PLM

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 13.0 and Datecode with CPS 13.0.2.2Hello,We are currently using Windchill version 13.0.2.2 in our organization. We've observed that some users are attempting to access Windchill without being assigned any valid licenses. In such cases, the error message displayed is overly technical and difficult for end users to understand.To improve the user experience, we would like to customize the error page to display a simple and clear message indicating that the issue is due to missing Windchill licenses. I’ve attached a screenshot of the current error for reference.This request is of high priority, as the existing error page is causing confusion among users and generating unnecessary support tickets.Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: ①WTPartの詳細画面上の操作メニューから、新規プロモーションリクエストを起票（「自動リビジョンモード」をオン） ②このプロモーションリクエストは特にタスクなどがなく、起票後即完了するワークフローであるので 起票後、ユーザーの操作なしにプロセスが完了します。 ③WTPartの画面をプロモーションリクエストの完了をトリガーに、またはWFの処理ロボットによって ①で開いていた画面のリフレッシュを行える機能が欲しいDescription: プロモーションリクエスト起票後、開いている画面を見てもリビジョンシーケンスが変わっておらず操作を失敗したのかと勘違いするエンドユーザーが多かった 自動リフレッシュが可能になれば、「最新を表示」が詳細画面に表示されるため上記の勘違いを抑制できるため、実現したい

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: I am using windchill pdmlink 13.0.2 version. I want to customize Advance Search -> Search parts -> Edit Multiple Object Description: I want to customize Advance Search -> Search parts -> Edit Multiple Object to1. Add editable columns for classification attributes related to selected Part2. Add editable columns for Manufacturing part attributes related to selected part. Can you please guide me in implementing this ? 

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.1 and Datecode with CPS 12.1.2.7Need help knowing how to pass the multi-valued parameter using field params in the webject (Update-Objects) for updating objects?

Does anyone have any experience with this type of use case and extending the configuration capabilities of Advanced Selection Logic to other types of structures besides part structures?

Version: Windchill 11.2 Use Case: Limit the display of Calibration Types to Parts requiring Calibration.Description: I've set up two attributes, a boolean "Calibration' and a string "Calibration Type". The default value for "Calibration" is "No".In the cascading attributes section, I have two rules. If calibration is no, hide calibration type. If calibration is yes, calibration type is required. (There is no "unhide" option).In the edit page, this works, mostly. If the existing part is without the calibration attribute, it gets set to 'No" and no cal options are display. If I then change from no to yes, the edit page refreshes, and the cal type options appear.BUT, if the existing part already has calibration set to yes, the initial load of the edit page shows 'Calibration YES" but the cal type is still hidden. Cal type doesn't appear unless the Calibration boolean is changed. Part has existing "Yes" selected on Calibration Attribute shows: When it should show: Casca

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.2.19How to get Gathering Part information from DB table with query sql

Am I correct in saying that the only difference between setting an attribute's visibility to "Value Hidden" and "Read Only" from within "Type and Attribute Management" is that the "Value Hidden" setting sets the display of the attribute value to "(Hidden)" and the "Read Only" setting sets it to "(Unassignable)" in the form for the operation the settings were applied to?

A few months ago our VAR mentioned some changes were coming to Windchill regarding possibly licensing or products, but at the time no specific info was available.  So far this is the first information I have seen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klMKVSA5Zv0 Just curious, has anyone else out there heard about this or seen info posted elsewhere ? 

(Windchill RV&S 13.2.0.3).  Currently when a user views the details of a document. The Branches tab shows documents contained in projects that the user does not have access to.  Only the ID and the some fields are shown.  This causes confusion for the user when they double-click the row and try to view the document.  We would like to request a feature to hide documents contained in projects that a user does not have access to.  

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.0 and Datecode with CPS 12.0.1.0It is necessary to confirm which versions of Windchill 12.0.X and Codebeamer 2.X are linked when establishing an OSLC connection between them.Please share the version information for OSLC connectivity between Windchill and Codebeamer so that I can refer to it for work purposes.If you could share the URL containing matrix information for this part, it would be very helpful.Please confirm and share the detailed conditions for this part.

I am using Windchill PDMLink Release 12.1 and Datecode with CPS 12.1.0.0Hi Team,Good Morning !!We have work on multiple project with many people work on the same and each people directly communication each other with eighter internal team or external team for particular task of same project and we use communication medium as a mail with project subject line. We want to upload each and every communication as a single thread communication on whinchild communication folder. mail System is not workingHere are the errors that I facedWe have work on multiple project with many people work on the same and each people directly communication each other with eighter internal team or external team for particular task of same project and we use communication medium as a mail with project subject line. We want to upload each and every communication as a single thread communication on whinchild communication folder. mail System is not working

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: Windchill Auto Associate missing during upload during upload of the CAD document.Description: Hello,I have already set in the preferences management about the 'Auto Associate upon check in' for parts. This works perfectly in the production environment.I can easily see the auto associate button in production environment.Can you help me what is missing in the test environment the option for the 'auto associate parts' is missing on the test environment ?When I check in the CAD part from Production Environment it automatically associates to CAD document.But in the test environment its not present.For reference, below are the screenshots.  Thank You in Advance. 

