15?Thanks,Reg
Hi,As I have this equality: I see that I received 2 different answers out of the solve block for V2 and IE, though both systems of eq are the same...V2 and IE should not be the same for both cases?
Hello Everyone.From : To : So the question is : "solve x , y ?"Thanks in advance for your time and help.Best Regards.Loi
Subject to: Minimum lies in a range [0;2*π] Write it for MathCad15 please.Thank you
HiAs I could read here Ext-Packs I can remember the very useful Extentions packs for Mathcad version 15 but are these also for Prime 10.0 or Prime 6.0 available? And are these Ext Packs the same for Prime?THanks
Hi - in the attached Prime 9 worksheet my last line (solving for the only unknown, L subscript 4) hangs. The variable L subscript 4 is the only unknown in the equation. Is there a better way to solve for it than what I'm doing here? thanks,russ
how can I fix this:if (a )is less than zero the answer should alwyas be zero
In vibration theory there is a problem to define position and velocity of a rod which loaded with distributed bending force q(x). If to assume that this force acts by sine law the vibration equation will be written as follows: Where v(t,x) – function of vertical position of the rod points, E – elasticity modulus, J – second area moment, m – mass per unit length, ω – circular frequency of acting force.Note that J and E assumed to constant.If to substitute now v(t,x)=y(x)·sin(ω·t) one can obtain an ordinary differential equation which describes a form of oscillation:Solve this equation assuming:q=10 kgf/mm;Titanium alloy E=100 GPa;Second area moment J=1440 mm4. Which is equal to rectangle with sides 10 mm and 12 mm, and force acts along longer side;Circular freq. ω=0.1 1/s;Length l=100 mm;Rigid constraint on left bound y(0)=0, y’(0)=0;Bending force on the left bound ;Bending moment on the left bound ;
Apart from the counter-intuitive behaviour of the match() function (and I suppose this holds also for the lookup functions) as shown here: Due to the definition of z and A, none of the results should change when the value of TOL is changed. However: It seems like the value of TOL does 'influence the precision of the comparison' but in an unclear, unpredictable way. I would suggest that ONLY the 'fuzzy' descriptor/modifier "near" uses the value of TOL. Then "eq" should be implemented as 'equals exactly' and likewise for "leq", "lt", "gt", "geq" and "not". Then with "range" the comparison should be to the borders set by z exactly, after specifying whether or not the border values are in range or not. Then the description of "near" should not use the word, 'closest', because "near" is supposed to use the implicit range from (1-TOL)*z to (1+TOL)*z, where some values may be found closer to z than others. I suggest to add an option "nearest" to find the value(s) in A that is/are truely 'cl
I am writing to you to request clarification on an issue related to the definition and evaluation of variables in Mathcad. I am using PTC Mathcad Express Prime version 10.0.0.0. In the PTC documentation, it is mentioned that "Mathcad only recognizes variable definitions that are above or to the left of the variable evaluation. Otherwise, an error is returned." However, in my practice, I have observed the opposite: Mathcad recognizes the variable definition that is below and to the right of the variable evaluation, and if it does not, an error occurs. Additionally, I am experiencing a problem with unit labeling. When I try to label "a" as a drive, the label does not change when I select a new one from the list of labels. I thank you in advance for your attention to these concerns and I look forward to your response. Eduardo Huesca Hernandez Translated by the Community Moderation using Google Translate Me dirijo a ustedes
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.