I'm getting started in query builder and I have a report that multiple pdp attributes. However all versions are returning, is there a way I can filter down for just the latest version?

We are using eclipse as tool and Configured Debug mode on the server.wanted to know is there any easy way to connect eclipse from local system and Configurations/Debugmode set up on Remote.as of now 2 developers can access remote at a time and it impacts the server performance.Is it possible to launch eclipse from local laptop and All debug mode & filesynch configured on remote server?

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: Affected Objects Table of Change Task of Implementation Plan in Change Notice. There is a disposition attributes column i.e. On-Order, Work-In-Process, Finished. I am in need to apply Data Utility to this column.Description: I already developed for custom MVC table but now in need to apply it on Out-Of-the-Box Table Is there any way to do that..?   Thanks

We have noticed that in our Windchill environment, some custom GET APIs have been added to WRS. By custom I mean they have names like test, deneme, etc., and in some cases, they match folder names. When we send a request to these APIs, they return the data contained within the corresponding folder in Windchill.The issue is, we don’t know who created these APIs — it seems someone did it unintentionally, and we only discovered them later.Does anyone know how this can be done, or have any documentation or examples explaining the process? This could be very useful in our development workflows.

Is there a method to configure a CAD driven BOM structure so a component (Qty 3 in CAD assembly) is listed three times as qty 1 for each occurrence so a COLOR usage attribute can be assigned to each?  

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: Our use case. we have Non Prod environments DEV TEST PRODUCTION.Using BAC can we import all the business admin changes  from lower environments which are executed on DEV -> Test and later to Production?Description: as of now we are loading Business admin changes (ACLs,OIR,Workflows,Lifecycle,etc) through load commands ..need more info on usage of BAC in Production deployments .anyone using in real time ?

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: Using a BAC in a CCD to update document templates, workflows, enumerations, attributes, and type.Description: Is anyone else having BAC Conflict Errors when loading a CCD package with a BAC? I'm testing the CCD on a dev server with updates to document templates, workflows, enumerations, attributes, and types. The first error I receive is BAC_DOCTEMPLATE_WITH_SAME_NUMBER_EXISTS. The BAC default conflict resolution is OVERWRITE and the service.properties file was changed to use the BACConflictResolver for BAC_DOCTEMPLATE_WITH_SAME_NUMBER_EXISTS. However, we still receive the conflict error. If I remove all the document templates from the BAC, I then receive ENUM_DEF_WITH_SAME_IDENTITY_EXISTS, ORGANIZER_WITH_SAME_IDENTITY_EXISTS, BAC_TABLE_VIEW_EXISTS, TYPE_WITH_SAME_IDENTITY_EXISTS, and WORKFLOW_WITH_SAME_IDENTITY_EXISTS errors. Within the UI, overwrite isn't an option in the event monitor for conflict resolution.

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: To set attribute value for a WTPartDescribeLink after creating itDescription: Hi all, I'm trying to set an attribute value for WTPartDescribeLink after creating it but If I try to set after creating it I get ModificationNotAllowed exception even when done within a transaction. The requirement is to create the link and set the attribute value without iterating. Is it mandatory to checkout the persistable before modifying the attribute value?

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: Creo checkins remove custom attributesDescription: I have custom attributes for my WT parts. When I check in a part from Creo, it resets these custom attributes. How do i make it so the WT part inherits the previous attribute values on checkin from Creo?

Version: Windchill 12.1 Use Case: ers are stored in the database. My goal is to retrieve or audit which users were added to specific discussion topics for traceability or automation purposes.Description: Hi,I'm working with the DiscussionTopic feature where discussions are grouped around a document or a specific object, and notifications or communications occur among users added to that topic.I was able to find the DiscussionTopic I created in the database. However, I couldn't find where the users (members) associated with this topic are stored. These are the users I manually added to the discussion, but I cannot locate their records in the database.Could someone help me understand where I can find the list of users linked to a DiscussionTopic?Thanks in advance.

Version: Windchill 13.0 Use Case: visdiff (from Mathworks) can compare simulink models within Matlab. Is there a way to integrate it as a default tool for simulink model comparison in Windchill?Description: visdiff (from Mathworks) can compare simulink models within Matlab.Is there a way to integrate it as a default tool for simulink model comparison in Windchill?

Version: Windchill Below 11.0 Use Case: Our old server that was running our Windchill database and vault is being decommissioned and will not be replaced. I need to get all of the CAD files out of it for historical reference. I no longer have access to any of the Windchill installers or old laptops that had this software installed on them.Description: My issue is very similar to this post:https://community.ptc.com/t5/Windchill/Export-all-CAD-from-Windchill-database/m-p/758411/highlight/true#M65150 However, I do not see any link to download the script that appeared to do exactly what I need. Does anyone have a copy of it? Or is there another way I can get the CAD out of the old server before it dies for good? I still have access to the old server, but I do not know for how much longer I will.